70 likes | 198 Views
Possible offline software organisation in UK. Background:. 1. ATLAS Software Review Concluded many things / annoyed many people ......but.... Stated aim is to ‘globalise’ software, so that effort from around world can be tapped properly.
E N D
Possible offline software organisation in UK Background: 1. ATLAS Software Review Concluded many things / annoyed many people ......but.... Stated aim is to ‘globalise’ software, so that effort from around world can be tapped properly. Idea of MOUs for some software tasks has emerged Therefore opportunities , to reconsider UK offline software contribution and particularly to develop OO sector. • 2. In ATLAS M.C. external members of committee commented: • UK software effort does not seem to be very coherent ? • Concerned that we dont have a ‘plan to reach a plan’ of • computing/software model
Individuals working in virtual groups Not UK based some questions: 1. Is UK based coordination needed ? 2. Would we be better concentrating effort on some obvious sectors related to SCT ? 3. Do we want to prepare to ‘bid’ for some real virgin ‘deliverable’ with an associated MOU. 4. Is it just a question of PR -defend non- national based virtual groups -presenting what is done already in more coherent way - pseudo MOUs -play active part in development of computing/software model Choose to work more closely in UK on some few projects
Some software tasks I know of which have UK connections/potential: Geant-4 Simulation of SCT Taskleader: Jo Pater Contributors: Steve Snow, Chris Lester, Bill Murray, Tim Brodbeck+others at Lancs Observations: Fairly virgin ground Very important and highly relevant to UK interests Internationally co-ordinated by Jo at CERN Probably doesnt need UK meeting layer ....but...people to speak to are a always useful Strongly suggest we always write a joint report on this to the UK MC !!! We could identify this as a ‘core’ UK area and encourage some others in UK to join
Alignment using tracks Taskleader/Organiser: Steve Haywood Contributors in UK ? SCT database Taskleader Jo Pater at present Contributors in UK ? Observations: I presume this covers production => physics I presume it needs a core of Objectivity experts + mechanical experts
OO Reconstruction and analysis framework (ARVE and evolutions) Coordinator : TBA Contributors: D.Candlin, R.Candlin, ?????sorry - who else in UK????? Comments: ATLAS Needs this ! Bona fide offline software contribution iin OO sector I suggest that any new physics interest could be pushed to do it in OO framework => push it forward by users => lead to contributions to this area
Software production process (ASP & evolution) Dont know what to say here except that UK people have been invloved in this, and sent unified letter to MC and ATLAS => this prior effort and feeling should be respected => this expertese should continue to be used.
Some personal observations to lead into discussion OO sector is certainly long term future and lots of work is needed => opportunity for new (and old) blood Management is acutely aware that it must change perception or fact that ist difficult to do anything quickly in this sector - so it WILL become easier. Now is a good time for us to at least review how best UK software effort might be applied to the ATLAS software needs. SCT simulation looks like a de-facto area we should back OO reconstruction framework looks interesting (naive view: links offline software with physics analysis) ......... discussion ...........