1 / 20

Journal Club

Journal Club. Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2006. Featured Article. Maternal coffee and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, parental smoking and risk of childhood acute leukemia Menegaux F, et al. Cancer Detect and Prev. 2005;29:487–493. Study Objective.

kelly-jarvis
Download Presentation

Journal Club

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2006 www.alcoholandhealth.org

  2. Featured Article Maternal coffee and alcohol consumption during pregnancy, parental smoking and risk of childhood acute leukemia Menegaux F, et al. Cancer Detect and Prev. 2005;29:487–493. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  3. Study Objective To examine the association between… • alcohol use, coffee drinking, and smoking during pregnancy and • childhood acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) and acute nonlymphoid leukemia (ANLL) www.alcoholandhealth.org

  4. Study Design • Case-control study of children hospitalized with… • newly diagnosed acute leukemia (n=280) or • for a disease other than cancer/birth defect (n=288) • All subjects from the same hospitals; controls mainly from orthopedic departments • Interviews of mothers that covered alcohol use during pregnancy and other topics (e.g., medical history) • Analyses adjusted for potential confounders www.alcoholandhealth.org

  5. Assessing Validity of an Article About Harm • Are the results valid? • What are the results? • How can I apply the results to patient care? www.alcoholandhealth.org

  6. Are the Results Valid? • Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known determinants of outcomes? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis? • Were exposed patients equally likely to be identified in the two groups? • Were the outcomes measured in the same way in the groups being compared? • Was follow-up sufficiently complete? www.alcoholandhealth.org

  7. Did the investigators demonstrate similarity in all known determinants of outcomes? Did they adjust for differences in the analysis? • Cases and controls were compared on demographic factors (they were similar). • Analyses were adjusted for these factors while examining effects of alcohol use, smoking, and coffee drinking separately. • Other risk factors for leukemia were not reported. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  8. Were exposed patients equally likely to be identified in the two groups? • Researchers described use of standardized questionnaires and similar interviewing conditions for both groups. • But, recall bias may have made identifying the exposure more likely in mothers of children with leukemia. • When asked about exposures during pregnancy, a mother with a child with newly diagnosed leukemia may be more likely to recall the exposures than would a mother of a child with an acute injury. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  9. Were the outcomes measured in the same way in the groups being compared? • Cases and controls were drawn from the same hospitals. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  10. Was follow-up sufficiently complete? • There was no follow-up. • This was a retrospective case-control study. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  11. What are the Results? • How strong is the association between exposure and outcomes? • How precise is the estimate of the risk? www.alcoholandhealth.org

  12. How strong is the association between exposure and outcomes? *Compared with no useand in analyses adjusted for age, sex, hospital, and ethnicity www.alcoholandhealth.org

  13. How strong is the association between exposure and outcome? (cont.) • Results did not differ when analyses were adjusted for… • any of the substances examined, • profession, • education, • early infection history, • breast-feeding, • maternal history of fetal loss, or • familial history of cancer. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  14. How precise is the estimate of the risk? • Confidence intervals: • for any alcohol use and ALL: 1.4–3.0 • for any alcohol use and ANLL: 1.2–5.8 • for drinking 4–8 cups of coffee per day and ALL: 1.3–4.7 • These intervals do not include 1, indicating statistical significance. • However, they are wide, particularly in the cases of alcohol and ANLL and coffee and ALL. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  15. How Can I Apply the Results to Patient Care? • Were the study patients similar to the patients in my practice? • Was the duration of follow-up adequate? • What was the magnitude of the risk? • Should I attempt to stop the exposure? www.alcoholandhealth.org

  16. Were the study patients similar to the patients in my practice? • The children were identified in 4 hospitals in France. • How they might differ from other children with leukemia, aside from geography, is not known. • Most of the children were Caucasian. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  17. Was the duration of follow-up adequate? • There was no follow-up. • Children with leukemia were younger than controls. Although unlikely, it is possible that… • results might have been different if follow-up (time since pregnancy and prenatal exposure) had been similar. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  18. What was the magnitude of the risk? • The risk of leukemia was 2–3 times greater for children of women who… • drank alcohol or 4–8 cups of coffee per day during pregnancy. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  19. Should I attempt to stop the exposure? • Pregnant women should not drink alcohol. • This recommendation is primarily because of the risk of fetal alcohol effects and syndrome. • Leukemia may represent an additional, but rarer, risk of alcohol consumption. www.alcoholandhealth.org

  20. Should I attempt to stop the exposure (cont.)? • Both the alcohol and coffee findings should be considered hypothesis generating. • This study alone should not determine choices around coffee consumption. • Data are sparse in this area, and further study is needed. www.alcoholandhealth.org

More Related