200 likes | 332 Views
Waterway Transportation and the Environmental Management Program in the Upper Mississippi River System. 尹耀 (Yin Yao) Director of International Strategies, The Nature Conservancy Great Rivers Partnership; and
E N D
Waterway Transportation and the Environmental Management Program in the Upper Mississippi River System 尹耀 (Yin Yao) Director of International Strategies, The Nature Conservancy Great Rivers Partnership; and Ecologist, United States Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center. 2630 Fanta Reed Road, La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603, USA.
Third largest river system in the world • migratory flyway for 40% of nations waterfowl • Over 250 species fish – critical N/S migration corridor • 326 bird species (60% of all species in N. America) • 37 species of mussels
Upper Mississippi River Navigation Dams Feet Miles
1890 1990 Upper Third Middle Third Lower Third
What Led to Monitoring on the UMR? • 1968 Lock and Dam 26 expansion recommendation • 1970 appropriated to run through 1975 • 1974 lawsuits filed, Court stopped • Initiated 1974-1976: by UMR Basin Commission • 1980 GREAT I and II “A study of the Upper Mississippi River” • GREAT River Resource Management Study, 1982 • UMR Basin Commission Master Plan published 1982 • 12 recommendation on navigation and environment • Draft bill “Upper Mississippi River System Management Act” • Draft Long-term Resource Monitoring Plan (Technical Report F) • WRDA 1986 Section 1103 “Upper Mississippi River Plan”
National Significance of Upper Mississippi River System “… the intent of Congress to recognize that system as a nationally significant ecosystem and a nationally significant commercial navigation system. … shall be administered and regulated in recognition of its several purposes.” Citation: Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1103(a)(2).
Congressional Language for the Environmental Management Program (HREP, LTRMP/CIA) • The Secretary of the Army, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin…..as identified in the Master Plan • Planning, construction, and evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and enhancement (NTE$13 m annually ~69%): HREP • Long-term resource monitoring program ($5 m ~26%): LTRMP • Computerized inventory and analysis system $.876m ~5%: CIA Also authorized LD 26 second lock
HABITAT REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS ( 66%) LONG TERM RESOURCE MONITORING ( 32%) ELEMENTS OF THE UMRS ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF RECREATION AND NAVIGATION MONITORING ( > 1%)
How…. Examples that may serve your purposes as well….
Manufacturing-$126B R e v e n u e Tourism-$6.6B Agriculture-$5B Energy production-$4.7B Commercial Nav-$1B Harvest-$9M Recreation-$200M High Low Degree of Reliance on Water Quality UMR as a Multiple-use Environment • $145 Billion • 870,000 Jobs • 40% of Corridor output • 18% economic activity in 5-state area
Great Rivers Partnership: Mission and Strategy • The Great Rivers Partnership will advance sustainable management of the Mississippi River system, and share knowledge and expertise to inform the management of other great rivers by: • convening diverse interests as an honest brokerto synthesize stakeholder perspectives with best science and practice to support a shared vision, and actionable programs, policies, and partnerships acting as a solutions provider and innovator in cooperation with a global network of expertise that helps inform and solve the most critical management challenges, through projects that demonstrate a systems approach using science-based adaptive management communicating as a unified expert voice on pertinent issues so as to build an informed constituency for the Mississippi River system and great rivers around the world