170 likes | 308 Views
THE URBAN INSTITUTE. Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults. John Holahan The Urban Institute February 4, 2008. Health Insurance Coverage, by Age and Income. All Incomes. Age 19-26. Age 27-34. Age 35-44. Age 45-54. Age 55-64. Percent.
E N D
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults John Holahan The Urban Institute February 4, 2008
Health Insurance Coverage, by Age and Income All Incomes Age 19-26 Age 27-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Percent Source: Urban Institute, 2007. Based on data from the 2007 ASEC Supplement to the CPS. Note: Excludes persons aged 65 and older and those in the Armed Forces.
Health Insurance Coverage, by Age and Income Less than 200% of FPL Age 19-26 Age 27-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Percent Source: Urban Institute, 2007. Based on data from the 2007 ASEC Supplement to the CPS. Note: Excludes persons aged 65 and older and those in the Armed Forces.
Health Insurance Coverage, by Age and Income 200% of FPL and Above Age 19-26 Age 27-34 Age 35-44 Age 45-54 Age 55-64 Percent Source: Urban Institute, 2007. Based on data from the 2007 ASEC Supplement to the CPS. Note: Excludes persons aged 65 and older and those in the Armed Forces.
Compared With Older Adults, Younger Adults Are • More likely to be single without children • Less likely to work full time and more likely to be non workers • More likely to be Hispanic
Age 17 Age 18 Age 19 Age 20 Age 21 Age 22 Insurance Coverage of Young Adults by Age, 2005-2006 All Incomes Percent
Uninsurance Among Young Adults, By Student Status, Ages 19-24(in millions)
Employer Sponsored Insurance: Offer and Take-Up Rates, By Age, 2005
Change in ESI Offers and Take Up Rates, By Age, 2001-2005(Percentage Point Changes)
Young Adults' Reports of Access Problems in Past Year by Insurance Status, 2005 Source: The Commonwealth Fund Biennial Health Insurance Survey, 2005. Adapted from Collins, et al. 2007 and reprinted with permission from author. Note: Refers to percent of young adults, ages 19-29, who reported experiencing the given access problem due to cost.
Policies to Reach Young Adults Require employers to allow parents to have kids up to age 24-26 as dependents. 1.6 million young adult uninsured children in families with one or more parents with ESI Many states already do this, no evidence of major effects Parents will likely have to pay much of the cost of dependents Risk of adverse selection 13
Policies to Reach Young Adults (cont.) Allow Medicaid/SCHIP to cover low income adults Only 14% of uninsured young adults are currently eligible Coverage of all those below poverty would reach 4.6 million of the 10.3 million uninsured young adults, assuming 100% participation; will also have adverse selection; crowd-out effects will be low because only 21% have ESI whereas 47% are uninsured (2006) Coverage of those between 100%-200% FPL would reach another 3.2 million; crowd-out rates will be higher (39% have ESI and 41% are uninsured) 14
Policies to Reach Young Adults (cont.) Require coverage of college students Would cover 1.9 million uninsured young adults Most (75%) uninsured young adults are not students; non students have a much greater likelihood of being uninsured. (39.3% vs 19.2%) May be necessary with state or national health reform 15
Candidates Proposals and Young Adults • Tax Policies • Tax credit would cover a high share of costs of young adult policy, particularly if healthy and in low cost state • Tax deductions (e.g. Bush) would be less helpful because most uninsured young adults are low income • Medicaid Expansion, Income Related Subsidies • Would provide subsidies to high share of young adult uninsured • Many would not enroll, despite subsidies, in voluntary system; young and healthy are most likely to remain uninsured • Lack of waiting periods in Medicaid will exacerbate adverse selection
Candidates Proposals and Young Adults (cont.) • Insurance Reforms • Guaranteed issue and modified community rating can increase costs of insurance, particularly in voluntary system; these reforms will adversely affect young adults; even modified community rating will increase costs more than experience rating. • Individual Mandate • Would require young adults to be covered; they would pay more for coverage than pre-reform • Many who would be mandated would receive financial assistance • What should their responsibilities be for support of older Americans, in exchange for guarantee of coverage later in life or in case of unexpected events?