290 likes | 647 Views
Acid-base and donor-acceptor chemistry Hard and soft acids and bases. Classical concepts. Arrhenius : acids form hydrogen ions H + (hydronium, oxonium H 3 O + ) in aqueous solution bases form hydroxide ions OH - in aqueous solution acid + base salt + water
E N D
Acid-base and donor-acceptor chemistry Hard and soft acids and bases
Classical concepts • Arrhenius: • acids form hydrogen ions H+ (hydronium, oxonium H3O+) in aqueous solution • bases form hydroxide ions OH- in aqueous solution • acid + base salt + water • e.g. HNO3 + KOH KNO3 + H2O • Brønsted-Lowry: • acids tend to lose H+ • bases tend to gain H+ • acid 1 + base 1 base 1 + acid 2 (conjugate pairs) • H3O+ + NO2- H2O + HNO2 • NH4+ + NH2- NH3 + NH3 • In any solvent, the reaction always favors the formation of the weaker acids or bases The Lewis concept is more general and can be interpreted in terms of MO’s
d+ d- C C C O O O M M Remember that frontier orbitals define the chemistry of a molecule CO is a s-donor and a p-acceptor
adduct base acid Acids and bases (the Lewis concept) A base is an electron-pair donor An acid is an electron-pair acceptor Lewis acid-base adducts involving metal ions are called coordination compounds (or complexes)
Frontier orbitals and acid-base reactions Remember the NH3 molecule
New LUMO (non-bonding) New HOMO (bonding) Frontier orbitals and acid-base reactions The protonation of NH3 (Td) (C3v)
In most acid-base reactions HOMO-LUMO combinations lead to new HOMO-LUMO of the product But remember that there must be useful overlap (same symmetry) and similar energies to form new bonding and antibonding orbitals What reactions take place if energies are very different?
Frontier orbitals and acid-base reactions Even when symmetries match several reactions are possible, depending on the relative energies
Frontier orbitals and acid-base reactions Very different energies like A-B ó A-E no adducts form Similar energies like A-C ó A-D adducts form A base has an electron-pair in a HOMO of suitable symmetry to interact with the LUMO of the acid
Bonding e Non-bonding e MO diagram derived from atomic orbitals (using F…….F group orbitals + H orbitals)
HOMO-LUMO of HF for s interaction Non-bonding (no symmetry match) Non-bonding (no E match) But it is also possible from HF + F-
The MO basis for hydrogen bonding F-H-F- LUMO HOMO HOMO First take bonding and antibonding combinations.
Similarly for unsymmetrical B-H-A Total energy of B-H-A lower than the sum of the energies of reactants
Good energy match, strong H-bonding e.g. CH3COOH + H2O Poor energy match, little or no H-bonding e.g. CH4 + H2O Very poor energy match no adduct formed H+ transfer reaction e.g. HCl + H2O
Hard and soft acids and bases Hard acids or bases are small and non-polarizable Soft acids and bases are larger and more polarizable Halide ions increase in softness: fluoride < chloride<bromide<iodide Hard-hard or soft-soft interactions are stronger (with less soluble salts) than hard-soft interactions (which tend to be more soluble).
Most metals are classified as Hard (Class a) acids or acceptors. Exceptions shown below: acceptors metals in red box are always soft (Class b). Other metals are soft in low oxidation states and are indicated by symbol. Solubilities: AgF > AgCl > AgBr >AgI But…… LiBr > LiCl > LiI > LiF Class (b) or soft always
Chatt’s explanationClass (b) soft metals have d electrons available for p-bonding Model: Base donates electron density to metal acceptor. Back donation, from acid to base, may occur from the d electrons of the acid metal into vacant orbitals on the base. Higher oxidation states of elements to the right of transition metals have more class b character since there are electrons outside the d shell. Ex. (Tl(III) > Tl(I), has two 6s electrons outside the 5d making them less available for π-bonding) For transition metals: high oxidation states and position to the left of periodic table are hard low oxidation states and position to the rightof periodic table are soft Soft donor molecules or ions that are readily polarizable and have vacant d or π* orbitals available for π-bonding react best with class (b) soft metals
Tendency to complex with hard metal ions N >> P > As > Sb O >> S > Se > Te F > Cl > Br > I Tendency to complex with soft metal ions N << P > As > Sb O << S > Se ~ Te F < Cl < Br < I
The hard-soft distinction is linked to polarizability, the degree to which a molecule or ion may be easily distorted by interaction with other molecules or ions. Hard acids or bases are small and non-polarizable Soft acids and bases are larger and more polarizable Hard acids are cations with high positive charge (3+ or greater), or cations with d electrons not available for π-bonding Soft acids are cations with a moderate positive charge (2+ or lower), Or cations with d electrons readily availbale for π-bonding The larger and more massive an ion, the softer (large number of internal electrons Shield the outer ones making the atom or ion more polarizable) For bases, a large number of electrons or a larger size are related to soft character
Hard acids tend to react better with hard bases and soft acids with soft bases, in order to produce hard-hard or soft-soft combinations In general, hard-hard combinations are energetically more favorable than soft-soft An acid or a base may be hard or soft and at the same time it may be strong or weak Both characteristics must always be taken into account e.g. If two bases equally soft compete for the same acid, the one with greater basicity will be preferred but if they are not equally soft, the preference may be inverted
Fajans’ rules • For a given cation, covalent character increases • with increasing anion size. • For a given anion, covalent character increases • with decreasing cation size. • The covalent character increases • with increasing charge on either ion. • Covalent character is greater for cations with non-noble gas • electronic configurations. A greater covalent character resulting from a soft-soft interaction is related With lower solubility, color and short interionic distances, whereas hard-hard interactions result in colorless and highly soluble compounds
Quantitative measurements Absolute hardness (Pearson) Mulliken’s absolute electronegativity (Pearson) EHOMO = -I ELUMO = -A Softness
Energy levels • for halogens • and relations between • , hand HOMO-LUMO energies