1 / 22

Numerical Method of DGLAP Evolution and Modified FFs in Medium

Numerical Method of DGLAP Evolution and Modified FFs in Medium. Wei-Tian Deng. Numerical Methods. The HOPPET (High Order Perturbative Evolution Toolkit) higher-order Runge-Kutta method x-spaces grid. Taylor Series:. Euler method:. Euler method:. Second-Order Runge-Kutta method:.

kendall-tyson
Download Presentation

Numerical Method of DGLAP Evolution and Modified FFs in Medium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Numerical Method of DGLAP Evolution and Modified FFs in Medium Wei-Tian Deng

  2. Numerical Methods • The HOPPET (High Order Perturbative Evolution Toolkit) • higher-order Runge-Kutta method • x-spaces grid.

  3. Taylor Series: Euler method: Euler method:

  4. Second-Order Runge-Kutta method:

  5. Fourth-Order Runge-Kutta method:

  6. X-spaces Grid • PDFs Piecewise interpolating polynomials

  7. X-spaces Grid • convolution • DGLAP evolution Evolution operator

  8. Relative Accuracy

  9. Relative Accuracy The more denser grids, the better relative accuracy

  10. HOPPET vs. KKP (vacuum)

  11. Final state? Quenching • Final state interactions responsible for “jet quenching” instead of initial states. hadronization shower Splitting function

  12. DGLAP The DGLAP evolution function of (FFs): The splitting functions in vacuum:

  13. Modified Splitting Functions

  14. Modified FFs

  15. Modified FFs

  16. Suppress of FFs Vs. L

  17. Z=0.2 Z=0.4 Z=0.8 Z=0.6 Suppress of FFs Vs. L E=100 GeV Q=E

  18. ˆ q Energy Loss Vs.

  19. ˆ q Energy Loss Vs. L=2 fm L=5 fm

  20. ˆ q Energy Loss Vs. L=2 fm L=5 fm

  21. Outlooks

  22. Outlook

More Related