210 likes | 514 Views
2. Examples of Public and Private Goods. Public GoodsNational defenseA Clean House for family members Opera BroadcastsMusic file sharingUncongested freeway. Private goodsIce CreamHealth careOpera RecordingsHousingCongested freeway. 3. Valuation of Public Goods. Everyone consumes same quant
E N D
1. 1 Public Goods Defined Pure public goods share two characteristics
Nonrival – Cost of another person consuming the good is zero
Nonexcludable – Very expensive to prevent others from consuming the good
2. 2 Examples of Public and Private Goods Public Goods
National defense
A Clean House for family members
Opera Broadcasts
Music file sharing
Uncongested freeway Private goods
Ice Cream
Health care
Opera Recordings
Housing
Congested freeway
3. 3 Valuation of Public Goods Everyone consumes same quantity of a public good
Marginal benefit of a public good varies by person
Examples:
Clean house to family members
Homeland security to citizens
4. 4 Near (Impure) Public Goods Some goods that are thought of as public goods may not strictly satisfy the nonrival or nonexcludable assumption.
An un-congested city street is a public good: it is both nonrival and nonexcludable.
As the street gets more congested,however, it goes from being non-rival to rival as the number of cars using it increases.
5. 5 Private Goods can Be Provided by the Public Sector In contrast to pure public goods, there are also “publicly provided private goods.”
Key criteria to a pure public good: is it rival and excludable?
Take Public Housing for poor people as an example. This is both rival (one family consumes one apartment) and excludable (easy to prevent consumption).
6. 6 Efficient Provision of Private Goods Derivation of Market demand
Each person’s demand curve represents the willingness-to-pay for an additional unit of a good
Private good: holding P constant, add together individual quantities to get Q
Horizontal summation
7. 7 Equilibrium in Private Goods Market Optimal provision where supply curve (MC) intersects market demand curve
Everyone pays the same price, P
Individuals consume different quantities, Q
Pareto efficient : MRSA = MRSB = MRT
8. 8 Efficient Provision of Public Goods Consider an Opera Broadcast as a public good – it is nonrival and nonexcludable.
More Opera programming gives each consumer a higher benefit, but all consume the same amount.
Public good: holding Q constant, add together individual willingness-to-pay to get P.
Vertical summation.
9. 9 Efficiency in Public Goods Market Optimal provision still where supply curve (MC) intersects market demand curve
But now, everyone consumes the same quantity, Q.
Each individual’s marginal benefit varies.
Pareto efficient : MRSA + MRSB = MRT
10. 10 Efficient Allocations of Public Goods: The Free Rider Problem Although a competitive market will provide private goods efficiently, will the same be true for public goods?
People might have strong incentives to hide their true preferences for a public good.
If Georgia can get Nina to pay for the public good, she can use her income for other purposes and still enjoy the public good.
11. 11 The Free Rider Problem This incentive to let others pay for the public good while still enjoying the benefits is known as the “free rider problem.”
The private market may therefore fall short of providing the efficient amount of the public good.
12. 12 The Free Rider Problem This incentive to free ride occurs because the public good is nonrival and nonexcludable.
A person gets to consume the good even if he does not pay for it.
13. 13 The Free Rider Problem Recall that in our example, Georgia’s MRS = 0 at the socially optimal output level.
Georgia would have a strong incentive to offer zero (MRSG < PN+G) to any entrepreneur attempting to “sell” her the public good.
She would still receive as much benefit if Nina paid for the entire level of provision.
14. 14 Solutions to the Free Rider Problem Government intervention can potentially lead to a more efficient outcome. Government can use coercive power to force people to pay for public goods, through taxation. Free riding is not a fact, however. There are instances when individuals do act collectively without coercion. Laboratory experiments on college students contradict the notion that free riding will lead to zero contributions for the public good. Some suggest the results derive from a “warm glow” of giving.