29. Criminal Investigation – Court Room

1. 29. Criminal Investigation – Court Room TCLEOSE LEARNING OBJECTIVES 08/05/04

2. Objectives • Unit Goal: 29.10. To prepare the student to be an effective courtroom witness. • 29.10.1. Identify and discuss the benefits of professional courtroom demeanor and appearance. • 29.10.2. Explain and employ the steps used to refresh memory in preparation for testimony. • 29.10.3. Demonstrate proper demeanor when called to testify. • 29.10.4. Describe methods of court procedure. • 29.10.6. Demonstrate response to questions within the limits of known information rather than speculate. • 29.10.7. Explain the procedure for exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom. • 29.10.8. Recognize and give examples of courtroom tactics by defense attorney. • 29.10.9. Demonstrate the ability to testify effectively and to critique the testimony of others.

3. 29.10.1. Identify and discuss the benefits of professional courtroom demeanor and appearance.

4. Benefits of professionalism in a courtroom: • The precautions officers take at a crime scene, the handling of evidence, interviews, complete and accurate reports and detailed case preparation culminate in a trial • The reputation of the officers and the department may be enhanced or diminished by the demeanor and appearance of the officers in court • A positive outcome is achieved when the appearance meets the trial objectives, public relations are improved, and the officers are satisfied • Officers who do not prepare for court appearances risk personal humiliation through unacceptable personal appearances and/or poorly expressing themselves while testifying • Courtroom testimony represents a challenge to officers and is a test of true abilities, such as self-control, tact, obedience, personal conduct, bearing, and verbal communication

5. 29.10.2. Explain and employ the steps used to refresh memory in preparation for testimony.

6. Elements of preparation for testimony: • Vital to every criminal prosecution is the officers’ preparation to testify • Anticipation of logical questions allows for refreshing memory on important information • Have ready a full history of the officers' participation in the case, with any relevant evidence and facts • Conduct a careful study of reports, interviews, photos, evidence, and notes • Failure to do so will often result in misstatements, omissions, and contradictions

7. Using notes during testimony: • The decision to use notes in court must be based on a determination as to whether or not the information can be remembered without the notes • Some officers believe that jurors trust officers’ notes more than their memory and are favorably impressed when notes are used • If the witness/officer had firsthand knowledge of the preparation of the notes and the notes were prepared contemporaneously to the investigation, the notes may be used by the witness to refresh memory • However, once the notes are used by the witness/officer, they are subject to cross-examination and admission into evidence

8. Mode and order of interrogation and presentation - TRE 611

9. 29.10.3. Demonstrate proper demeanor when called to testify.

10. Giving First Impression: • Approach the court confidently • Walk directly to the witness stand or clerk's desk and prepare to take the oath • Do not look at the accused, the jury, or the judges • Follow the prosecutor's direction

11. Taking the Oath: • While taking the oath, look at the person administering it • Keep right hand at shoulder level, with fingers extended, until the oath is completed • The prosecutor will then begin by directing the officer to be seated and then asking for name, occupation, and department

12. 29.10.4. Describe methods of court procedure.

13. The initial phase of the trial during which the prosecution presents the evidence demonstrating the guilt of the defendant is usually when the officer is first called to testify.

14. Direct Examination: • The prosecutor elicits facts from the officer • Direct testimony to the jury, or to the judge in the absence of a jury, when answering prosecutor's questions • In the event that defense counsel objects to a question, remain silent until the court has ruled on the objection • The judge will rule on the objection in one of two ways • "Sustained" (the officer may not answer) • "Overruled" (the officer may answer the question)

15. Cross Examination: • The defense counsel will begin the questioning after the prosecution has finished with the witness.

16. Redirect Examination: • Following the cross examination by the defense attorney, the prosecutor may question the witness to clarify statements or answers given during the cross-examination.

17. Recross Examination: • The defense attorney may further question a witness after redirect examination by the prosecutor.

18. 29.10.5. Discuss and use techniques for presenting effective testimony.

19. A juror’s impressions are strongly affected by the manner in which an officer/witness informs the court of the facts discovered during the course of an investigation.

20. The Principles of Witnessmanship: • Honesty: present a modest demeanor and display a sincere interest in the accuracy and truth of statements. • Brevity: most witnesses do not get flustered, confused, or embarrassed as long as they confine their statements to answering the questions. Be brief and to the point. Do not volunteer information, argue with the attorney, or make spontaneous, unneeded comments. • Clarity: errors, inconsistencies, and confusion undermine credibility with the jury. • Objectivity: present an impartial and conscientious picture of a public servant working for the interests of justice. Be courteous, answer directly, and remain poised. The defense counsel will often endeavor to portray the officers as prejudicial and interested to accuse the first person of whom they become suspicious, so remain the objective public servant during testimony. • Emotional Control: ignore insults, badgering, and innuendoes. A display of anger loses credibility.

21. 29.10.6. Demonstrate response to questions within the limits of known information rather than speculate.

22. Officers should answer only the questions they are qualified to answer. • "I don't know": does not mean ignorance, only that the facts were not observed directly. This statement closes examination on a point about which the attorney may need to ask additional questions concerning forgotten facts. "That is all I can recall" may be an appropriate statement. • "I don't remember": witness is unsure. • Avoid irritation, anger, being misled, or trapped. Stay with the facts of the case to avoid distortion of statements and conflicting testimony. • Opinion evidence should always be based upon facts. Make clear the distinction between opinion and facts. Represent only facts as fact.

23. 29.10.7. Explain the procedure for exclusion of witnesses from the courtroom.

24. Applicable codes: • Exclusion of witnesses - TRE 614 • Invocation of rule - CCP 36.03 • Not to hear testimony - CCP 36.05 • Instructed by the court - CCP 36.06

25. Officer/witness to leave courtroom, stay close to courtroom, not discuss the case with other witnesses or jurors, and after testifying leave the courtroom again. ("under the rule")

26. Staying in the courtroom when witnesses have been excluded may render the officer ineligible to testify, thereby threatening the outcome of the case. The result is usually prejudicial to the state’s case.

27. 29.10.8. Recognize and give examples of courtroom tactics by defense attorney.

28. Many times the defense counsel realizes the prosecution has an extensive case against the defendant so the only logical defense must be based on challenging the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses.

29. Defense Tactics: • Offensive: rapid-fire questioning is intended to confuse the witness and procure inconsistent answers. When faced with such a situation, take time to consider each question, be deliberate in answering, and ask to have the question repeated. Remain calm. • Condescending: defense counsel will be ultra benevolent in approach to the point of ridicule in an effort to give the impression that the witness is inept. When faced with such a situation, ask for the question to be repeated if it was improperly phrased and then answer in a firm and decisive manner. • Friendly: defense counsel may be overly courteous in an effort to lull the witness into a false sense of security where answers may be given in favor of the defense. When faced with such a situation, stay alert and bear in mind that the defense counsel is attempting to diminish the effect of the testimony. • Badgering / Belligerent: intended to provoke to lose emotional control and, therefore, credibility with the jury. When faced with such a situation, ignore the defense counsel's actions, stay calm, speak in a deliberate voice, and give the prosecutor time to make the appropriate objections.

30. 29.10.9. Demonstrate the ability to testify effectively and to critique the testimony of others.

31. Since the witness's testimony in what the verdict is based upon, follow closely the questions of the attorney, avoid extraneous material, and allow time for objections. • Objections are to keep improper evidence out of the case. When the defense attorney asks a question, pause long enough to give the prosecutor time to object. If an objection is made, remain silent until the judge rules on the objection. • Treat both attorneys in the same courteous manner, showing respect and an unbiased attitude.

32. Note to the instructor: It is mandatory that students engage in a mock trial. Refer to example in IRG.

35. LEARNING OBJECTIVE: 29.10 Criminal Investigation – practical application.

36. .Select student, instructor, and/or officer to participate as suspect, witness, and complainant. If no site is available use the attached floor plan and indite points of entry and exit. .Instruct class that they are to apply all their learned skills, and knowledge to investigate the crime.

37. .Provide specific instruction to players.

38. .Divide class into teams.

39. .Have them investigate, write report, file appropriate charge(s) and prepare case for presentation.

40. Note to the instructor: It is suggested that these exercises be used following completion of the criminal investigation section.

41. Offense: Burglary

42. Witness: You are a neighbor residing across the street from a house that is being burglarized. You noticed a suspicious vehicle backed into the driveway of your neighbor’s house and you called the police. After calling the police you noticed a white male dressed in blue jeans, white T-shirt exiting the house from the front door. He was carrying some type of large item that appeared to be a box. He got into the vehicle on the passenger side. A late model Chevrolet Camero, dark blue, damage to left front side, decal “Hot” on rear window. Texas PKP 709. Vehicle occupied by at least one other unknown suspect. Vehicle left scene headed west.

43. When officers arrive do not volunteer any information until asked and then respond only to direct questions.

44. If officers ask what you saw – limit your response with general statements: EXAMPLE: “This guy broke in and took something out of the house. They were in a blue Chevy.”

45. Complainant: Left home at 7:30 AM en route to work. Returned home 5:30 PM. Noticed front door had been pried open. Checked house and found silverware missing.

46. Description of property: 12 place setting, Oneida Silverware, Classic Rose pattern. Carrying case, brown leather, size 24” x 18” x 6”. Valued $1,200.00.

47. Appear to be traumatized because your home and property has been violated.

48. If officers ask, respond with all known information. Be cooperative.

49. Officers: Give student officers the call to investigate a suspicious car at location.

50. Offense: Family disturbance