140 likes | 326 Views
More GRASP Patterns. Polymorphism Indirection Pure Fabrication Protected Variations (Law of Demeter). Protected Variations. Problem : How do we design systems so that changes in its elements do not have an unfavourable impact on other elements?
E N D
More GRASP Patterns • Polymorphism • Indirection • Pure Fabrication • Protected Variations (Law of Demeter) 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Protected Variations • Problem: How do we design systems so that changes in its elements do not have an unfavourable impact on other elements? • Solution: Identify points of predicted variation/instability and assign responsibilities to create a stable interface around them • Example: • Law of Demeter (LoD) • Special case of this pattern. • If objects traverse long object structure paths and send messages to distant, indirect (stranger) objects, the system is fragile with respect to changes in the object structures - a common point of instability in systems. LoD helps us avoid creating such designs 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Law of Demeter • Also called Don’t Talk to Strangers • Each class should only use a limited set of other classes: only units “closely” related to the current unit. • “Each class should only talk (send messages) to its friends.” “Don’t talk to strangers.” 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Law of Demeter FRIENDS 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Don’t Talk to Strangers Suppose Register needs to find out the amount of the payment Register Sale Payment paymentAmount() endSale() enterItem() makePayment() ... becomeComplete() makeLineItem() makePayment() getTotal() getPayment ... getTenderedAmount() add a method to get a payment • The class diagram shows that • Register knows about Sale, and • Sale knows about Payments that have been made towards it 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Don’t Talk to Strangers • Assume: • Register has a paymentAmount method which returns the current amount tendered for the payment • Sale has a method, getPayment, which returns the Payment instance associated with the Sale • Consider: • In order to return the payment amount, we could have a paymentAmount method in Register such as: • public void paymentAmount() • { • Payment payment = sale.getPayment() • Money amount = payment. getTenderedAmount() • } A little different from the text’s example 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Don’t Talk to Strangers The previous has messages: :Register :Sale • getPayment() Register will have a dependency on Payment This increases the coupling in our system • getTenderedAmount() :Payment 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Don’t Talk to Strangers • If getPayment() in Sale would invoke getTenderedAmount() in Payment, and return the payment amount, then we can de-couple Register from Payment • make the solution more robust, less sensitive to changes, less coupling • getPayment() :Register :Sale Register will get the payment amount it is after, but it won’t know how it was obtained - see Parnas’ concept of information hiding on • getTenderedAmount() Objects are only sending messages to their friends :Payment 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Law of Demeter presentation: • www.ccs.neu.edu/research/demeter/talks/frameworks/ubs/LoD.ppt • Karl J. Lieberherr; Northeastern University • other resources • www.ccs.neu.edu/research/demeter/ • www.ccs.neu.edu/home/lieber/LoD.html • Article on Information hiding • www.computer.org/certification/beta/McConnell_Missing.html 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Example: Applying LoD as system changes busStops BusRoute BusStopList buses 0..* BusStop BusList waiting 0..* passengers Bus PersonList Person 0..* 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Find all persons waiting at any bus stop on a bus route Collaborating classes: busStops BusRoute BusStopList buses 0..* BusStop BusList waiting 0..* passengers Bus PersonList Person 0..* 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Applying Law of Demeter - Partial Java Solution class BusRoute { BusStopList busstops; void printWaitingPassengers () { busstops->printWaitingPassengers (); } } class BusStopList { BusStop stops[]; void printWaitingPassengers () { for (int i = 0; i < stops.length; i++) stops[i].printWaitingPassengers (); } } 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Applying Law of Demeter - Partial Java Solution class BusStop { PersonList waiting; void printWaitingPassengers () { waiting.print (); } } class PersonList { Person people[]; void print () { for (int i = 0; i < people.length; i++) people[i].print (); } } class Person { String name; void print () { System.stdout.println (name); } } 92.3913 R. McFadyen
Suppose the class model is modified to incorporate Villages. What software changes are needed and still adhere to LoD? villages BusRoute BusStopList buses VillageList busStops 0..* 0..* BusStop BusList Village waiting 0..* passengers Bus PersonList Person 0..* 92.3913 R. McFadyen