1 / 106

Using Doppler Radar to “Nowcast” Winter Storms ...A Review

Using Doppler Radar to “Nowcast” Winter Storms ...A Review. MSC Winter Severe Weather Workshop Boulder February 2002. Outline. Doppler in Synoptic Storms is More than just a profiler. We can use the “Non Symmetry” of radial velocity displays in Nowcasting. Frontal Structures

keon
Download Presentation

Using Doppler Radar to “Nowcast” Winter Storms ...A Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Using Doppler Radar to “Nowcast” Winter Storms...A Review MSC Winter Severe Weather Workshop Boulder February 2002

  2. Outline • Doppler in Synoptic Storms is More than just a profiler. • We can use the “Non Symmetry” of radial velocity displays in Nowcasting. • Frontal Structures • Convergence, Ascending jets. • Topographical Effects • Valleys, Upslope Flow

  3. Outline.. continued • Forecasting Precipitation Phase • Combining Bright Bands and radial velocity displays • Winter Quantitative Precipitation Estimation using radar.

  4. Precipitation Phase • Warm Fronts • From radial velocity patterns • Depth of cold air • Nowcasting of Temperature Advections • Changes in Strength of low level flow. • From logz and cross sections • bright band • Freezing level, lowest extent of melting snow

  5. Example 1 • February 15 1990. • Major event in Toronto: 20 cm of snow followed by 24 hours of ZR with 2 cm accumulations. • Models underestimated outflow and had Toronto changing to rain 18 hours too early. • Doppler useful in assessing situation.

  6. Two Different Warm Fronts It’s “What Lies Beneath” That Counts.

  7. Bright Bands • Most pcpn forms through ice process rather than rain process • As snow falls through FZG LVL snow melts from outside, thus initially looks like slow falling large raindrop • Results in 5-15 dBz increase in reflectivity • Relative max of reflectivity (Bright band) is just below FZG LVL. Persists til all snow has melted. • Most predominant in stratiform situations

  8. Bright Band Example B.C. 13 Dec 1998

  9. Bright Band- RHI display

  10. Bright Bands and Forecasting • Freezing Levels • Vertical Extent of wet snow. • Very useful in varying terrain.

  11. March 27 2001 • Synoptic storm moves through lower mainland. • Rain and plus 9C had been forecast. • Outflow brought colder temps (3C YVR) and wet snow in higher suburbs.

  12. Sequence of Events on Radar • Low level flow initially southeast then outflow develops down Fraser Valley. • Low level air cools with outflow and freezing level drops. • Outflow weakens and freezing level starts to rise again.

  13. March 27 2001 • Interesting example of combining bright band with radial velocity winds. • Bright band shows height of melting layer lowering corresponding to intensity of outflow.

  14. Between 1900z and 2000z lowest level flow backs and by 2200z there is a significant outflow down the Fraser Valley. • By 0030 the outflow reaches it’s peak and then starts to weaken.

  15. Relationship between outflow and freezing level • Bright band gives height of freezing level and lowest elevation of any wet snow. • Let’s look at relationship between bright band and outflow. • Windows media player.

  16. Synoptic Example 2 • Dec 11 2000 • Cold frontal passage at Toronto followed 12 hours later by major precipitation event. • Models indicated snow/freezing rain line very close to Toronto. • Use Doppler pattern to monitor accuracy of models.

  17. Synoptic Example 3 • March 5 2001 • Great uncertainty about snow amounts over Toronto. • Rather innocuous pattern. Strong low level convergence on Doppler indicated significant low level vertical velocities going on.

  18. A similar Alberta example

  19. Cold Fronts and radial velocities

  20. Cold Fronts • Usually marked by quite sharp change in wind direction. This will mean sharp change in radial component of wind • Will show up as a discontinuity on Doppler.

More Related