210 likes | 355 Views
Application of SASHA for Portugal cases: mainland Portugal. Carvalho A. (LNEC), Albarello D. (Un. Siena), Meroni F. (INGV) and Zonno G. (INGV). Elements used for a preliminary application evaluate the Seismic Hazard of Portugal using SASHA2.0.3. seismic catalog with Intensity Io
E N D
Application of SASHA for Portugal cases: mainland Portugal Carvalho A. (LNEC), Albarello D. (Un. Siena), Meroni F. (INGV) and Zonno G. (INGV)
Elements used for a preliminary application evaluate the Seismic Hazard of Portugal using SASHA2.0.3 • seismic catalog with Intensity Io • attenuation parameters • SASHA2.0.3 program code • At the moment, localseismichistorieshavenotbeenconsidered
Using SASHA2.0.3 • completeness is accounted for during hazard computations • no effect of uncertain seismotectonic zoning • evetual clustering is accounted for and no aftershock removal is required Hazard Mapping Based on Macroseismic Data Considering the influence of Geological Conditions By M.L. Sousa and C.S. Oliveira Natural Hazards 14: 2007-225, 1997
Seismic catalogue Lisboa 1755 Distribution of seismic seismicity around Mainland Portugal, Lower Tagus Valley and Algarve
Seismic catalog SHARE The seismic catalog from the European projectSHARE has been considered Only Moment Magnitude Mw >= 5.5 converted the Mw into intensity Io using the published relationship Only more about 100 events Completed the SHARE catalog with the Events used for attenuation parameters that were NOT in the SHARE catalog
Seismic catalog SHARE finding the intensity I0 Used the SCR relationship to evaluate Io from Mw
Attenuation distributions by courtesy Varini et al., 2013 3°General Meeting UPStrat-MAFA
Attenuation distributions by courtesy Varini et al., 2013 3°General Meeting UPStrat-MAFA
by courtesy Varini et al., 2013 3°General Meeting UPStrat-MAFA
by courtesy Varini et al., 2013 3°General Meeting UPStrat-MAFA
Previous results by Sousa and Oliveira, 2007 Basic Cornell approach
Hazard evaluation Portugalby SASHA2.0.3 50 y AverageReturnTime 20 y AverageReturnTime
Hazard evaluation Portugal by SASHA2.0.3 95 y AverageReturnTime Previousestimates (Sousa and Oliveira, 2007)
Hazard evaluation Portugal by SASHA2.0.3 Previousestimates (Sousa and Oliveira, 2007) 475 y AverageReturnTime
Hazard evaluation Portugal by SASHA2.0.3 Previousestimates (Sousa 2006) 475 y AverageReturnTime
Comparison with previous results Results using the Cornell approach
Hazard evaluation Portugal by SASHA2.0.3 Deggregation Previousestimates (Sousa and Oliveira, 2007) 475 y AverageReturnTime
Conclusions (very preliminary) The use of the SASHA code provides hazard estimates for Portugal that are significantly different from the ones provided by the standard Cornell-McGuire approach These differences also relies on the different use of available information (seismic history, seismotectonic zoning) The ones here illustrated just represent a first preliminary application of SASHA code: local seismic histories will be considered along with a more accurate revision of available apicentral information