1 / 18

CS 201 Compiler Construction

CS 201 Compiler Construction. Lecture 15 Array Dependence Analysis & Loop Parallelization. Loop Parallelization. Goal: Identify loops whose iterations can be executed in parallel on different processors of a shared-memory multiprocessor system. Matrix Multiplication

keren
Download Presentation

CS 201 Compiler Construction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CS 201Compiler Construction Lecture 15 Array Dependence Analysis & Loop Parallelization

  2. Loop Parallelization Goal: Identify loops whose iterations can be executed in parallel on different processors of a shared-memory multiprocessor system. Matrix Multiplication for I = 1 to n do -- parallel for J = 1 to n do -- parallel for K = 1 to n do –- not parallel C[I,J] = C[I,J] + A[I,K]*B[K,J]

  3. Data Dependences S1 δf S2 S1 δa S2 S1 δo S2 δf δa δo S1 S1 S1 S2 S2 S2 Flow Dependence: S1: X = …. S2: … = X Anti Dependence: S1: … = X S2: X = … Output Dependence: S1: X = … S2: X = …

  4. Example: Data Dependences δf δa δo S1 S2 S1 S2 S1 S2 do I = 1, 40 S1: A(I+1) = …. S2: … = A(I-1) enddo do I = 1, 40 S1: A(I-1) = … S2: … = A(I+1) enddo do I = 1, 40 S1: A(I+1) = … S2: A(I-1) = … enddo

  5. Sets of Dependences δf S T Due to A() S(1): A(1) = B(3) + 1 T(1): B(1) = A(0) - 1 S(2): A(2) = B(4) + 1 T(2): B(2) = A(1) - 1 S(3): A(3) = B(5) + 1 T(3): B(3) = A(2) - 1 ………….. S(100): A(100) = B(102) + 1 T(100): B(100) = A(99) - 1 Set of iteration pairs associated with this dependence: {(i,j): j=i+1, 1<=i<=99} Dependence distance: j-i=1 constant in this case. do I = 1, 100 S: A(I) = B(I+2) + 1 T: B(I) = A(I-1) - 1 enddo

  6. Nested Loops • Value computed by S in an iteration (i1,i2) is same as the value used in an iteration (j1,j2): • A(i1,i2)A(j1,j2-1) • iff i1=j1 and i2=j2-1 • S is flow dependent on itself at level 2 (corresponds to inner loop) for fixed value of I1 dependence exists between different iterations of second loop (inner loop). • iteration pairs: • {((i1,i2),(j1,j2)): j1=i1, j2=i2+1, 1<=i1<=100, 1<=i2<=49} level 1: do I1 = 1, 100 level 2: do I2 = 1, 50 S: A(I1,I2) = A(I1,I2-1) + B(I1,I2) enddo enddo

  7. Nested Loops Contd.. • Iteration pairs: • {((i1,i2),(j1,j2)): j1=i1, j2=i2+1, • 1<=i1<=100, 1<=i2<=49} • Dependence distance vector: • (j1-i1,j2-i2) = (0,1) • There is no dependence at level 1.

  8. Computing Dependences - Formulation Can we find iterations (i1,i2) & (j1,j2) such that i1+1=j1; i2+1=j2 and 1<=i1<=8 1<=j1<=8 i1-3<=i2<=i1 j1-3<=j2<=j1 i1-3<=i2<=5 j1-3<=j2<=5 1<=i2<=i1 1<=j2<=j1 1<=i2<=5 1<=j2<=5 and i1, i2, j1, j2 are integers. level 1: do I1 = 1, 8 level 2: do I2 = max(I1-3,1), min(I1,5) A(I1+1,I2+1) = A(I1,I2) + B(I1,I2) enddo enddo

  9. Computing Dependences Contd.. • Dependence testing is an integer programming problem  NP-complete • Solutions trade-off Speed and Accuracy of the solver. • False positives: imprecise tests may report dependences that actually do not exist – conservative is to report false positives but never miss a dependence. • DependenceTests: extreme value test; GCD test; Generalized GCD test; Lambda test; Delta test; Power test; Omega test etc…

  10. Extreme Value Test Approximate test which guarantees that a solution exists but it may be a real solution not an integer solution. Let f: Rn R st f is bounded in a set S contained in Rn Let b be a lower bound of f in S and B be an upper bound of f in S: b ≤ f(ā) ≤ B for any ā ε S contained in Rn For a real number c, the equation f(ā) = c will have solutions iff b ≤ c ≤ B.

  11. Extreme Value Test Contd.. Example: f: R2 R; f(x,y) = 2x + 3y S = {(x,y): 0<=x<=1 & 0<=y<=1} contained in R2 lower bound, b=0; upper bound, B=5 1. Is there a real solution to the equation 2x + 3y = 4 ? Yes. (0.5,1) is a solution, there are many others. 2. Is there an integer solution in S ? No. f(0,0)=0; f(0,1)=3; f(1,0)=2; & f(1,1)=5. For none of the integer points in S, f(x,y)=4. If there are no real solutions, there are no integer solutions. If there are real solutions, then integer solutions may or may not exist.

  12. Extreme Value Test Contd.. Example: DO I = 1, 10 DO J = 1, 10 A[10*I+J-5] = ….A[10*I+J-10]…. 10*I1+J1-5 = 10*I2+J2-10 10*I1-10*I2+J1-J2 = -5 f: R4 R; f(I1,I2,J1,J2) = 10*I1-10*I2+J1-J2 1<=I1,I2,J1,J2<=10; lower bound, b=-99; upper bound, B=+99 since -99 <= -5 <= +99 there is a dependence.

  13. Extreme Value Test Contd..

  14. Extreme Value Test Contd..

  15. Extreme Value Test Contd..

  16. Extreme Value Test Contd..

  17. Nested Loops – Multidimensional Arrays

  18. Nested Loops Contd..

More Related