1 / 21

A Third Option for Canada’s Role in Afghanistan

A Third Option for Canada’s Role in Afghanistan. Joanna Santa Barbara McMaster University Centre for Peace Studies Physicians for Global survival – Canada TRANSCEND – A Peace and Development Organization. Why a Third Option?. 2 options on the table now:

kermit
Download Presentation

A Third Option for Canada’s Role in Afghanistan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Third Option for Canada’s Role in Afghanistan Joanna Santa Barbara McMaster University Centre for Peace Studies Physicians for Global survival – Canada TRANSCEND – A Peace and Development Organization

  2. Why a Third Option? 2 options on the table now: • 1. ‘Search and destroy’ war-fighting + reconstruction to ‘win hearts and minds’ • 2. Troops out now.

  3. What’s the Third Option? • Stop war-fighting • Keep on with peace support operations • Support peace dialogues • Support reconciliation processes

  4. Why should Canadians stop war-fighting? • It’s unwinnable • It’s making things worse - by unnecessary deaths of Afghan and coalition soldiers, and Afghan civilians - by unnecessary infrastructure damage - by strengthening the relationship of the opposition with Al Qaeda - by attracting recruits to the armed opposition • Canada is fighting on one side of a civil war

  5. Conflict Analysis • Before 9/11, vicious civil war: Northern Alliance vs Taliban and Party of Islam • 9/11 -> US-led coalition invades Afghanistan, allies with NA; routs Taliban and Party of Islam • Bonn Agreements 2001: between US and NA. ??????? • Taliban and Party of Islam take to arms. Al Qaeda joins them, as do many disaffected Afghans with various grievances.

  6. Why not troops out now? • Civil war would resume -> large-scale death and destruction • The fragile accomplishments of democracy and development would likely be lost Dr. Sima Samar (Afghan human rights leader): If you’re thinking of removing Canadian troops, please tell me the date, so I can catch the first plane out.

  7. Where does analysis lead us? • Explore peaceful options of bringing armed opposition into democratic process at political level • Support reconciliation process for reintegration of armed opposition people at community level

  8. Is this feasible?How to find out? • .

  9. The work of the McMaster group in Afghanistan: • Directed to war-affected children – mental health and peace education • Directed to war-affected adults – mental health and peace education • Directed to civil servants, politicians of all stripes, journalists, youth, NGOs: - conflict analysis - conflict transformation - nonviolence - reconciliation - peace journalism

  10. Dr. Seddiq Weera’s probe dialogues: • To Taliban leaders • To Party of Islam leaders • To ethnic faction leaders • To Northern Alliance leader • To 10 cabinet Ministers in the Afghan government • To Canadian expatriate Afghans - Peshtun and nonPeshtun, Afghan women’s group

  11. . • All support the Third Option idea

  12. Next steps: • Canadian campaign to persuade government to - stop-war-fighting - resume peace support operations - support peace dialogues - support reconciliation processes

  13. Stop war-fighting • Every death from now on is an unnecessary death • At transfer from US command to ISAF command, end search and destroy action

  14. Resume peace support operations • Could include Nonviolent Peace Force

  15. Support peace dialogues • Does Canada have skills to do this? (Norway in Sri Lanka and Middle East) • Should act with other Middle Powers in coalition or with UN. • Should be informed by peace professionals

  16. Support reconciliation processes • Independent National Commission on Strengthening Peace in Afghanistan. Needs financial and skill support • UN Reconciliation body

  17. Opposition to these ideas: • ‘Spoilers’ in Afghan armed opposition, those who don’t want peace • Hard-line Northern Alliance people who want power to reside mainly with NA. • Canadians who can see only military solutions to violent conflict, and support the ‘war on terror’ • Canadians who don’t understand the dangers of immediate loss of peace support functions • If any success for a negotiated solution looks possible, US administration will not want a ‘bad example’ to suggest a negotiated solution in Iraq.

  18. Next steps for Canadians: • Join developing campaign • See website for articles on Third Option position: www.humanities.mcmaster.ca/peace-health/can-afghan • Visit MP to put these arguments • Write op-eds and letters to editor • React to every Canadian death as unnecessary, because there is a good alternative to war-fighting.

More Related