1 / 9

Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria

A.Avdeev (IDUP , Moscow State University) I.Troitskaia (Moscow State University) Contraceptive behavior in France and Russia: Perspectives of comparative study. Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria.

kermit
Download Presentation

Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A.Avdeev (IDUP, Moscow State University) I.Troitskaia (Moscow State University)Contraceptive behavior in France and Russia: Perspectivesof comparative study

  2. Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria Respondents who answered a question about current contraceptive use were: • In reproductive ages • Physically able to have children(both R and R’s partner) • Non-pregnant (if R=female) or not having a pregnant partner (if R=male)

  3. Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria Respondents who answered a question about current contraceptive use were: • In reproductive ages • Physically able to have children(both R and R’s partner) • Non-pregnant (if R=female) or not having a pregnant partner (if R=male)

  4. Sub-sample disign: Selection criteria Respondents who answered a question about current contraceptive use were: • In reproductive ages • Physically able to have children(both R and R’s partner) • Non-pregnant (if R=female) or not having a pregnant partner (if R=male)

  5. Role of induced abortion in birth control

  6. Contraceptive method mix u = 83.1% u = 83.6%

  7. Logistic regression: pill users (I) • ═══════════════════════════════════ • VariableOdds ratios • FranceRussia • ─────────────────────────────────── • Education • Less than secondary 0.95 0.42*** • Secondary (ref.) 1 1 • More than secondary 0.78** 1.12 • In ed. attainment 2.01** 2.39*** • Employment • Employed (ref.) 1 1 • Unemployed 0.80* 0.65*** • N of observations 2 065 2 299 • ──────────────────────────────────── • controlled for Age, Type of partnership, Parity, Fertility intentions

  8. Logistic regression: pill users (II)

  9. Logistic regression: pill users (III) • ═══════════════════════════════════ • VariableOdds ratios • FranceRussia • ─────────────────────────────────── • Education • Less than secondary 0.47 (0.95) 0.12** (0.42) • Secondary (ref.) 1 1 • More than secondary 2.36 (0.78) 1.82* (1.12) • In ed. attainment 2.29* (2.01) 2.25** (2.39) • ──────────────────────────────────── • - controlled for Age, Type of partnership, Parity, Fertility intentions • - Interaction Age*Education

More Related