1 / 18

Structure of the presentation

Flexibility in the Labour market – Some Gender Issues Professor Dr Ronald McQuaid Employment Research Institute, Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK Presented at Matera, Basilicata, Italy 22-23 May 2008. Structure of the presentation. Background – Gender and Employment

kerri
Download Presentation

Structure of the presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Flexibility in the Labour market – Some Gender Issues Professor Dr Ronald McQuaidEmployment Research Institute, Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UKPresented at Matera, Basilicata, Italy 22-23 May 2008

  2. Structure of the presentation • Background – Gender and Employment • Not so much female - male as ‘Mothers versus the rest’ • Employer Attitudes • Conclusions

  3. Male-Female labour market differences • The ‘family gap’ - differences in behaviour and labour market disadvantage are connected to the presence, and ages, of children of parents • Male and female FT wages converging in UK but part-time wages diverging (e.g. Paull; Booth and van Ours). • Hourly earnings of part-time females are 25% below those of full-time females (due nearly all to occupational segregation Manning and Petrongolo (2008). • Part-time work especially linked to children for women

  4. Females across EU have lower activity rates Economic activity rates (%) by gender, EU25, 2001 EA rate (male) 78.5 EA rate (female) 60.7 EA rate (total) 69.3 Source: Eurostat Regio database table UN3WPOP

  5. Why parents work part-time or not at all? • Is this a supply and/or demand phenomenon? • Supply-side influences - parents wishing to remain with their children when young, cost of childcare etc. • Demand-side influences –discrimination or employer preferences

  6. Questions and methodology • How to determine if employers are biased against those with childcare responsibilities, gender, age? • Possible methodological problems if ask them: unconscious biases, respondents confounding various potential employee characteristics, social or legal pressures on not appearing biased • So there are empirical and theoretical questions

  7. Research Methodology • Stated preference methods have been used extensively to investigate the value of non-market goods or services • Hardly been used in Labour Markets (e.g. pensions/ retirement) • Advantages – ‘measures’ preferences of employers, controls for ‘other’ key variables (using scenarios), including perhaps some unobserved heterogeneity

  8. Choices for employers • - gender (male/female) • - childcareresponsibilities for: children aged under 5 years; children aged 5 to 11; or no childcare responsibilities at all, i.e. no children under 12 • - age: 25 or less; 25 to 39; 40 to 49; or 50+ • Combining these characteristic together gives 24 unique applicant profiles which were paired and presented in 11 choice cards.

  9. Summary of results • Employer preferences were found to favour those who are: between the ages of 25 and 39; with no childcare responsibilities; and women. • Employer preferences against those: having childcare responsibilities for children under 5 years old; and being over 50 years old. • Stated Preference techniques for such labour market research proved very useful in identifying attitudes towards potential recruits.

  10. Working for Families – Some differences between parents • 4 year policy 2004-08 • 25,000 disadvantaged parents (lone parents, low income, living in an area of multiple deprivation). • Over 15,000 moved into, or improved, work, training, education • 80% females. • 71% lone parents (compared to 7% in Scotland).

  11. Working for Families • More likely to move into work, major training or education if: • the person has qualifications (SVQ level 2 or above). • being in either part time or full time education • having English as their first language, • being a lone parent

  12. Working for Families • Less likely to move into work, major training or education if: • pregnant, • having more than two children; • being over 45 years old; • being unemployed over 2 months; • having other forms of stress (such as drug dependency); • living in accommodation that is not owner occupied (esp. if in hostel or supported care).

  13. Conclusions • The Tyranny of Aggregation – for equality we must separate policies to support the most disadvantaged – i.e. generally mothers of young children, rather than treating all females the same (although this is not to deny that some discrimination still takes place). • Even among mothers however, in terms of employment there seem to be some groups that are particularly disadvantaged.

  14. Thank you for listening r.mcquaid@napier.ac.uk www2.napier.ac.uk/depts/eri/home.htm

  15. Illustration: Example of a Choice Card presented to respondents

  16. Random parameters logit model. 52 respondents, N = 572. McFadden Psuedo-R2 = 0.18.

More Related