220 likes | 353 Views
The North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory. Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services Testing Section EC Conference/July 2001. Why was it developed? Who ’s Eligible? History and Timeline What is it? When is it completed?. How to complete it?
E N D
The North Carolina Alternate Assessment Academic Inventory Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability Services Testing Section EC Conference/July 2001
Why was it developed? Who’s Eligible? History and Timeline What is it? When is it completed? How to complete it? Where do you get it? Changes for 2001-02 school year ABCs • North Carolina Department of Public Instruction • Division of Accountability Services • July 20, 2001 What will I cover today?
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction • Division of Accountability Services • July 20, 2001 Why was the NCAAAI Developed? • Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 1997 • All students, including those with IEPs or Section 504 plans, must participate in the statewide testing program. • NC Alternate Assessment Portfolio (NCAAP) • NC Computerized Adaptive Testing System (NCCATS) Accommodation
Which students are Eligible? • Must have a current Individualized Education Program (IEP) or Section 504 Plan • Must be following the NC Standard Course of Study (NCSCS) {important} • Unable to access statewide testing with or without accommodations {important} • Must have an assigned grade level of 3-8
Who decides? • The IEP Team determines student participation in the NCAAAI and the grade level at which the student will be assessed. • Different options
History of the NCAAAI • Late Fall 2000 • It was determined that a small group of students could not be supported by the NCAAP or NCCATs • Late December 2000/Development began • Discussion/Conflict concerning implementation dates (Spring 2001 vs. Fall 2001)
Examples of Students needing a separate Alternate Assessment: • Newly-blinded students who have not mastered Braille • Students with learning disabilities needing assessment below the third grade • Students with serious physical disabilities that prevent participation
Who Helped in the Development and Improvement? • NCDPI Exceptional Children Division • NCDPI Division of Instructional Services • NCDPI Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section • Regional Accountability Coordinators • Assessor Input (NCAAAI Review Sheet) {important} • Technical Outreach for Public Schools (NCSU)
March 2001 Inventories available on-line (TNN) Order system up April 2001 Intact notebooks are shipped June 2001 Notebooks returned to the NCDPI July 2001 2001-02 Inventories available on-line (TNN) August 2001 Reports and Notebooks returned to LEAs 2001-02 shipped Timeline for the NCAAAI
What will be Different in 2001-02 from 2000-01? • Teacher/Assessor feedback • Descriptors/Scales • Less repetition/Fewer forms • More training/More detailed Administrative Guide • LEAs do not return the notebooks • No Grade 10 Inventory for HSCT
What is the NCAAAI? • Checklist of competencies scored using individual scales for each content area (new) • Reading (Grades K-8) • Mathematics (Grades K-8) • Writing (Grades 4 & 7) • Notebook (binder) format • Collection of evidence to support scores
When are the Inventories Scored? • Three times per year • First month of school=Baseline data • First month of the second semester of school=Mid-Year Winter data • Last month of school=Final Spring data • Evidence is collected to support Final Spring scores.
How is the Inventory Scored? • The assessor uses the Description of Student Performance for a particular content area to give each competency a score from 1-8 or NA (not applicable). • Using the individual competency scores, determine the subheading score(s). • Using the subheading score(s), determine the Overall Score.
Assessed On-Grade Level: Level 4 (7-8) Level 3 (5-6) Level 2 (3-4) Level 1 (1-2) Assessed Off-Grade Level: Student may only receive a Level 1 or Level 2 Achievement Levels: Final Spring Overall Score
Examples of Evidence • Local Tests (LT) • Samples of Student Work (SW) • Teacher Observations (TO) • Teacher-Made Tests (TT) • Audio Tapes (AN) • Other (specify)
Data Collection 2001-02 • Scores will be transferred to student scannable sheets during the last month of school • Local Test Coordinators will scan the sheets • Data will be transferred to the NCDPI during the end-of-year process • Student Notebooks will be stored locally for six months (randomly request)
How do LEAs order the NCAAAI? • Local procedure to collect information (number participating) • Number of notebook binders • Number of inventories by content area (R, M, or W) and assessed grade level (K-8) • Information is passed to the LEA Test Coordinator who orders on-line (TNN) • Materials will be shipped to the LEA TC • School distribution (by secure means) is a local procedure
Training? • Train-the-Trainer Model • NCDPI Trains Regional Accountability Coordinators (RACs) • RACs train the LEA Test Coordinator • LEA TC trains the EC Director • Training for local staff is a collaboration between Testing and EC personnel (local decision)
2000-01 Pilot Study Not included in School Accountability Number of students participating will be included in Volume II. 2001-2002 Operational administration Pending data analysis Performance Composite Growth Component NCAAAI and the ABCs
2000-01 Pilot Study Not used for Student Accountability Standard at Grade 5 2001-2002 Operational administration Pending data analysis Not yet determined for Grades 3, 5 & 8 NCAAAI and Student Accountability
More Information • Testing Section Website: www.NCPublicSchools.org/accountability/testing • LEA Test Coordinator may contact Regional Accountability Coordinator for questions