1 / 11

ALTERNATIVE PUBLISHING MODELS

ALTERNATIVE PUBLISHING MODELS. CRKN AGM Toronto, Ontario Sept.25, 2007. Alternative Publishing. More inclusive than open access Conventional publishing includes commercial and society publishers. Models. Open access variations Author fees Co-operative model Endowment.

Download Presentation

ALTERNATIVE PUBLISHING MODELS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ALTERNATIVE PUBLISHING MODELS CRKN AGM Toronto, Ontario Sept.25, 2007

  2. Alternative Publishing • More inclusive than open access • Conventional publishing includes commercial and society publishers

  3. Models • Open access variations • Author fees • Co-operative model • Endowment

  4. CRKN’s RFP Process • Procurement terms • Financial requirements • Business and operational requirements • RFP expertise • Risk assessment • Size issue • Model license • Evaluation Criteria and scoring

  5. 1. Significant policy developments in the Canadian scholarly publishing environment? • CIHR open access policy • Synergies • SSHRC open access pilot • Open Medicine, also Canadian Journal of Sociology

  6. 2. Can CRKN’s RFP process be modified? • Some alternative publishers are sufficiently mature • RFP-lite

  7. 3. Is a new evaluation process required? • Non-trivial • New procedures, criteria, etc. • Implications for organizational resources

  8. 4. Outcomes of a new evaluation process? • Memberships, investments, donations • “Stamp of approval” • Venture capital role, co-development

  9. 5. What is CRKN’s overarching goal? • Buying club • Tranformative role

  10. 6. Is CRKN the most appropriate group? • CRKN strengths • Conflict of interest • Dilution • A new CRKN “division”

  11. 7. How much risk? • Much higher risk • Indirect and more long term returns • CRKN ability to assume collective risk

More Related