460 likes | 794 Views
Main idea. Against separation of nature and spiritConventional idea of God and the world as separateAvatar sees the planet as the avatar of the Goddess, EywaJust as the humans, such as Jake, enter the avatar" of a Navi. Hegel provides philosophical concepts that support these images of the film
E N D
1. Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature as the Avatar of Spirit 1
2. Main idea Against separation of nature and spirit
Conventional idea of God and the world as separate
Avatar sees the planet as the avatar of the Goddess, Eywa
Just as the humans, such as Jake, enter the “avatar” of a Navi.
Hegel provides philosophical concepts that support these images of the film
Recall: Hegel on the relation between philosophy and art, philosophy and religion 2
3. Spirit descends, incarnates Nature: spirit in unconsciousness
1) Devolution of spirit: God “incarnates” and so produces Nature
2) Evolution from nature to the human being
Dialectic of individual plant and plant species as a contradiction that presses toward its solution: the human spirit is implicit in organic nature
But where does the plant come from? How does life “emerge” from inorganic bodies? 3
4. 3 Stages of human society Evolution of humanity from
1) Spontaneous, unconscious unity with nature of hunter-gatherers
The Navi in Avatar; the Ewoks in Star Wars
2) Separation from nature and each other of ego-centered society
Capitalist corporation seeking to exploit Unobtainium for profit
Death Star as technological power over the galaxy in Star Wars
3) Overcoming of separation by returning to unity: of people with each other, and of humanity with the natural world
Jake goes native!
Ewoks unite with Rebels
4
5. Theoretical issue of devolution/evolution Why not just evolution?
Going from simple inorganic beings to complex biological and social levels of reality
=theory of “emergence”: each new level of complexity gives distinctive phenomena, higher level “emergent” realities
E.g., two gases with simple structure: hydrogen and oxygen combine to produce a more complex entity which is a liquid, not a gas
H2 + O = H20 5
6. Higher from lower? But how can the higher level come from the lower one?
How can two gases produce a liquid?
Empiricist reply: they just do; that’s what happens
How can beings moved by external, mechanical causes give rise, by increasing complexity, to beings with free, teleological motion?
I.e., human beings acting to realize goals
Hobbes: It’s impossible, because a deterministic process can only produce more deterministic processes
Emergent materialists: it just happens because of the emergent properties of the complexity 6
7. Potential for higher in lower Hegel: Higher levels can come from lower levels only if there is a potential of the higher already in the lower: which can be detected on the lower level itself
E.g., we see the tension between individual and species in organic life
The lower level implicitly contains the higher
A gas is potentially a liquid
The seemingly mechanistic level of inorganic beings is
implicitly teleological,
contains a degree of freedom 7
8. Deepening our understanding A deeper understanding of the mechanical level will show this
Gases become liquid at lower temperatures
So the combination of the two gases must lower their temperature (the rapidity of their oscillations)
The higher level of development provides clues for a deeper understanding the lower level, which must contain the possibility of the higher 8
9. Deeper position: Devolution The higher level of Spirit evolves from the lower level, because Spirit first devolves to produce the lower level
Thus in the rock, in the inert “material” object, there is already a presence of spirit
A deeper analysis of the nature of inorganic beings will show that this is true
(we will come back to this) 9
10. Science and the avatar An “Avatar” defined by the scientists as a remote controlled device
Jake “drives” the avatar
Like an automobile
But the experience: Jake leaves one body and enters another
The feet of the avatar are his feet:
He (his consciousness) is in the avatar; it is not a remote object controlled from afar 10
11. Empirical science Describes consciousness as an effect of the body (materialism)
But the experience is one of being outside one body, and in another one
Recall The Matrix: the mind enters a simulated body
Hence, the consciousness, the spirit, must be separable from the body.
Science: this is “pagan voodoo,” like the beliefs of the Navi (says scientist Grace Augustine)
Comment by director: she smokes
11
12. Mind and body Spirit/consciousness is not something external to its avatar:
Like a driver in his car
The avatar allows Jake’s consciousness to act on and in the planet
He leaves one body, with one life, and enters another, for a different life
He comes to see his life in the avatar as his true life; and that in his original, crippled body as illusory:
“Everything is backwards now. Like out there is the true world, and in here is the dream.”
Theme of dream and reality of The Matrix
12
13. Jake is no scientist He dissected a frog once
He tells Mo’at that he is an “empty vessel”
i.e., he is not biased by science
She says that the scientists don’t understand anything
Scene:
Grace and her assistant are impressed by digital readouts of some organism
Reduction to microstructure
Jake is amazed at the awesome beauty of the plants themselves in their unreduced existence 13
14. Two theoretical approaches to nature 1) Grace reduces the macro-level of the plants and animals to the micro-structures
The higher level is founded on the lower one: from bottom to top
2) Jake begins with the visible, tangible plant or animal, and admires its individuality
Thus he is open a reverse approach: from top to bottom
A descent from the Spirit, Eywa, to the planet as her embodiment 14
15. Hegel’s dialectic 1) Spirit descends, “devolves,” to the level of matter/bodies
This makes possible the return process
If spirit was in no way present in inorganic matter, how could it ever arise from it?
2) Then spirit evolves new forms of matter/body that are better and better vehicles of spirit 15
16. 3 Stages of Evolution 1) Inert things, seemingly separate from each other and moved externally
= Model of conventional scientific thought
2) Life forms, animate beings
The individual exists only in dialectical relation to others
Individual and species in dialectical opposition
3) Human beings
Begin as kinship societies immersed in the natural order
Then egotism arises, separating individuals from each other and from nature:
gives rise to the concept of nature as consisting of separate entities:
nature is modeled on egotistical structure of human society
16
17. Theory and Practice Two theoretical approaches
From microstructure up (Grace)
From macrostructure down (Jake): ultimately, from Eywa to the planet, her avatar
Two practical approaches
Nature as exploitable resource for economic goals
Selfridge
Nature as basis of life for native people
Neytiri 17
18. Cunning of reason The original people (hunter-gatherers) are dependent on nature
She is hungry and needs to eat
They learn however to master their environment to achieve their goals
The “cunning of reason”: make nature, while still remaining nature, work for our goals,
The Navi tame the flying birds for transportation
This is not control over nature,
but a trick of human cunning whereby the natural world unfolds its own potentials while achieving the goals of humans 18
19. Dialectical analysis “The negation of myself which I suffer within me in hunger,
is at the same time present as an other than myself,
as something to be consumed;
my act is to annul this contradiction by making the other identical with myself,
or by restoring my self-unity through sacrificing the thing.” 19
20. The Self and the Other 1) dependence on nature, on something “other” than oneself: experienced as separation, disconnection
I am divided from myself: hunger is an emptiness within me: “the negation of myself”
And from the other: there is something outside of me that is necessary for me to be me
Two things: myself, and the other: one is negative, the other positive 20
21. Connection 2) connect with that other
The separate thing is sacrificed in its independence, in its separation
I am whole once again: I am myself through the other
> I sense my unity with the outside world as the completion of myself 21
22. Holism The Na’vi understand the holistic connection between self and other, People and Nature.
Everything for them is interconnected in a circle of life.
There is nothing fundamentally dead, expendable, exploitable, nothing purely separate
Parker Selfridge complains about this holism: “You throw a stick in the air around here, it’s gonna land on some sacred fern, for Christ’s sake.” 22
23. Reciprocal sacrifice The material sacrifice of the thing requires a reciprocal sacrifice: a spiritual one, to restore the unity
“I see you Brother, and thank you. Your spirit goes with Eywa. Your body stays behind to become part of the People.”
It is the alien Sky People who destroy without renewing 23
24. Knowledge of the thing in itself Science is ostensibly about knowing the thing as it is in itself
The thing should be studied in its independent existence
Without interference from the scientist
But empiricist science reduces the living individuality of the thing to its micro-structures
separate entities, as small as possible
changing the thing “in itself” to a thing “for us” 24
25. Impoverishment by thought Hegel: “The more thought enters into our representation of things, the less do they retain their naturalness, their singularity and immediacy. The wealth of natural forms, in all their infinitely manifold configuration, is impoverished by the all-pervading power of thought, their vernal life and glowing colors die and fade away. 25
26. A murky northern fog “The rustle of Nature’s life is silenced in the stillness of thought; her abundant life, wearing a thousand delightful shapes, shrivels into arid forms and shapeless generalities resembling a murky northern fog.... In thinking things, we transform them into something universal; but things are singular, and the Lion as Such does not exist. 26
27. Kierkegaard’s critique of Hegel Recall Kierkegaard’s criticism of the universals of Kant and Hegel
They leave out individuality which contradicts universality (reason)
Here Hegel clearly stands up for individuality against the abstract universality of empirical science
The individual and the species are two “moments” of a dialectical opposition: “the concrete universal” 27
28. A lot of connections Grace to Selfridge:
[T]here’s some kind of electrochemical communication between the roots of the trees. Like the synapses between neurons. Each tree has ten to the fourth connections to the trees around it, and there are ten to the twelfth trees on Pandora....
Selfridge: Which is a lot I’m guessing.
28
29. Just goddamn trees Grace: That’s more connections than the human brain. You get it? It’s a network. It’s a global network. And the Na’vi can access it....
Selfridge: What the hell have you people been smoking out there? They’re just goddamn trees.
29
30. What each sees Grace sees micro-structures with great complexity
Giving rise to emergent qualities of communication throughout the planet
Grace thinks she has discovered the scientific truth of interconnection that the Navi hold to in their religion of Eywa
Selfridge sees “goddamn trees”: the abstract universal that is the same in each individual
Neither sees the individuality of the tree or plant or animal that Jake sees 30
31. Empiricist science analyzes to understand Hegel: “If we examine a flower, for example, our understanding notes its peculiar qualities; chemistry dismembers and analyzes it. In this way, we separate color, shape of the leaves, citric acid, etheric oil, carbon, hydrogen, etc.; and now we say that the plant consists of all these parts. 31
32. Goethe’s commentary in Faust Hegel cites Goethe’s Faust: “If you want to describe life and gather its meaning,
To drive out its spirit must be your beginning,
Then though fast in your hand lie the parts one by one
The spirit that linked them, alas is gone ...”
32
33. Don’t kill the spirit Nature is more than a multiplicity of individuals and of elements
The unity, the individuality, of nature as a whole must not be killed in the pursuit of knowledge
Kant recognized this: our way of doing science through analysis into separate “objects” in time and space can not give us reality as it is in itself
Science thus goes along with the exploitation of the earth as consisting of dead, disenchanted world
Morpheus: Welcome, to the desert of the real. 33
34. The Romantic alternative The recognition that analytic science kills the spirit of nature leads to the Romantic response
Reject reason, rational science
Turn to intuition, feeling
Return to pre-modern civilization
“This is tsaheylu—the bond,” Neytiri says. “Feel her heartbeat, her breath. Feel her strong legs.”
34
35. Free play of fancy is not truth Hegel: There is something lofty in this approach, but it leads to the belief that there are
“favoured ones, seers to whom God imparts true knowledge and wisdom in sleep, or that man, even without being so favoured, can at least by faith in it [i.e., in our immediate oneness with Nature], transport himself into a state where the inner side of Nature is immediately revealed to him, and where he need only let fancies occur to him, i.e., give free play to his fancy, in order to declare prophetically what is true.” 35
36. Early societies and Romanticism The Romantics seek to go back to pre-modern societies, like that of the Navi
Feeling as important to both
But the Navi live in a complex, stable social order with traditional rules of authority and beliefs
The Romantic wants individual freedom for the fancies arising out of his own feelings
These are very different outlooks 36
37. Hegel’s reply: dialectical reason Logical principle of analytic thought: A = A
Principle of identity
E.g., A tree is (just a goddamn) tree
Leads to the dissection of reality into the smallest possible elements that can be separately identified
And then the reconstruction of reality on this basis
A complexity of tiny identities seems to produce something different: an interdependent whole
Selfridge: what have you been smoking? 37
38. Dialectical logic The hunter is a hunter, not a deer
Two separate entities
Deeper analysis
The hunter is a hunter only through what he is not, the deer
Logical form: A is A, only through not-A
Dialectical identity: A = A, –(-A) 38
39. What’s next? Not a return to hunter-gatherer societies
We are beyond this origin
We must transcend
the abstract understanding of modern science
The egotism of modern civilization 39
40. What is the planet Pandora? 1) an individual in its own right
2) a universal, the whole in which all the rocks, plants, and animals are contained
Not as isolated, separate beings, but
As interconnected “organs” of the totality 40
41. Stages of the history of thought 1) An instinctive sense of interconnectedness, characteristic of early peoples
2a) Analytical science which separates the individual from the totality, in order to grasp it more easily
> a metaphysics of separate entities connected to analytic thinking 41
42. 2b) Transitional stage: But the deeper science goes in studying the separate entities, the more it is forced to recognize their unity
Grace’s unsuccessful attempt to explain interconnectedness of the planet Pandora
But she doesn’t believe the planet really is a unity governed by a consciousness
3) Hence the need for a new way of thinking arises: dialectical reason 42
43. Contradiction in modern science 1) Law of inertia: everything is separate from everything else, and changes its motion only as a result of outside causes
2) Law of gravity: everything acts on everything else: universal interconnectedness
Newton could not understand how separate beings could affect one another through empty space: no evidence of material causes
His reply: God/Spirit, must connect the separate beings according to the law of gravity 43
44. Dialectical unity of inertia and Gravity Hegel: “Gravitation directly contradicts the law of inertia; for, by virtue of the former, matter strives to get away out of itself to an Other.”
1) The inorganic being, a rock, negates the negativity (its apparent passivity—rule by outside causes—stemming from their apparent separateness)
2) and “involves” the other, what it is not, in itself: attraction, or gravity 44
45. Deeper understanding of inorganic matter 1) Inorganic level of matter is only superficially a collection of separate entities moved by outside causes
A deeper understanding shows that they are connected to each other by a universal “Force” or Spirit
Which is hidden, invisible
But manifested in the law of gravity
2) This connectedness gives rise to organic beings, individuals that master their limited environments
They die eventually
But the species, the larger totality, lives on
3) Human species being arises from this tension of individual and species
45
46. Stages in the evolution of nature 1) Separate inorganic entity
A rock,
A hydrogen atom
Connects with other entities
Through universal gravity
Through chemical bonding of hydrogen and oxygen
2) Organic level: dialectic of plant and species
3) Human level: unity of individual and species giving rise to human history
From unconscious feeling of connection in kinship order
Through separate egos in struggle
To Spirit: I = We, We = I 46