1 / 20

Light jet energy scale determination with Top events

Light jet energy scale determination with Top events. E. Cogneras, D. Pallin , S. Binet. Purpose. The absolute energie scale will be know at the level of few percent at LHC start The calibration function varies with E and  => Get the light jet energy scale such that

kesia
Download Presentation

Light jet energy scale determination with Top events

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Light jet energy scale determination with Top events E. Cogneras, D. Pallin, S. Binet

  2. Purpose • The absolute energie scale will be know at the level of few percent at LHC start • The calibration function varies with E and  • => Get the light jet energy scale such that E jet  E parton AOD Cone 04 Calibration function  (Ejet) = Eparton / Ejet EPart / E An example: Rome AOD  (Ejet) = 1. to 1.1 ‘cone 04’ E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  3. Purpose • Absolute jet scale essential for the Top mass measurement • A 1% miscalib induces a 0.9 GeV shift on the Top mass • => in-situ calibration for Top • calibration usable outside Top studies? M(jjb) M(lb) ATLFAST 1 year @ 1033 D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  4. j1 n W1 W2 l(e,m) j2 t1 t2 b1 b2 How • Use the well defined W mass to rescale the jet energies from the W decay Wj1 j2 such that MW=MWPDG • Dont use any hypothesis for the calibration function • Dont rely on MC • difficulty : 2 jets with different energy, 1 # 2 • Select an enriched W sample from events D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  5. Reconstructed W (cone 04) • AOD • ATLFAST • MW ~ 76 GeV ,  ~ 7 GeV • 40<E<500 GeV • AOD ~ ATLFAST except cosjj MW E Cosjj D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  6. (1-costh) (1-cosjj) • AOD • ATLFAST Reconstructed W (cone 04) • AOD : <M jet>~ 10 GeV • ATLFAST: jets are massless • AOD and ATLFAST: jets are miscalibrated deviation for cosjj>0 Mj Cosjj Eth / E E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  7. (1-costh) (1-cosm) • AOD • ATLFAST Reconstructed W (cone 04) • AOD= Angle between the 2 jets recovered, shift only due to E miscalib. • ATLFAST: jets are massless, angle is not accurately defined => ~2 GeV shift on MW Cosm D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  8. Method 1 to extract the E scale • compute R for k bins in E • apply kfactors on R and recompute R n times => R EPart / E AOD W Recons. No comb BKG E E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  9. Method1 Results after recalibration AOD 4000 W Recons. No comb BKG • Function found with any ‘a priori’ hypothesis before EPart / E Mw E after D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  10. Method1 Results on Z+jets • Use the AOD Top sample to correct the jet energies of the AOD Z+jet sample • TOP 12000 jets, Z+jet 8000 jets • Apply same cuts on jets energies • => Top light jet scale works for all light jets Top Z+jets + EPart / E EPart / E + After calib ‘Top’ E E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  11. W selection • Selection for optimal mass measurement • Clean W sample with • 2 b tag • Cuts on Mt or Mt-Mw • Selection for commissioning • No b tag, cut on Mjlv ( see ivo van Vulpen talk) • Reduced b tag (with lower efficiency or 1btag only), cut on angles => W sample ~85% purity (see D Pallin talk Slovakia) • W sample ~85% purity (see D Pallin talk Slovakia) D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  12. Comb. BKG W selection • Selection for optimal mass measurement AOD ATLFAST Mw 3 days at L=1033 D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  13. Method1 with comb. BKG • Preliminary result with 1000 W +bkg evts • Calibration marginaly sensible to BKG (purity=85%) EPart / E AOD Very preliminary To reach the 1% precision on the E scale, 10000 W should be enough = 1month data taking 3 days at L=1033 E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  14. Method2 • If the angle between the 2 jets is not well determined (see ATLFAST example), Method 1 is not usable • Mw calibrated with Meth 1 not constant in function of cos ATLFAST Mwcorr/Mw cosjj D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  15. Method2 • Need to • To disentangle the contributions from cosjj and E • To evaluate separately the correction E1 & E2 • perform a fit to constraint MW to MwPDG • evt by evt, compute 1E and 2E for the two jets and deduce E =f( E) • Allow E,  ,  to move within detector resolution D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  16. Extract PEAK values for various energies FSR contrib =Ep/Ej  (E=Ei) Deduced function  = Eparton / Ejet=f(E) E (GeV) Method2 D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  17. Method2 Results ATLFAST EPart / E E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  18. Method3 • Perform also a fit to constraint MW to MwPDG • Mix meth 1 and 2 • Constraints not given through the detector resolutions • define E corrections factor per bins in E • constraint cosjj =1 for cosjj =-1 • Mw corrected by E or cosjj in window [Mw : Mwpdg] D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  19. Method3 Results • same results as Meth 2 • works on TOY MC • No cosjj correction found by the fit to AOD data EPart / E EPart / E After calib E E D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

  20. Conclusions • New methods investigated to get in-situ the light jet calibration for Top mass measurement • Preliminary results from AOD • AOD and ATLFAST comparable for top studies • 1% precision on the jet scale seems achievable in 1-2 month of data taking at 1033 • Top in-situ Light jet scale seems usable for all jet (if calibration done for jets with same selection) • Futur • Run all AOD files +physical BKG • Detailed look to jet algorithms D. Pallin Rome workshop June 2005

More Related