260 likes | 288 Views
Chapter 10 homework. Numbers 4, 7, 11, 12 and 18. Chapter 11. From Short-Run to Long-Run Equilibrium: The Model in Action. Changing Aggregate Demand and Short-Run Aggregate Supply.
E N D
Chapter 10 homework • Numbers 4, 7, 11, 12 and 18
Chapter 11 From Short-Run to Long-Run Equilibrium: The Model in Action
Changing Aggregate Demand and Short-Run Aggregate Supply • Basic changes in aggregate demand or short-run aggregate supply can explain four basic macroeconomic outcomes in the short run: • Increasing aggregate demand • Growing economy with a higher price level • Decreasing aggregate demand • Recession with lower price levels • Increasing short-run aggregate supply • Growing economy with a lower price level • Decreasing short-run aggregate supply • Recession with a higher price level
Changing Aggregate Demand • Growing economy with a rising price level. • increase in aggregate demand • Business cycle expansion: • Demand-Side Inflation • AD shifts to the right increasing prices • Example: U.S. recovery of the late 1990s. • US consumers were optimistic, stock prices and home prices were rising (people felt wealthy), CPI increased by about 10%, unemployment fell from 6 to 4%
Figure 11.1(a) Impact of Changing Aggregate Demand on Short-Run Equilibrium
Changing Aggregate Demand • Recession with a falling price level. • decrease in aggregate demand • Example: The Great Depression of the 1930s • Consumption collapsed, taxes went up and government spending was cut (to balance budget), trade wars reduced exports • GDP fell by 27%, unemployment reached 24%, price levels fell by 25% • This situation is relatively rare today as governments have tools to prevent a decline in aggregate demand.
Figure 11.1(b) Impact of Changing Aggregate Demand on Short-Run Equilibrium
Changing Short-Run Aggregate Supply • Growing economy with a falling price level. • increase in short-run aggregate supply • Example: Hong Kong, Mali, Libya, Bahrain and Oman all experienced lower prices and higher real GDP for at least one year from 2001 to 2004. • Most often results from new investment, which increases productivity.
Figure 11.2(a) Impact of Changing Short-Run Aggregate Supply on Short-Run Equilibrium
Changing Short-Run Aggregate Supply • Recession with a rising price level. • decrease in short-run aggregate supply • Usual pattern of recessions in the United States over the past 30 years. • Sometimes called stagflation, or supply-side inflation • Can be caused by increases in business taxes, declining productivity, pessimistic expectations and higher energy prices.
Figure 11.2(b) Impact of Changing Short-Run Aggregate Supply on Short-Run Equilibrium
Can we do it? • Number 2 • From 1948 to 1949, the US price level fell from 24.1 to 23.8 while real GDP fell from $1.64 trillion to $1.63 trillion. Graph this situation using a change in either aggregate demand alone or short-run aggregate supply alone. What economic phenomenon does this illustrate?
Answer??? • This is a demand-side or spending recession, as prices and GDP both fall from a reduction in aggregate demand.
The Long-Run Model of Aggregate Demand and Aggregate Supply • Illustrates a self-adjusting mechanism that can move the macroeconomy to the full employment level of real GDP. • Based on the classical school of economic thought
The Classical School of Economic Thought • Developed as the English economy was entering in the Industrial Revolution. • The first Classical economists wrote during the period from 1776 to 1850. • Typified by Adam Smith in The Wealth of Nations (1776), classical economists believed the economy achieves full employment equilibrium in the long run. • Old…but some economists still believe in it
The Basic Beliefs of the Classical School • Usually we are at or very close to the full employment level of real GDP. • The economy will tend to generate and maintain full employment without government intervention. • Laissez faire • Let do, let go, let pass • Any deviations will tend be minor, temporary, and self-correcting.
Basis for the Long-Run Model • The long-run belief in full employment depends on three observations regarding the nature of the macro-economy: • Say’s Law • The loanable funds market • Price and wage flexibility
Say’s Law • The belief the supply creates its own demand • The act of supplying goods to an economy generates enough income to buy all those same goods and services.
The Loanable Funds Market • Say’s law is too simple • It ignores saving. • If households save a portion of their incomes, then some of the goods produced in the economy would not be purchased. As a result: • Inventories would accumulate. • Firms would cut back on production. • Unemployment would increase.
The Loanable Funds Market (cont’d) • The loanable funds market converts saving into spending by bringing “savers” and “borrowers” together • Savers are the suppliers of loanable funds. • Seek the highest possible interest rate. • Borrowers are demanders of loanable funds. • Seek the lowest possible interest rate.
The Loanable Funds Market (cont’d) • Establishes the equilibrium interest rate • Quantity of funds savers want to save is exactly equal to the quantity of funds that borrowers demand.
Price and Wage Flexibility • Wages and prices are fully and freely flexible. • They are equally likely to go up or down. • This flexibility is crucial to the economy’s long-run self-adjustment process.
Price and Wage Flexibility (cont’d) • Suppose that the quantity of aggregate demand is less than the quantity of aggregate supply: • Inventories increase. • Some producers cut the price of their product. • Workers will accept cuts in wages or benefits in order to keep their jobs.
Life Lessons • Givebacks and flexible wages: • Worker’s wages generally do not decrease. • Only rarely do workers in a struggling industry voluntarily accept pay cuts. • Airline industry • In recent years, companies have been asking workers to give up some of their benefits to maintain competitiveness.