1 / 7

Uncertainty Reduction Theory VS. Social Penetration Processing Theory

Uncertainty Reduction Theory VS. Social Penetration Processing Theory. By: Carri Rush. Uncertainty Reduction Theory. What Does it mean?. Making sense of who the other person is Used to gain knowledge and create understanding Questioning Finding similarities and differences

kevyn
Download Presentation

Uncertainty Reduction Theory VS. Social Penetration Processing Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Uncertainty Reduction TheoryVS.Social Penetration Processing Theory By: Carri Rush

  2. Uncertainty Reduction Theory What Does it mean? • Making sense of who the other person is • Used to gain knowledge and create understanding • Questioning • Finding similarities and differences • Analyzing their reactions • Talking to them

  3. Social Penetration Processing Theory What does it mean? • Process that moves a relationship from non-intimate to an intimate stage • Self-disclosure or sharing parts of oneself to or with another

  4. Comparing

  5. Contrasting Issues • Makes sense through a series of analyzing steps and process direct toward the individual. Seeking information from the person. • Builds relationship on disclosing information about oneself to the individual to help build and create a relationship

  6. Effects on PR

  7. References • Bane, C. (2010). Self-Disclosure through Weblogs and Perceptions of Online and 'Real-life' Friendships among Female Bloggers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 13(2), 131-139. • Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2011). Emotional and Interpersonal Consequences of Self-Disclosure in a Lived, Online Interaction. Journal Of Social & Clinical Psychology, 30(7), 732-759. • Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsycholosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1-51). New York: Academic Press. • Feeney, B. (2009). Affiliation with new peer acquaintances during two initial social support interactions. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 489-506. • Hogg, M. A. (2009). Managing Self-Uncertainty Through Group Identification. Psychological Inquiry, 20(4), 221-224. • Jones, Dr. Brenda. Capstone for Communications & PR. USA: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Book.

More Related