1 / 21

Wayne Higgins and Wei Shi Climate Prediction Center / NCEP

Relationships Between Gulf of California Moisture Surges and Tropical Cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Basin. Wayne Higgins and Wei Shi Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 29 th Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop Madison, WI 18-22 October, 2004. Objectives.

kevyn
Download Presentation

Wayne Higgins and Wei Shi Climate Prediction Center / NCEP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relationships Between Gulf of California Moisture Surges and Tropical Cyclones in the Eastern Pacific Basin Wayne Higgins and Wei Shi Climate Prediction Center / NCEP 29th Climate Diagnostics and Prediction Workshop Madison, WI 18-22 October, 2004

  2. Objectives • To examine relationships between Gulf of California moisture surges and tropical cyclones using standard surface observations, the Regional Reanalysis circulation and moisture fields, tropical cyclone track data, and observed precipitation. • To distinguish the precipitation and atmospheric circulation patterns for several categories of surge events, including those that are directly related, indirectly related and not related to TC’s.

  3. Data Set Selection • Hourly Surface observations at Yuma, AZ • Td, surface wind speed, and surface wind direction • Precipitation • US_Mexico daily precipitation analysis (Higgins et al. 2000) • Resolution (lon, lat)=(1.0°x1.0°) • Tropical Cyclone (HURDAT) track data (NHC) • Atmospheric Circulation and Moisture • NCEP Regional Reanalysis (Mesenger et al. 2004) • Period of Analysis: July-August 1977-2001* • * except 1992 in surface observations and 1977-78 in RR

  4. Identification of Surge Events • Application of method given in Fuller and Stensrud (2000) • Onset Characteristics: • Rapid increase in surface Td > mean* • Surface winds > mean* • Surface wind direction ~ southerly • 25-hr running means are used to avoid misleading aspects of the diurnal cycle in the desert (little impact on surge ID) . * climatological mean: July-August 1977-2001

  5. Td (˚C), Wind Direction (˚) and Wind Speed (m s-1) at Yuma, AZ July-August 1986 W S S W S S S S * Note: Fuller and Stensrud (2000) identified the same set of events.

  6. Classification of Surge Events • Surges at Yuma were further further classified based on their relationships to eastern Pacific TC’s. • TC-related: A TC crosses 110W within 3 days of a surge at Yuma, AZ. • Direct Influence: If the TC center of circulation moves within 3° of Baja California, GOC, or Mexican mainland (poleward of 22 ° N) within 3 days of onset. • Indirect Influence: If the direct influence criterion is not satisfied. • Not TC-related: No TC crosses 110W within 3 days of a surge at Yuma, AZ.

  7. TROPICAL CYCLONE TRACKS IN THE REGIONAL REANALYSIS direct indirect mean direct (RR) mean indirect (RR) mean direct (Obs.) mean indirect (Obs.) • The RR has realistic TC tracks that compare well to observations, so it is appropriate to use the circulation and moisture fields from RR to link the TC’s and surges at Yuma, AZ.

  8. Number (%) of Yuma Surges by Category

  9. Classification of Surge Events(Higgins et al. 2004) • Definestrong, weak, wet, dry surges • Strong: Td > climatological mean for at least 3 days • Weak: Td > climatological mean for less than 3 days • Wet: positive precipitation anomalies in AZNM* for the 5 day period (day 0 to day +4) after onset • Dry: negative precipitation anomalies in AZNM* for the 5 day period (day 0 to day +4) after onset * AZNM:Arizona/New Mexico (112.5°-107.5°W; 32°-36°N)

  10. 25-hr Running Mean Values of Td (˚C) at Yuma and Daily Precipitation Anomaly (mm) in AZNM* for July-August 1986 (W)eak or (S)trong W S S W S S S S Precip Td (W)et or (D)ry D W W D D W D W • Some surges are associated with wetter-than-normal conditions in AZNM while others are associated with drier-than-normal conditions . • This is somewhat independent of surge strength. *AZNM:Arizona/New Mexico (112.5°-107.5°W; 32°-36°N)

  11. Number (%) of Yuma Surges by Category • 45% of the TC-related surges are strong and wet, while only 27% of the surges • not related to TC’s are strong and wet • 50% of surges with a direct relationship to TC’s are strong and wet and 82% are strong.

  12. Composite Evolution of Precipitation Anomalies (mm) for Moisture Surges Keyed to Yuma • All surges: SENW progression of +ve anomalies along the west coast • The positive precipitation anomalies are much larger and more widespread for the TC-related surges than for surges not related to TC’s.

  13. Composite Evolution of Precipitation Anomalies (mm) for Moisture Surges Keyed to Yuma • Surges that are directly related to TC’s have much larger +ve anomalies over most of Mexico than those that are indirectly related.

  14. Fraction (%) of Total Precipitation and Accumulated Precipitation Anomalies (mm) July-August 1977-2001 base period • The fraction of surge-related precipitation during TC-related surges is larger than that during surges not related to TC’s, yet TC-related surges account for less than half of the total surge events (65 of 142 events).

  15. Fraction (%) of Total Precipitation and Accumulated Precipitation Anomalies (mm) • Most of rainfall during TC-related surges occurs when the TC’s are directly related to Yuma surges, yet these cases are relatively rare (38 events over 25 years).

  16. Mean 925-hPa Vector Wind Anomalies (m s-1) and Specific Humidity Anomalies (g kg-1) The low-level southerly flow is stronger and there is more low level moisture present in the GOC region for the TC-related surges than for surges not related to TC’s

  17. Mean 925-hPa Vector Wind Anomalies (m s-1) and Specific Humidity Anomalies (g kg-1) Differences between direct and indirect cases are pronounced with moisture transport from the southeast along the entire GOC in the direct cases

  18. Vertical Profiles of Wind Direction and Wind Speed Anomalies (tenths of knots) and Specific Humidity Anomalies (g kg-1) • Surges that are directly related to TC’s have dramatically stronger low-level southerly flow and the most significant increases in moisture along the GOC. Specific humidity anomalies are as large as 25% of the mean value at Puerto Penasco.

  19. Vertical Profiles of Wind Direction and Wind Speed Anomalies (tenths of knots) and Specific Humidity Anomalies (g kg-1) along 110oW • Surges with direct TC influences show a much stronger cyclonic signature in the wind field and larger moisture anomalies than those with indirect TC influences.

  20. 850-hPa Mean Vector Wind (m s-1) and Specific Humidity (g kg-1) (July – August 1979-2001)

  21. Summary • Relationships between gulf surges and eastern Pacific Tropical Cyclones (TCs) were examined. • Emphasis was placed on the relative differences in precipitation and atmospheric circulation patterns for several surge categories (TC-related, not TC-related, direct and indirect). • TC-related surges account for slightly less than half of all surges. • Surges that are directly related to TC’s have dramatically stronger low-level southerly flow and the most significant increases in moisture along the GOC. They occur on average about once per year, and are the most prolific rain producers.

More Related