1 / 6

N. LEM. F. 47 y. 1 m50 49 Kg

N. LEM. F. 47 y. 1 m50 49 Kg. 1986. Bilateral high dislocated hip. 1986. Right leg shortening 7.5 cm Left leg shortening 7 cm No leg length discrepancy No deformation of the lumber spine. What would you do?. Femoral shortening osteotomy? Or not?. LEM.

kfrench
Download Presentation

N. LEM. F. 47 y. 1 m50 49 Kg

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. N. LEM. F. 47 y. 1 m50 49 Kg 1986 Bilateral high dislocated hip 1986 Right leg shortening 7.5 cm Left leg shortening 7 cm No leg length discrepancy No deformation of the lumber spine What would you do? Femoral shortening osteotomy? Or not?

  2. LEM. THA with cemented components Leg length lengthening Right 6.5 cm Left 6 cm Without femoral osteotomy 1987 16 y. PO 6 6 6 120 0 30 20 30 20 2003

  3. GRE. A. F. 51 y. 1 m53 55 kg • Bilateral Crowe 4 DDH • -10 20 10 20 10 4 3 3 painful • -15 20 30 30 40 4 3 3 painful • Left valgus knee – arthritic - painful • Lumbar spine – arthritic – not completely fixed painful • Pelvic tilt • Shortening R.Hip 8,5 cm, left 9 cm • Bilateral abduction osteotomy at 5 y. but no residual angular • femoral deformation • What would you do? Which approach? • Which type of prosthesis? • Femoral shortening osteotomy? Or not?

  4. First operation on the left side. Acetabular component cemented in the true acetabulum augmented with autograft secured with 2 screws. Femoral component inserted at the lesser trochanter level. It was impossible to reduce the hip. Rather than do a shortening femoral osteotomy, I prefered inserting the femoral component 2 cm below the lesser trochanter. No problem to fix the greater trochanter. Lengthening 6.5 cm.

  5. An acetabular reinforcement device was added on the right side because the acetabular bone was soft and fragile. Same problem as on the left side with the femur. Bone section 2 cm below the lesser trochanter. No problem to fix the greater trochanter. Left hip : 18 months PO 110 0 30 20 30 20 6 6 6 Right hip : 1 year PO 110 0 30 20 30 20 6 6 6

  6. R. Hip 15 y. PO 110 0 30 30 30 20 6 6 6 L. Hip 16 y. PO 110 0 30 30 30 20 6 6 6 Equality of the lower limbs No residual pelvic tilt

More Related