70 likes | 308 Views
Responding to the Complaint. Time for Responding to service of a complaint ? 20 days, plus extensions ? FRCP Rule 12(a)Motions to Dismiss ? FRCP Rules 12(b)(c), (f)American Nurses' Assoc. v. IllinoisWhat is the standard for dismissal for failure to state a claim?Does a plaintiff have to plead ev
E N D
1. Civil Procedure Professor Marc H. Greenberg Unit II
Responding to the Complaint
2. Responding to the Complaint Time for Responding to service of a complaint – 20 days, plus extensions – FRCP Rule 12(a)
Motions to Dismiss – FRCP Rules 12(b)(c), (f)
American Nurses’ Assoc. v. Illinois
What is the standard for dismissal for failure to state a claim?
Does a plaintiff have to plead evidence
Can this decision be reconciled with MCI Worldcom?
What happens if you win a 12(b)(6) motion?
What is the effect of adding elements outside of the pleadings to a Rule 12(b)(6) motion? What is different about a Rule 56 motion?
What is a motion to strike (Rule 12(f)?
Answering the Complaint
Denials – Per Rule 8, you can admit, deny or plead insufficient information as to each allegation. General denials are disfavored.
3. Responding to the Complaint Answering the Complaint
Denials – Zielinski v. Philadelphia Piers
Defendant cannot profit from its own misleading responses to discovery – you will be estopped from a statute of limitations defense in such a case.
CCP §431.30(d) – the effect of verifying a pleading – no general denial is allowed in response.
How the “without knowledge and information” denial works, and when to use it
Negative Pregnant denials, and how to avoid them
Affirmative Defenses (FRCP Rule 8(c); Ingraham v. U.S.; Taylor v. U.S. – are these decisions reconcilable? If not, which is the better interpretation of the Rule, and why?
4. Responding to the Complaint Of Replies and Amendments to Pleadings – FRCP Rule 7(a), 15
Beeck v. Aquaslide
What is the standard of review in this case – why is this important?
Why is the absence of bad faith by defendant a factor here?
Do you agree with this result? It’s a tough case.
Moore v. Moore – post-trial amendments are problematic – is the child custody nature of this case a factor?
Worthington v. Wilson – does the relation back doctrine apply to Does, particularly after the expiration of the statute of limitations?
5. Responding to the Complaint Supplemental Pleadings – FRCP Rules 7(a), 15(d)
Used to cure defects in the original pleading, to add new claims, or to provide additional facts to update the complaint
Deterring Frivolous Pleadings – FRCP Rules 11, 23.1
Note that Rule 11 sanctions may be imposed against either or both the attorney and the client
Note the continuing obligations of good faith, and re-evaluation of the merits of your claims, required under this Rule – pre-filing investigation must be supplemented throughout a litigation
Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels – Court looks to the purpose of the FRCP, and of Rule 23(b) in reversing this decision.
Hadges v. Yonkers – note the 21day safe-harbor; and that attorneys are entitled to rely on the objectively reasonable representations of their clients.
6. Responding to the Complaint
7. Responding to the Complaint