1 / 13

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Neutrino Mass — A Point of Principle

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Neutrino Mass — A Point of Principle. e –. e –. Nucl’. Nucl. Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay [0]. This is the promising approach to testing whether neutrinos are their own antiparticles. It will be sought with greatly increased sensitivity.  i.

kiana
Download Presentation

Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Neutrino Mass — A Point of Principle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay and Neutrino Mass — A Point of Principle

  2. e– e– Nucl’ Nucl Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay[0] This is the promising approach to testing whether neutrinos are their own antiparticles. It will be sought with greatly increased sensitivity.

  3. i SM vertex e– e– i  Mixing matrix Uei Uei i W– W– Nuclear Process Nucl’ Nucl To estimate the sensitivity required — we assume that 0 is dominated by a diagram with Standard Model vertices:

  4. In SM vertex i e– e– i  Mixing matrix Uei Uei i W– W– Nuclear Process Nucl’ Nucl Mass (i) the i is emitted [RH + O{mi/E}LH]. Thus, Amp [i contribution]  mi Amp[0]   miUei2 m i — Down the Garden Path —

  5. The Trap This makes it look as if 0 needs  mass only because of a helicity mismatch. Suppose we had a parity-conserving world, that treats right-handed and left-handed particles in the same way. Couldn’t we then have 0 without any  mass? No!  mass is still required.

  6. e– e– Nucl’ Nucl ()R L X mL Why? — manifestly does not conserve L. But the Standard Model (SM) weak interactions do conserve L. Absent any non-SM L-violating interactions, the L = 2 of 0 can only come from Majorana neutrino masses, such as — mL(LcL + LLc)

  7. X mL Assuming Standard Model vertices, 0 is — e– e– ()R L W– W– Nuclear Process Nucl’ Nucl The Majorana neutrino mass term plays two roles: Violate L Flip handedness It will be needed for (1) even when not needed for (2).

  8. A Parity-Conserving Toy-Model Illustration Suppose there is only one generation. Suppose the W couples to the electron and neutrino via a parity-conserving vector current: Suppose the neutrino mass term is also L  R invariant: We take mM,D real, mM > mD, and neglect the electron mass.

  9. The neutrino mass eigenstates are the two Majorana particles — , with mass , and . , with mass In terms of them —

  10. e– e– i  i = 1,2 W– W– Consider now the particle-physics part of 0 — If the electrons both emerge Left-Handed (LH), only the LH leptonic currents contribute. For this final state, one finds that the amplitude, ALL, obeys — The amplitude is proportional to the Majorana  mass mM.

  11. Similarly, if both electrons emerge right-handed, the amplitude, ARR, obeys — If the electrons emerge with opposite handedness, both the LH and RH currents are involved, and one finds that the amplitude, ALR, obeys — The amplitude is proportional to the Majorana  mass mM.

  12. eR– eL– ()R LH current RH current W– W– L R X X mD mM Why ALR is also proportional to the Dirac mass mD: BK, Petcov, and Rosen; Enqvist, Maalampi, and Mursula The process is — Two flips of handedness are needed.

  13. Summary Absent L-nonconserving interactions from beyond the Standard Model, 0 requires Majorana neutrino mass. This mass is needed to introduce L-nonconservation, even if it is not needed for any other reason.

More Related