1 / 1

CONCLUSION

Nuclear Waste Disposal and Safety Safety Research for Nuclear Waste Disposal Long-lived Radionuclides in Final Disposal Systems. Interaction of selenite with iron sulphide minerals: FeS versus FeS 2 Breynaert E. , Dom D., Wangermez W., Scheinost A., Kirschhock C.E.A., Maes A. Introduction

kiele
Download Presentation

CONCLUSION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nuclear Waste Disposal and Safety Safety Research for Nuclear Waste Disposal Long-lived Radionuclides in Final Disposal Systems Interaction of selenite with iron sulphide minerals: FeS versus FeS2 Breynaert E., Dom D., Wangermez W., Scheinost A., Kirschhock C.E.A., Maes A. • Introduction • Selenium: essential micronutrient, toxic at higher concentrations • Longlived 79Se radioisotope (t½ = 295 ky) present in high-level RadWaste • Se release from mining waste (e.g. Western Phosphate Resource Area) • Se mobility decreases in reducing conditions (low soluble Se0 and FeSex minerals) [ GAO-12-505 Phosphate Mining on Federal Land - http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-12-505 ] Se(IV) interaction with pyrite (FeS2) and mackinawite, troilite (FeS) • EXAFS • XAS wavelet analysis • Se(IV) + FeS2 (pyrite) ⇨ Se0↓ • Se(IV) + FeS (mackinawite)⇨ FeSe↓ • Se(IV) + FeS (troilite) ⇨ FeSex↓ Se Fe Bruggemanet al. (2005). Env. Poll. 137: 209 – 221 Breynaert et al. (2008). ES&T, 42(10), 3595-3601 Scheinost, et al. (2008) J. Contam. Hydrol., 102(3-4), 228-45 Breynaert et al. (2010). ES&T 47: 6649 - 6655 Why do FeS2 and FeS react geochemically different ? FeS2 FeS • Surface S2-2 oxidised to S2O32- • Se(IV) + FeS2 (pyrite) ⇨ selenopolythionate • 4 S2O32- + H2SeO3 + 4 H+⇨ S4O62- + Se(S2O3)22- + 3 H2O • Se(S2O3)22-⇨ Se0 • In presence of excess sulphur donors (e.g.) S2O32-, SO32- • Se(IV) homogeneously reduced S-2 • Se(IV) ⇨ Se0(am) • Se0(am) reductive dissolution • Se0(am) ⇨ HSe-, Se2-,Se22- • Se(s) + H+ + 2e− = HSe− • log K0 = -7.5 (Eh = -200 mV) • Fe2+ from FeS solubility • Fe2+ + Se2- = FeSe • Fe2+ + 2Se-= FeSe2 Druschel & Borda (2006). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 70(20), 5246-5250. REFERENCES SAMPLES 77Se NMR Se(S2O3)22- SeO32- • Wavelets assist to map maximum amplitudes on k-space to peaks in r-space • thiosulphate pathway • Se(IV) + FeS2 • ⇩ Se(S2O3)22- + Se0↓ • polysulphide pathway • Se(IV) + FeS ⇩ FeSex ↓ CONCLUSION What is the impact of seleno- polythionate on Se mobility in pyrite-containing anoxic sediments? [ ppm ] Dr. Eric Breynaert | KULeuven | Center for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis | eric.breynaert@biw.kuleuven.be | www.biw.kuleuven.be/m2s/cok/ This work is performed in cooperation with, and with the financial support of ONDRAF/NIRAS, the Belgian Agency for Radioactive Waste and Fissile Materials, as part of the programme on geological disposal of high-level/long-lived radioactive waste that is carried out by ONDRAF/NIRAS

More Related