1 / 18

CEI:

CEI:. Sound Resource Management Olympia, Washington 360-867-1033 Jeff.Morris@zerowaste.com Environmental Summit – May 20, 2008. A C onsumer E nvironmental I ndex for Washington State. Acknowledgements. Sound Resource Management Economist Team:

kieran-travis
Download Presentation

CEI:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CEI: Sound Resource Management Olympia, Washington 360-867-1033 Jeff.Morris@zerowaste.com Environmental Summit – May 20, 2008 A Consumer Environmental Index for Washington State

  2. Acknowledgements Sound Resource Management Economist Team: Dr. Jeffrey Morris, SRMG - Team Manager Dr. H. Scott Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University Dr. Frank Ackerman, Tufts University Washington State Department of Ecology, CEI Project Steering Committee: Dennis Bowhay Chris Chapman Cristiana Figueroa-Kaminsky Ivor Melmore - Project Manager Gretchen Newman Cheryl Smith Ken Zarker

  3. The Problem Life Cycle Analysis The CEI Solution CEI graphs Consumer Pollution Intensity in 2005 A Few CEI Details CEI limitations and Data Gaps CEI Robustness Presentation Outline

  4. Economics – The Good, The Bad & The Ugly • Efficiency & Equilibrium – the magic of competitive markets (Adam Smith’s invisible hand creates optimality). • Externalities – pollution from free disposal (If it doesn’t have a price or cost the market ignores it). • Equity – dollar votes drive markets (Those without dollars don’t get to vote; those with more dollars get more votes).

  5. The CEI Solution • An index like the CPI - except covers all consumer purchases, not just unchanging basket, and measures changes over time in environmental impacts, rather than prices. • Tracks the environmental impact of consumer choices on (1) climate change, (2) public health, and (3) ecosystems health. • Should decline when there are decreases in toxic substances, wastes and/or pollution associated with production, use, and disposal of the goods and services consumers demand.

  6. 1. US BLS 700 category CES 2. US BEA 491 sector EIO 3. US EPA TRI, AIRData & GHG Emissions 4. US DOE Transportation Energy Data Book 5. Carnegie Mellon EIO-LCA model 6. WA Dept of Ecology air emissions data 7. Process LCAs for paint, used oil, & pesticides 8. US EPA WARM & MSW DST models Data Sources

  7. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) Wastes & Pollution

  8. 1. Global warming (eCO2) 2. Human health – particulates, SOx and NOx (ePM2.5) 3. Human health – toxins (eToluene) 4. Human health – carcinogens (eBenzene) 5. Ecosystem toxicity (e2,4-D) 6. Others – acidification, eutrophication, ozone depletion, smog formation, resource/fossil fuel depletion, land use, water use, biodiversity, habitat alteration, indoor air quality LCA Environmental Impacts

  9. 2005Pollution Intensity WA Consumer Spending

  10. Implementation of US Department of Commerce published IO tables Current benchmark: 1997 (2002 soon) Long-term project: 10 years in making Free, online at www.eiolca.net Widely used for LCA research in the US More than 100 peer-reviewed papers on development and application More than 1 million uses of the model EIO – LCA Model

  11. TRI limitations - e.g., agriculture Impacts not covered – e.g., habitat and ecosystem services degradations Use phase coverage not complete – e.g., household cleaning/laundering products and pharmaceuticals New home construction not included Differential impacts of domestic vs. foreign production Important Issues for Project Team & Peer Reviewers

  12. Weber and Matthews study – US produced 22% of eCO2 in 2005, but US consumption accounted for 25-26%, about 15% more than production. This could mean that CEI model climate change upstream impacts should be 15% higher. If 15% higher in all years 2000-2005, then CEI climate change component only up from 118.1 to 118.4, and overall CEI up from 126.2 to 126.4. Imports as Example of CEI Robustness

More Related