1 / 17

EOI Evaluation

EOI Evaluation. Recommendations for decision-making. Facts about EOIs received. IfE received 150 EOIs in total Total value: 58,494,864 GBP Funds to be allocated: a little over 8 MGBP We considered all EOIs received until the early morning of the 20 th

kieve
Download Presentation

EOI Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EOI Evaluation Recommendations for decision-making

  2. Facts about EOIs received • IfE received 150 EOIs in total • Total value: 58,494,864 GBP • Funds to be allocated: a little over 8 MGBP • We considered all EOIs received until the early morning of the 20th • Diversity in terms of origin, size and types of organisations

  3. Spread across the themes

  4. Spread across the themes • Major theme combinations: • 1 & 4 (4) • 4 & 5 (6) • 4 & 6 (17) • 4 & 5 & 6 (4)

  5. Spread in terms of project size

  6. Application Guidelines • Must use the prescribed format • Must be non state organisation • Must have financial capacity (audit reports) • Must relate to themes of Innovation for Education • Accountability & Empowerment • Inclusive Education • Climate Change & environment • Effective teaching & learning • Skills development • Use of appropriate technologies in education

  7. Within budget range? Yes Org. or consortium NGO/FBO/PS? Yes Yes EOI form used? No below budget Organisation ? Lead yes, member no (state) EOI disqualified If selected for proposal request to make state member beneficiary No above budget No No (individual) No If selected for proposal request to reduce budget EOI disqualified EOI disqualified EOI disqualified Yes Yes No Audit reports? Double turnover 3 years? If selected for proposal request to provide audit reports with proposal No only 2 years Yes No only ≤ 1 year Proposal relates to themes? EOI disqualified No EOI disqualified Yes Score all sections in the EOI

  8. EOI Evaluation Process • Every EOI looked at by 2 different people: one grants management person and one education person • Every project evaluated has a separate completed score sheet • Using a scale from 1 to 5 • Remarks from each evaluator included in the score sheet • Scoring of each item based on agreement between 2 evaluators • Final list established through meeting by entire evaluation team

  9. The Evaluations • At EOI stage special attention to (i) financial and operational management capacity and (ii) innovation (see EOI form) • We use an initial threshold of 70 out of 100 points • Everything <70: too little quality in terms of the combination innovativeness – organisational capacity • Everything > 80: convinced about good quality both in terms of innovativeness as well as in terms of organisational capacity • Between 70 and 80: more difficult to draw strong conclusions

  10. The Evaluations • Financial management criteria - If softened criteria not met: OUT. (Total: 62) • But we did look at these 62 applications without scoring them. This led to some good ideas that could receive an exception. To be discussed separately. • Overall: the applications not meeting the finance criteria were not good

  11. Outcome of the scoring • Number of projects reaching the > 70 points threshold: 51 projects • Total value represented by the > 70 points threshold: 23,022,355 GBP

  12. Spread of themes among > 70 points projects • Accountability & Empowerment: 10 • Inclusive Education: 11 • Climate Change & Environment: 1 • Effective Teaching & Learning: 30 • Skills Development: 15 • Appropriate Technologies: 18

  13. Budgetary Spread among > 70 points projects

  14. High proportion of high value projects in highest scoring projects • If we take only the projects of 80 and above, we will arrive at an amount of 12,392,448 GBP and 22 projects (i.e. perfect in terms of value, low in terms of number of projects, all themes represented) • If we take all projects of 75 points and above: 18,185,102 GBP and 37 projects (i.e. perfect in terms of number of projects, high in terms of total value)

  15. Decision-making • Not consider projects that scored below 70 • Include all projects that scored 80 or more • Not have a total value of projects with that is more than double the amount available for funding, i.e. 16 MGBP • Suggestion: Choose additional projects for a total value of 3.5 MGBP of the projects that scored between 70 and 80 as well as “special projects to consider” (see next slide), using criteria of (i) innovation and (ii) diversity (themes, type of organisation, country of origin, size of project) • Alternative: Take all projects of 76 points and above

  16. Special projects to discuss • 7. ISHYO • 32. ISARO • 38. SURF 1 • 47. Arama • 49. SURF 2 • 66. ARCOS • 55. Transparency Rwanda • 143. Rwanda Film Institute

  17. Contact Details Address: 3rd Floor, Office 311, MINEDUC Building, Kacyiru – Kigali Email: innovation.rwanda@gmail.com Web: www.mineduc.org/innovationforeducation Tel: +250 786340061

More Related