1 / 33

Social Psychology Lecture 2

Social Psychology Lecture 2. Models of social interaction and their application to social skills training Jane Clarbour (Spring 2002). Objectives. Demonstrate an understanding of the concept of social skill Identify differences between social behaviour and motor skills

kim
Download Presentation

Social Psychology Lecture 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social PsychologyLecture 2 Models of social interaction and their application to social skills training Jane Clarbour (Spring 2002)

  2. Objectives • Demonstrate an understanding of the concept of social skill • Identify differences between social behaviour and motor skills • Give an account of the revision to the social skills model • Describe the application of the social skills model in relation to social skills training and social deficits • Specify the basic principles of social skills training • Specify the principles of assertivenesstraining

  3. Social skills model Argyle & Kendon, 1967 • Social interaction as a skill – • like driving a car or a game of tennis • Much is known about motor skills processes • this knowledge is transferable to social interaction

  4. Applications of the social skills model • A person’s behaviour affects other people’s • Physical proximity • Posture • Language & speech • Patterns of looking at other people • Bodily movements • Facial expression

  5. Skills in social interaction • Knowledge that actions are related to consequences • Watch for signs of emotional disturbance • This might signal signs of argument • Watch for signs of appropriate action • Time to talk, or time to listen • Apply appropriate tone of voice/choice of words • Make appropriate gestures

  6. Motor Skills Motor skill operator has main goals and sub-goals Driving: Main goal getting somewhere Sub-goal Steering Changing gear etc… Social Skills Social skills model also uses main goals and sub-goals Interviewing: Main goal Gathering information Sub-goal Establishing rapport in order to obtain that goal Similarities between social interaction & motor skillsDistinctive goals

  7. Similarities between social interaction & motor skillsIdentification of relevant cues • Motorists: • concentration on movement of traffic & edge of road (not admiring view!) • Social interaction: • selective attention of cues relevant to intended goal, such as making friends • Identification of irrelevant cues • Psychiatric disorders: • Some people particularly bad at selecting social information. • Depressives selectively attend to negative feedback about themselves making depression worse (Trower, 1981).

  8. Similarities between social interaction & motor skillsCentral translation processes (‘planning’) Translation of Perceptual Processes Motor skill: Translation of information relating to car and the kerb into appropriate steering response. Social skill: People learn certain behavioural strategies in response to social situations. Forward planning – prospective cognition

  9. Similarities between social interaction & motor skillsMotor responses This refers to the actual behaviour. Motor skill: Initially very awkward (like driving a car – each action requires much practice, but then becomes automated) Social skill: Initially difficult or awkward – but like driving, with practice becomes more automated. natural behaviour Artificial behaviour

  10. Similarities between social interaction & motor skillsFeedback & corrective action Motor skill: Skilled performer uses perceptual cues to take corrective action (e.g. steering a car. Social Skill: Skilled performer corrects performance in relation to social feedback from others. (Note importance of non-verbal feedback). Both rely on timing of respective contribution

  11. Application of motor performance to social skills model (cited in Hargie, 1997) • Motivation • Sitting in a rather warm room • Goal • Desire to cool down • Translation • Devise plans of action (i.e. open window/take off coat/turn down heating) • Response • Carry out chosen plan • Perception • Monitor change

  12. Argyle’s social skills model (Argyle & Kendon, 1967) Feedback loop Perception Changes in outside world Motivation, goal Translation Motor responses

  13. Perceptual processes • Perceptual processes are selective. • Skilled performers know what they can ignore. • Perceptual cues vary according to each situation • Varies according to cooperative or competitive interaction • Skilled performance is related to accurate perception of relevant features of specific situation

  14. Translation processes • Skilled translation • entails adequate interpretation of perceived cues as requiring specific action • May become automated as relevant social ‘schemata’, or translations. • Skilled performers require vast repertoire of translations

  15. Actions/motor responses • Hierarchical basis of behaviour • General level (plan) • Contains many sub-plans of behavioural • Sub-plans (activities) • Different ways might obtain same outcome • Fine details • Body posture, proximity, utterances, Social skills may be analysed at any level

  16. Application of SSM to social context • Person A meets person B • A is attracted to B (motivation) • A wants to know B’s name (immediate goal) • Person A translates social context • A devises plans of action & considers consequences of various alternative plans • Give own name and pause… • Ask directly • A carries out plan • A gets response from B • Person A perceives B’s response • Person A translates social context….etc.

  17. Weakness of the SSM • Emphasis on the individual within the interaction • Ignores feedback from external sources • Cognitive bias • ignores role of emotion

  18. Revisions to social skills model(Hargie & Marshall, 1986) • New model accounts for goals of both interactors • Feedback from self & other • Replace ‘central translation processes’ with Inclusion of emotion and retrospective cognition relating to action Interpretation of the model within person-situation context

  19. Summary of social skills model • Social interaction likened to motor skill acquisition through the social skills model (SSM). • SSM sees interaction as • skilled performance • A matching process • Behaviour is directed and adaptive, • Social inputs are translated (non-verbal behaviour, proximity, language etc) and matched with actions related to consequences • Revised social skills model includes emotion and cognition instead of central translation processes – interpreting the model within the person-situation context.

  20. Social Skills Training • Research into the SSM has highlighted fine details of social interaction – making it easier for people to learntochange their own behaviour • Interventions and training can even change how people think • But Social Skills Training and Assertiveness Training are designed to changehow people communicate

  21. Social competence • Establishing and maintaining friendly relationships • Being cooperative and helpful • Clear communication • Persuasive • Perceptual sensitivity • Warmth • Flexibility

  22. Social Skills Training • Social skills training is based on the assumption that communication is a form of skill that can be learned and improved like any other • Based on principles of: • Demonstration • Practice • Feedback

  23. Procedures in social skills training Social skills training is based on the SSM of demonstration, practice and feedback. • Demonstration A tennis coach when instructing a pupil to serve might demonstrate what to do herself first • Practice She might then get the pupil to practice a few times • Feedback She would probably then give feedback on the pupil’s performance – verbal, or video feedback

  24. Explicit vs. Implicit feedback • Implicitfeedback(‘I think you could do a little better’) • Ineffective because unclear to which behaviour referring. • Explicitfeedback(‘you need to maintain more eye contact’) • Effective as the client is explicitly told of good or bad performance, and why the performance has improved Emphasis on feedback should be explicit!

  25. Effective feedback • Effective feedback may be • Verbal • A tape recoding • A videotape recording • Most effective feedback is • Immediate • Not enjoyed! • Acceptable • Essential for learning

  26. Assertiveness Training • Aims to: • Effectively communicate own position • provide feedback to other person about how they should behave in future • Be firm, clear, and convincing • Assertiveness is not aggression! • Aggression involves and may invoke hostility(not the purpose of assertiveness

  27. Assertiveness Training is… • Direct – stating explicitly what the problem is. • Specific – an assertion should be clear & focused (avoid generalisation). • Respectful – avoid blame, attack and not demeaning. (RAKOS, 1990)

  28. Refusal Assertion (Kelly, 1982) • Poor refusal assertion may lead to: • feelings of helplessness • loss of control • low self-esteem • Depression • Skilled refusal assertion may lead to: • Changes in the behaviour of others • Increased perception of self-efficacy • Higher self-esteem

  29. Application of Refusal Assertion • Socially passive/unassertive individuals • Highly aggressive/violent individuals (lack of skills necessary for anger and aggression control)

  30. Refusal Assertion Training Minimal Effect Response(Rimm & Masters, 1987) • Use least amount of effort to obtain objective • e.g. apologise (as violation of an individual’s rights may be unintended/accidental • Excessive assertion may be counter-productive (producing hostility rather than compliance) • Be persistent • Sometimes the minimal response may be insufficient. • Incremental increase in degree of assertion.

  31. Social skills deficits (Franzoi, 2000) • Social anxiety • An emotion experienced due to concern with interpersonal evaluation (Leary & Kowalski, 1995) • Self-oriented concern • Fear of negative reaction from others invokes self-fulfilling prophecy(Pozo et al, 1991) • Avoidance of eye contact • Appearing nervous or jittery • Loneliness (Jones et al, 1982) • Lonely people spend more time talking about themselves • Show less interest in others • Expectation of failure in social interaction

  32. Poor social skills and mental disorder • Poor social skills may lead to mental disorder (Argyle & Kendon, 1967) • Social failure may lead to social rejection and failure to cope • Poor coping skills and rejection may lead to anxiety disorders

  33. Conclusions • Emphasis on learned behaviour • Links between social skills training and the social skills model • Considered social skills training for: • Interview techniques • Assertiveness training • Refusal assertion • Shown to be effective and long lasting • May be beneficial in raising self-esteem

More Related