1 / 27

A Modified Open Method for Sutureless Tracheostomy Personal Experience from 2008 to 2012

Learn about a modified approach for tracheostomy, its benefits, and comparison to conventional and percutaneous methods. Includes a detailed study, techniques, and outcomes from a surgical expert.

kimberlysnyder
Download Presentation

A Modified Open Method for Sutureless Tracheostomy Personal Experience from 2008 to 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Modified Open Method for Sutureless TracheostomyPersonal Experience from 2008 to 2012 Chih-Hao Chen, MD Department of Thoracic Surgery Mackay Memorial Hospital 馬 偕 紀 念 醫 院 胸 腔 外 科 陳 治 豪 醫師

  2. Brief Introduction • Tracheostomy is a common procedure and has a long history. • Conventional tracheostomy is a open methods for delicate dissection. • More delicate but time-consuming • More secure in control airway and ventilation • Recently, percutaneous puncture method become popular. ( similar to placement of a CVC ) • Quick due to dissect and place bluntly. • Bronchoscopic guide is useful but required more complicated • More likely to bleed • Require specialized tools

  3. Complication of long-term placement of an oro-endotracheal tube: an example

  4. Brief Introduction • At the time we attempted for such modified approach, percutaneous puncture methods is not a routine procedure in our institution. • Therefore the choice is limited. • And the economic burden existed ( not covered by insurance system ) • Not affordable for most conditions

  5. A proposed modification • When we gained more and more experiences, we started to think if tiny wound is technically feasible by open method(s). • Theoretically, the smallest wound size is the size that allowed for secure passage of the tracheostomy tube. • Then, we began to try small incision and then utimately mini-wound for sutureless tracheostomy.

  6. Materials and Methods • Study period : • 2008.07.01 ~ 2012.09.19 • Inclusion Criteria : • All case consulted for tracheostomy in our team • Exclusion Criteria : • Bedside emergency tracheostomy ( no clear records ) • Complex tracheal surgery • Traumatic tracheal injury • Operator : • Chih-Hao Chen • Single surgeon to avoid selection bias • Preference and experience • 259 patients ( not randomized ) • 156 case : conventional open tracheostomy • 103 case : modified sutureless tracheostomy

  7. Materials and Methods • Steps of open method : • 1. positioning, preparing and disinfecting the operative field • 2. LA  a 1-3 cm wound was made horizontally (or vertically) • 3. open dissection of the pretracheal soft tissues by both electrical cautery and mini-retractors. • 4. In case of enlarged thyroid isthmus  separation/division • 4. confrim FiO2 below 40%. • 5. an inverted-U treacheal flap was created retracted ETT outwards • 6. A tracheostomy tube was placed into the trachea • 7. fascia /muscle/ skin were closed in layers.

  8. An Example of Open Tracheostomy

  9. Materials and Methods • Steps of such modified method : • Similar to that of conventional open method. • 1. positioning, preparing and disinfecting the operative field • 2. LA  a 4-5 mm wound was made vertically • 3. open dissection of the pretracheal soft tissues by both electrical cautery and mini-retractors. • 4. In case of enlarged thyroid isthmus, we retracted it upward. • 4. To confrim FiO2 below 40%. • 5. an inverted-U treacheal flap was created retracted ETT outwards • 6. a suction tube was placed to distal part of the trachea ( functioning as a guide-wire ) • 7. the tracheostomy tube was guided into the trachea

  10. An example of such technique(1) • A patient with short neck and thick pre-tracheal soft tissues. • The trachea could not be identified by physical examination.

  11. An example of such technique(2) • Anterior view of the operative field

  12. An example of such technique(3)tiny skin incision – 4 mmopen dissection with retractor

  13. An example of such technique(3) • Immediate postoperative view • The wound size is just fit with the size of tracheostomy tube. ( NO. 7 )

  14. An example of such technique(4) • Immediate postoperative view • Although dissection was a bit difficult, such techniques still works. Suture was not required.

  15. An example of such technique • Video presentation of a typical case

  16. Brief results

  17. Discussion • 1. Learning curve and technical refinement from the experience • 2. Comparison of open method, modified open and percutaneous puncture method. • 3. The significance of such modified open method.

  18. Learning Curvetime v.s. caseFrom 30 minutes to 2.5 minutes

  19. Comparison of 3 most popular procedures in tracheostomy

  20. Previous literature showed… • perioperative complications • more common with the percutaneous technique (10% vs. 3%) • post-operative complications • Minor bleeding and wound infection • more common with the surgical technique • (10% vs. 7%), • serious complications • including death and serious cardiovascular events • higher in the percutaneous group • 0.33% vs. 0.06% • procedure-related complications • more frequently in the percutaneous group • Bleeding, T-E fistula, malposition or unexpected angulation.

  21. Discussion • Thyroid isthmus : a problem for cutaneous puncture

  22. The Significance • Such modified open method preserves the merits of delicate dissection in open method and attained sutureless benefits at the same time. • The cost is even lower than that of conventional open method. • No suture required ( skin and soft tissues ) • Quick turn-over rate in the operative room • Less burden for wound care • Not required to remove suture stiches when we renew the tube • Less likelihood of wound bleeding when compared to puncture method.

  23. Discussion • Personal viewpoints : • Some meta-analysis showed comparable perioperative results in both groups. • Unavoidable bias : Surgery vs procedure ? Who perform the surgery / procedure ? surgeon vs physician vs anesthesiologist … Is bedside procedure better ? Or just acceptable ? Is non-anes. condition better / safer ? Or just acceptable ? Actually surgeons rarely report “bad results”. • Actual cost ? • (hidden costs covered by insurance) • Which one is more Cost-effective ?

  24. Conclusion • The proposed modified open method may be a reasonable and plausible alternative appraoch in performing tracheostomy. • Long-term benefits may be followed for a longer period in the future.

  25. References • Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, Griesen D, Hobgood T, Allen JN, Schuller DE. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: a prospective randomised trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheotomy. Laryngoscope 2001;111:494–500. • Heikkinen M, Aarnio P, Hannukainen J. Percutaneous dilational tra- cheostomy or conventional surgical tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 2000;28:1399–1402. • Freeman BD, Isabella K, Lin N, Buchman TG. A meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing percutaneous and surgical tracheostomy in critically ill patients. Chest 2000 Nov;118(5):1412-8. • Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger TV, Chevrolet JC. Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1617–1625. • Gysin C, Dulguerov P, Guyot JP, Perneger TV, Abajo B, Chevrolet JC. Percutaneous vs. surgical tracheostomy: a double-blind randomized trial. Ann Surg 1999;230:708–714. • Porter JM, Ivatury RR. Preferred route of tracheostomy – percutaneous vs. open at the bedside: a randomised, prospective study in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg 1999;65:142–146. • Holdgaard HO, Pedersen J, Jensen RH, Outzen KE, Midtgaard T, Johansen LV, Moller J, Paaske PB. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy vs. conventional surgical tracheostomy. A clinical randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:545–550. • Reilly PM, Sing RF, Giberson FA, Anderson HL 3rd, Rotondo MF, Tinkoff GH, Schwab CW. Hypercarbia during tracheostomy: a comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, percutaneous Doppler, and standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:859–864. • Graham JS, Mulloy RH, Sutherland FR, Rose S. Percutaneous vs. open tracheostomy: a retrospective cohort outcome study. J Trauma 1996;41:245–248. discussion 248–250. • Friedman Y, Fildes J, Mizock B, Samuel J, Patel S, Appavu S, Roberts R. Comparison of percutaneous and surgical tracheostomies. Chest 1996;110:480–485. • Crofts SL, Alzeer A, McGuire GP, Wong DT, Charles D. A comparison of percutaneous and operative tracheostomies in intensive care patients. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:775–779. • Hazard P, Jones C, Benitone J. Comparative clinical trial of standard operative tracheostomy with percutaneous tracheostomy. Crit Care Med 1991;19:1018–1024. • Griggs WM, Myburgh JA, Worthley LI. A prospective comparison of a percutaneous tracheostomy technique with standard surgical tracheostomy. Intensive Care Med 1991;17:261–263.

  26. The following is for young surgeons • We do have enough resources of research. • Clinical research • Basic science • We encourage innovations ! • We welcome new ideas !

More Related