10 likes | 146 Views
FRPA Resource Evaluation Program - High-level process (February 2, 2006). Service. Complementary. Plan. programs and. evaluations. Partnership. (MOE, FPB,. process. ILMB). Minister’s. Communications. Quality. No. Decision. (Annual &. Assurance. PAC review. Project.
E N D
FRPA Resource Evaluation Program - High-level process (February 2, 2006) Service Complementary Plan programs and evaluations Partnership (MOE, FPB, process ILMB) Minister’s Communications Quality No Decision (Annual & Assurance PAC review Project Policy Secretariat and input reports) to priorities Yes No FREWG No • Prioritize evaluation questions FREWG, RSMT and Implement Projects Joint Management JMC and Chief Forester approve recommen-dations • Plan and propose priorities and budgets RVTs • Data collection Committee JMC Yes FRPA Act, regulations standards practices and policy • Provide quality assurance framework and PAC Review and make • Analysis • Review and approve Resource FRPA approve protocols Support recommendations • Interpretation priorities recommendations? • Guidance to Resource Value Teams (Policy and regulation • Recommendations • Budget assessment Value Yes • Develop program protocols options with with Branches and Objectives • Approve evaluation and monitoring recommendations) Regions indicators and methodologies District-level • Data management system No District Data & interpretationand red flags • Program/project management Continuous improvements of forest practices and FSP content approvals Yes • Develop and deliver training and Start extension Approved monitoring indicators and protocols Policy &/orlegislation decisions Report on IPMs Communication FREWG Accept RVT RVTs Non-policy, non-legislation decisions recommendations? • Pose evaluation questions, priorities and Input into continuous improvement of monitoring procedures PolicySecretariat • Identify provincial regional & district monitoring priorities • Set of internal performance measures (IPMS) budgets No • Develop evaluation and monitoring Resource Stewardship Monitoring (RSM) indicators and methodologies • Project and budget proposals • Extension • Local Improvements • Guidance Assist in data interpretation & perform additional district analysis as required • Design and analysis of data Legislation &/orpolicy development • Implement Quality Assurance Collect field data on blocks from annually generated random list • Support to evaluation and monitoring teams Submit data to branches for entry, analysis and interpretation Results Regional Stewardship Monitoring Teams (RSMT) and Regional BA2 Teams Regional monitoring priorities • Implement quality assurance • Regional data analysis and interpretation • District data & interpretation • Plan and propose regional/provincial budgets and activities Data made available to stakeholders Regional direction Implement Continuous Improvement Loop Acronyms FPB - Forest Practices BoardFRPA - Forest and Range Practices ActFREWG - FPRA Resource Evaluation Working GroupFSP - Forest Stewardship PlanILMB - Integrated Land Management Bureau (Ministry of Agriculture and Lands)MOE - Ministry of EnvironmentPAC - Minister’s Practices Advisory CouncilRVTs - Resource Value Teams Legend Square - Individual process (detailed process at the next level of map Yellow Circle - Outside processes that will require a process, standards, guidelines, etc. Oval - Specific process starting point Solid line - Direct connection between functions Diamond – Decision Step