80 likes | 222 Views
Monitoring of Developing Country Policies and Actions for Achieving the MDGs and Related Outcomes. Zia Qureshi Global Monitoring Secretariat, World Bank Inter-Agency Workshop on Global Monitoring Washington, DC, June 19, 2003. Approach and Framework.
E N D
Monitoring of Developing Country Policies and Actions for Achieving the MDGs and Related Outcomes Zia Qureshi Global Monitoring Secretariat, World Bank Inter-Agency Workshop on Global Monitoring Washington, DC, June 19, 2003
Approach and Framework Monitoring framework anchored in Monterrey Consensus. Achieving the MDGs and related outcomes will require: • Policies supportive of stronger growth. • Enhancement of poor people’s capabilities to participate in growth, through improved delivery of key services to them—education, health, water and sanitation. • A global partnership in which stronger reform efforts of developing countries are matched with enhanced support from developed countries. Central role of the PRSP as basis for country level action and partnership.
Dimensions of Developing Country Policies to Achieve the Development Goals Economic and Financial Policies: • Private sector regulatory & institutional environment • Infrastructure: physical & financial • Macro • Trade • Social Sector Policies • Building human resources: education & health • Social protection • Voice/inclusion • Gender Public SectorManagement/ Governance • Public expenditure & revenue management • Public administration • Transparency, accountability, control of corruption Environment • Policies & Institutions
Policy Priorities Good progress on macro and trade policies, but not full pass through to growth: Three priority areas for action: • Private investment climate needs improvement, especially through strengthening the rule of law and infrastructure. • Biggest challenge for many countries is public sector governance—capacity-building and control of corruption. • More and better spending needed on human development and related services. More effective service delivery to the poor requires better governance, multisectoral approaches, and public-private partnerships.
Priorities for Monitoring Work • Despite substantial country analytical work (World Bank ESW, IMF Article IV reviews, PRSP JSAs, work of other agencies), lack of common yardstick for assessing policies across countries. Hence the quest for common metrics (e.g., WB CPIA, similar ratings by AfDB and other RDBs, the US MCA indicators). A key priority is to build on this work, in terms of robustness and comparability of the policy assessments. • Better policy metrics need to be supported by better primary data. Improved availability and quality of social sector data and indicators especially a priority.
Implementation of the Monitoring Framework: Country Policy Assessments Key issues/tasks include: • CPIA upgrading (methodology, transparency of application, disclosure) and use in global monitoring (GM) of similar policy ratings by other agencies. • Increased GM/PRSP interface (use in GM of summary assessments of PRSPs and progress on their implementation; PRSPs as basis for assessing country development resource needs and availabilities). • Use of self-evaluations by countries (findings from NEPAD peer review system).
Implementation of the Monitoring Framework:Metrics and Data in Key Specific Policy Areas Major areas of work and related initiatives are: • Metrics for key dimensions of private investment climate – Doing Business project, Investment Climate Assessments, use of FSAPs/ROSCs, Infrastructure Indicators initiative, IF country studies (trade and behind-the border issues). • More robust metrics for public sector governance – further development of public expenditure management/tracking indicators, second-generation/objective indicators of governance, governance operations progress indicators. • Better data on human resource development – inter-agency action plan to improve social sector data (subject of June 4-5 conference organized by World Bank in partnership with Eurostat, UNDP, and PARIS21).
Implementation of the Monitoring Framework:Research Further research is needed to deepen the analytical underpinnings of the monitoring framework by clarifying the links between policies and outcomes. Key areas of ongoing research are: • Constraints to and impact of growth, and the role of key drivers such as investment climate and governance. • Effectiveness of delivery of human resource development and related key services to poor people. • Multisectoral determinants of the MDGs and their relative weights and elasticities with respect to the development goals.