1 / 1

Moral relevance of history

Moral relevance of history Does history of US conquest & atrocities against civilians mean US people have no right to be upset/angry/vengeful about 9/11 attack on WTC? When should victims “get over” a crime”

king
Download Presentation

Moral relevance of history

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Moral relevance of history • Does history of US conquest & atrocities against civilians mean US people have no right to be upset/angry/vengeful about 9/11 attack on WTC? • When should victims “get over” a crime” • How to respond to horrors of history. E.g. difference between German response to Nazi’s & death camps vs. US or Japanese response to history of war crimes • Debts we cannot pay • “looking forward” vs. pretending the past has no relevance • Scientific language to persuade: euphemisms (“collateral damage”, citations of research, trying to persuade others you are credible) • Disease: yes Europeans died too. Also Africans. Epidemic diseases. Jared Diamond: Guns, Germs, Steel + subsequent critiques etc. • The problem of condescension in trying to understand others. You never get it all right. But still seems to be worth trying. • Identities. (in the paper scheme, a subset of values.) People’s sense of who they are, allegiances. I’m this kind of person.

More Related