90 likes | 194 Views
Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004. LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003. Goals & Objectives. Create a safety conscious culture throughout the MTA and its customers and business partners Improve transit systems
E N D
Governance Council Meeting Fiscal Year 2004 LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY GATEWAY CITIES SERVICE SECTOR December 18, 2003
Goals & Objectives • Create a safety conscious culture throughout the MTA and its customers and business partners • Improve transit systems • Attract, develop and retain employees • Create a positive image of the MTA • Deliver quality capital projects on time and within budget • Provide leadership for the region’s mobility agenda through responsive planning and resource allocation • Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the agency
Service Sector Goals and Objectives Goals • Managers and supervisors have been charged with the following tasks: • Managing their departments towards more efficient allocation and utilization of resources • Increasing communications with stakeholders and the community • Enhancing quality of service • Improving customer satisfaction
FY04 Budget AssumptionsOperating Assumptions • Begin revenue operation of the 22-mile Gold Line light rail system from downtown Union Station to Sierra Madre Villa in Pasadena on July1, 2003. • Increase Metro Bus service on the highest ridership lines through optimizing the system wide bus schedules and reducing service on low productivity lines. • Implement three new Rapid Bus lines: Vernon/La Cienega, Soto, and Crenshaw/Rossmore. • Implement a fare restructuring program in January 2004 to provide an estimated $16.6 million in additional revenues in FY04. • Improve the bus and rail vehicle preventive maintenance programs through scheduled mid-life overhaul programs. • Improve safety of passengers and pedestrians by continuing the S-1 Gards retrofitting project.
FY04 Budget AssumptionsCapital Assumptions • Capital projects were funded in agency-wide priority order using criteria developed by Executive Management: safety, customer improvements, previously committed, and mandated. • Approved capital projects receive an annual appropriation, capital projects are controlled by the life-of-project budget that is approved by the Board. • Revenues in the capital program are a combination of grant and local matching funds. • Final design and engineering and beginning construction of the 14-mile San Fernando Valley Metro Rapidway and accompanying bikeway is the major transit construction related project in FY04 budget.
SECTORIZATION . . .Budget Direction and Autonomy ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED: • Determining manpower allocations • Fleet composition and management • Restructuring of bus service • Direct charging of allocated costs from centralized functions • Systems for passenger counting • To validate subsidy for passenger to determine any formulas for funding • Consent decree service and costs
Fiscal Year Risks • Risks • Fluctuation of fuel prices • Workers’ Compensation reduction of $6 million • Impact of labor negotiations • FY04 budgeted average labor rates in budget and overtime burn rates assumptions • Farebox assumptions and fare media mix