1 / 6

Michigan Crash Records History Five Decades – Good & Bad

Michigan Crash Records History Five Decades – Good & Bad. 1960s CRASH System . 1966 First Surface Transportation Safety Act Required Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) 1966 First Statewide Computer File Burroughs 5500 Accessible by Magnetic Tape & Computer Cards

kirima
Download Presentation

Michigan Crash Records History Five Decades – Good & Bad

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Michigan Crash Records History Five Decades – Good & Bad

  2. 1960s CRASH System • 1966 First Surface Transportation Safety Act • Required Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) • 1966 First Statewide Computer File • Burroughs 5500 • Accessible by Magnetic Tape & Computer Cards • Uniform Reporting Form UD-10 • Crash Data Located on State Routes Only

  3. 1970s CRASH System • 1970 - Michigan Accident Locating System Proposed • Featured Analysis Software and Statewide Locating • 1973 - MALI Development Started • MALI Database Provides for Automated Locating using Two Linear Reference Systems • 1976 – MALI Software Implemented, Crash Data Located on State Routes • 1979 – MALI Database Complete, Crashes Located Statewide

  4. 1980s CRASH System • Michigan’s System Recognized Nationally as Model Crash System • Data Shared with MDOT, UMTRI, TIA, MPOs • Comprehensive Redesign Proposed • Budget Cuts – Cause Backlog in Posted Data • Redesign Effort Fails • Decade Ends with Significantly Degraded System

  5. 1990s CRASH System • 1992 – To Improve Efficiency Bubbled Form Introduced • Quality Issues Result from Data Collected by 20,000 Officers Rather Than by Centralized Staff • Electronic Data Collection Proposed & Prototype Developed • Second Comprehensive Redesign Proposed • MALI Database Updating Eliminated • Redesign & Electronic Data Collection Initiative Fail • MALI Database Conflated to Statewide Geographic Framework Database

  6. 2000 CRASH System • 2000 Automated Locating Converted to Framework Database – Location Success Drops to 70% • 2001 – TRANStip Process Improvement Conducted • 2002 – Comprehensive System Redesign Initiated • 2003 – First Development Phase Implemented • 2003 – 2006 Four Additional Development Phases Implemented • New System Eliminates Backlog, Implements QA/QC Programs, Introduces Web Analysis • 2006 – Crash Data Submitted Electronically from 10 Law Enforcement Agencies • Michigan’s System Recognized Nationally as Model Crash System

More Related