1 / 36

Nintendo Wii Sensor Bar Replacement

Nintendo Wii Sensor Bar Replacement. Group 9 Jacob Huh, Scott Kammlade, and Nathaniel Toca April 25, 2008. Wii Sensor Bar. Infrared (IR) light source Controller contains IR sensor Sensor detects controller position relative to IR light source. Sensor Bar Replacement.

kirima
Download Presentation

Nintendo Wii Sensor Bar Replacement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Nintendo Wii Sensor Bar Replacement Group 9 Jacob Huh, Scott Kammlade, and Nathaniel Toca April 25, 2008

  2. Wii Sensor Bar • Infrared (IR) light source • Controller contains IR sensor • Sensor detects controller position relative to IR light source

  3. Sensor Bar Replacement • Mobile IR light source • Controlled through eye movements • Reduces space and movement required for play • Adjustable for each user

  4. Replacement System

  5. EOG Theory • Front of the retina is electropositive with respect to the back of the retina • Electrodes can detect differential voltage • Electrode becomes more positive as eye moves toward it • i.e. - electrodes above and below the eye determine the vertical direction of gaze

  6. Electrode Placement • Horizontal: A and B • Vertical: C and D • Reference: E

  7. EOG Circuit • Four main component: • Stage 1&3: amplification • Stage 2&4: high & low-pass filter

  8. Previous EOG Circuits • Spring 1999: Alex Chu, Everest Chiu

  9. Comparison • Main difference: LM741 to AD622 chip • Benefits of using AD622: 1) Gain set with single resistor 2) Excellent noise rejection 3) Can control Voffset • AD622 well-suited for calibration

  10. EOG Circuit

  11. Microcontroller Software

  12. Microcontroller Circuit

  13. Microcontroller Circuit

  14. LED Matrix Aspect ratio TV aspect ratios – 4:3 and 16:9 Need more horizontal resolution than vertical 10:8 is a practical compromise Distance from remote Ideally – very close Reality – being too close results in frequently “lost” cursor Tradeoff in selectable screen area

  15. LED Matrix Circuit

  16. LED Matrix • X-Y addressing • LED’s respond to voltage difference • Column selected with low voltage (desired column = low, all others = high) • Row selected with high voltage (desired row = high, all others = low) • Current limiting • 1k Resistors at row inputs • For V = 5V, I = 5mA

  17. LED Matrix Circuit

  18. Test Results

  19. EOG Stage 1: Pre-amplification • Trace 1: Input • 106 mVpp • Trace 2: Output • 9.19 Vpp • Gain: 9.19V/106 mV = 86.7

  20. EOG Stage 2: High Pass Filter • -3dB Freq: • Vout = 0.71Vin • Trace 1: Input • Trace 2: Output • -3dB Freq: 0.155 Hz

  21. EOG Stage 3: Amplification • Trace 1: Input • 56 mVpp • Trace 2: Output • 103 mVpp • Min Gain: 1.87 • Max Gain:~ 1000

  22. EOG Stage 4: Low Pass Filter • Trace 1: Input • Trace 2: Output • -3dB Freq: 29.94 Hz

  23. EOG Common Mode Rejection Ratio • CMRR measures ability to reject noise present on both inputs • Difficult to measure – various techniques • Ratio of common mode input voltage and differential input voltage for which output is the same • CMRR = 20 log (Vc / Vd) • Previous EOG groups used different measurement technique

  24. EOG Common Mode Rejection Ratio • Vc = 3.643 V • Vd = 0.48 mV • CMRR = 20 log (3.643 / 0.00048) = 77.6 dB

  25. EOG Calibration Out In Vertical Horizontal

  26. EOG Signal-to-Noise Ratio • Signal ~ 5V • Noise ~ 0.08V • SNR ~ 62.5 • Limiting factor in size of LED array

  27. Microcontroller Testing • 0-5 Vpp signal input to microcontroller • Output of each pin observed • Trace 1: Input Signal • Trace 2: Pin Output 1 2 2 1

  28. Microcontroller Test Results

  29. Microcontroller Test Results

  30. Response Time • Trace 1: Input to EOG • Trace 2: LED signal • Response time faster than the 60Hz at which televisions operate 2 1

  31. LED Matrix Testing • Cannot visually verify which LED is lit • Connectivity tests using DMM • 8x8 visible LED matrix purchased for LED addressing tests

  32. Operation with Wii • Strengths • Very intuitive • Fast response • Well-suited for menu navigation • Weaknesses • Limited resolution • Limited downward movement • Difficult to calibrate

  33. Opportunities • Automatic calibration • Get rid of electrodes • Larger and denser LED array • Transition to monolithic LED matrix is ideal • Noise reduction • Integration with Wii controller

  34. Marketability • Cost • Component Costs • IR LEDs - $0.40 each • ICs ~ $15 total • Replacement Electrodes • Safety Issues • Macroshock • Current-limiting resistors

  35. Credits • Dr. Kenneth Gentry • Mr. Tomasz Wojtaszek • Mr. Mark Smart

  36. Thank You

More Related