1 / 18

Matthew W. Sherwood, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P. Curtis, Eric D. Peterson, Sunil V. Rao

Patterns of red blood cell transfusion use and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary clinical practice: Insights from the NCDR ®. Matthew W. Sherwood, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P. Curtis, Eric D. Peterson, Sunil V. Rao. Disclosures.

kitra
Download Presentation

Matthew W. Sherwood, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P. Curtis, Eric D. Peterson, Sunil V. Rao

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Patterns of red blood cell transfusion use and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary clinical practice: Insights from the NCDR® Matthew W. Sherwood, Yongfei Wang, Jeptha P. Curtis, Eric D. Peterson, Sunil V. Rao

  2. Disclosures Matthew W. Sherwood – None Yongfei Wang – None Jeptha P. Curtis – None Eric D. Peterson – Research Support >10K : Eli Lilly, Janssen Pharm., PI of Data Analytic Center for ACC Sunil V. Rao– Research grants - Ikaria, sanofi-aventis; Consultant/honoraria - The Medicines Co, Terumo Medical, ZOLL, Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo Lilly, Janssen

  3. Funding Support and Disclaimer This research was supported by the American College of Cardiology Foundation’s National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR). The views expressed in this presentation represent those of the author(s), and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NCDR or its associated professional societies identified at www.ncdr.com.

  4. Background • Prior studies have shown that there is marked variation in the use of red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) among patients with acute coronary syndromes • Contemporary post-procedure RBCT patterns in patients undergoing PCI are unclear • Documenting variation in RBCT practice is important since RBCT has been independently associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with ischemic heart disease

  5. Objectives • To determine the variability in use of RBCT in hospitals across the United States • To determine patient factors associated with RBCT • To determine whether RBCT has an independent association with patient outcomes • Is an association of transfusion with outcomes independent of bleeding

  6. Methods • Database – NCDR®Cath-PCI® database • Patients – 1,323,965 patients undergoing PCI at 1282 hospitals between 7/2009-9/2011 • Exclusions • patients who underwent in-hospital CABG • More then 1 PCI during hospital stay • Missing data on bleeding events, procedural complications, d/c status

  7. Outcomes and Definitions • Primary – Transfusion rates • Secondary – Clinical Outcomes • MI • Stroke • In-hospital Death • Definition – Bleeding Events • Hemoglobin drop of ≥3 g/dL • Transfusion of whole blood or packed red blood cells • Procedural intervention/surgery at the bleeding site to reverse/stop or correct the bleeding

  8. Analyses • Rates of transfusion by site were determined and then risk adjusted rates were calculated • Patient clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between patients who did and did not receive RBCT • Logistic regression was used to determine the adjusted association between RBCT and in-hospital death, MI, or stroke • Secondary analyses performed to determine whether any adverse effect of transfusion was independent of bleeding events

  9. Patient Characteristics P values for all comparisons <0.001

  10. Transfusion Pattern by Hgb

  11. Transfusion Rates by hospital site

  12. Adjusted transfusion rates Number of hospitals Risk adjusted for all variables in the established NCDR mortality and bleeding models

  13. Outcomes by transfusion status P values for all comparisons <0.001

  14. Independent assoc. of RBCT with outcomes All patients Model includes all variable in the established NCDR mortality model; Reference is no transfusion

  15. Independent assoc. of RBCT with outcomes Patients without bleeding Model includes all variable in the established NCDR mortality model; Reference is no transfusion

  16. Limitations • Data is observational thus events are reported, not adjudicated • Temporal relationship between Hct, transfusion, and events is uncertain • Cannot infer causality

  17. Conclusions • Considerable variation in transfusion practices exists across the U.S., and persists after adjustment for patient differences • Transfusion patterns by Hgb level are different in patient with bleeding vs. without bleeding • RBCT is independently associated with adverse cardiac events in patients undergoing PCI • This association still holds in patients without bleeding events

  18. Clinical Implications • Our results are consistent with prior reports demonstrating the potential hazard associated with RBCT among ACS patients • Randomized trials of transfusion strategies are needed in patients undergoing PCI to guide clinical practice • Until these data are available, operators should continue to adopt practices that reduce the risk for bleeding and transfusion

More Related