730 likes | 3.35k Views
DEPARTMENTATION. THE TERM : ‘DEPARTMENT’. DEPARTMENT DESIGNATES A DISTINCT AREA , DIVISION OR BRANCH OF AN ENTERPRISE OVER WHICH A MANAGER HAS AUTHORITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES
E N D
THE TERM : ‘DEPARTMENT’ • DEPARTMENT DESIGNATES A DISTINCT AREA , DIVISION OR BRANCH OF AN ENTERPRISE OVER WHICH A MANAGER HAS AUTHORITY FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF SPECIFIED ACTIVITIES • THE LIMITATION ON THE NUMBER OF SUBORDINATES THAT CAN BE DIRECTLY MANAGED WOULD RESTRICT THE SIZE OF ENTERPRISES, IF IT WERE NOT FOR THE DEVICE OF DEPARTMENTATION
DEPARTMENTATIONIS DONE BY • SIMPLE NUMBERS • TIME • ENTERPRISE FUNCTION • TERRITORY • PRODUCT • CUSTOMER • MARKET-ORIENTATION • PROCESS / EQUIPMENT • SERVICE • GOTOMATRIX ORGANISATION:
DEPARTMENTATION BY SIMPLE NUMBERS • ONCE AN IMPORTANT METHOD IN TRIBES, ARMIES ETC • BASED ON WORK –FORCE BASIS • NOW ON A DECLINE DUE TO SPECIALISATION • ALSO AS IT IS USED MORE ON THE LOWER LEVELS OF ORGANISATION STRUCTURE • BACK
DEPARTMENTATION BY TIME • OLDEST FORMS OF DEPARTMENTATION • USE OF TIME • SHIFT WORKERS • PROBLEM CROPS UP IN THE ‘GRAVEYARD SHIFT’ • MANAGEMENT THEN IS DIFFICULT • BACK
DEPARTMENTATIONBY ENTERPRISE FUNCTION • WIDELY ACCEPTED PRACTICE • HOW DID THIS COME ABOUT? • FUNCTIONAL DEPARTMENTATION VERY USEFUL
ADVANTAGES: • LOGICAL AND TIME PROVEN • POWER AND PRESTIGE CONCENTRATED AT THE TOP • OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALISATION • SIMPLIFIES TRAINING • ACCOUNTABILITY • TIGHT CONTROL
DISADVANTAGES: • “WALLS” BETWEEN DEPARTMENTS • RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROFITS ON TOP ONLY • OVERSPECIALISES • REDUCES CO-ORDINATION BACK
DEPARTMENTATION BY TERRITORY • ATTRACTIVE TO LARGE SCALE FIRMS • ACTIVITIES ARE PHYSICALLY AND GEOGRAPHICALLY SPREAD • E.g.: L.I.C ; INCOME TAX DEPT etc.
EAST CENTRAL S.E S.W WEST PERSONNEL ENGG. PRODUCTION ACCOUNTING SALES
ADVANTAGES: • PLACES RESPONSIBILITY AT LOWER LEVEL • IMPROVES CO-ORDINATION • BETTER COMMUNICATION • MORE FOCUS ON LOCAL MARKETS • FURNISHES GOOD TRAINING GROUND FOR FUTURE MANAGERS
DISADVANTAGES: • REQUIRES GOOD CALIBRE MANAGERS • TENDS TO MAKE CENTRAL SERVICES DIFFICULT • INCREASES PROBLEMS OF CONTROL BACK
DEPARTMENTATION BY PRODUCT • GROUPING ON THE BASIS OF PRODUCT • REDUCES COMPLEXITY IN MANAGERIAL FUNCTIONS
ELEC. METER DIV. INSTRUMENT DIVISION INDICATOR LIGHTS DIV. INDL. TOOLS DIV. ENGG. PROD. ACCOUNTING
ADVANTAGES: • PLACES ATTENTION AND EFFORT ON PRODUCT • PLACES RESPONSIBILITY FOR PROFITS AT DIVISIONAL LEVEL • IMPROVES CO-ORDINATION OF FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITIES • GOOD TRAINING FOR FUTURE MANAGERS • PERMITS GROWTH AND DIVERSITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
DISADVANTAGES: • REQUIRES GOOD CALIBRE MANAGERS • INCREASE PROBLEMS IN CONTROL • BACK
CUSTOMER DEPARTMENTATION • CUSTOMERS ARE THE KEY TO THE WAY ACTIVITIES ARE GROUPED • USED IN DIFFERENT KINDS OF ENTERPRISES • E.g. EDUCATIONAL INSTITUITIONS
ADVANTAGES: • CONCENTRATION ON CUSTOMER NEEDS • GIVES THE CUSTOMER THE FEELING THAT THE SUPPLIER IS VERY UNDERSTANDING • DEVELOPS EXPERTISE IN CUSTOMER AREA
DISADVANTAGES: • CO-ORDINATION OF ACTIVITIES BETWEEN COMPETING CUSTOMERS • REQUIRES A MANAGER WHO IS AN EXPERT IN CUSTOMERS’ PROBLEMS • CUSTOMER GROUPS HAVE TO BE PROPERLY DEFINED • BACK
MARKET-ORIENTED DEPARTMENTATION • DEPARTMENTATION AROUND MARKETING CHANNELS USED • LIKE CUSTOMER DEPARTMENTATION , ONLY THIS CONCENTRATES ON CHANNEL
ADVANTAGES: • CONCENTRATES ON MARKETS AND MARKETING CHANNELS • DEVELOPS OPPORTUNITIES FOR MORE EFFICIENT MARKETING ACTIVITIES
DISADVANTAGES: • LOSS OF CONCENTRATION ON PRODUCT GROWTH, PROFITS • TRAINING PEOPLE TO THINK IN TERMS OF MARKET RATHER THAN PRODUCT • PROBLEMS IN CO-ORDINATION • BACK
PROCESS / EQUIPMENT DEPARTMENTATION: • EMPLOYED IN MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS • DEPARTMENTS CARRY OUT PARTICULAR OPERATIONS • GIVES RISE TO A DEGREE OF DECENTRALISATION • ACHIEVES ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE • BACK
SERVICE DEPARTMENTS: • SPECIALISED DEPARTMENT FOR PURPOSE OF EFFICIENCY AND CONTROL • TEND TO BE USED TO PROVIDE EXPERT ADVICE • “AUXILIARY” OR “SUPPORT “ DEPARTMENTS
ADVANTAGES: • COST SAVING • DEVELOPMENT OF HIGH DEGREE OF EXPERTNESS IN SPECIALIST SERVICE
DISADVANTAGES: • DANGERS OF “ EFFICIENT INEFFICIENCY” • DANGER OF SERVICE DEPARTMENTS EXERCISING TOO MUCH CONTROL • PROBLEMS OF OBTAINING ADEQUATE SERVICE
SERVICE DEPTS SHOULD REMEMBER THAT-- • THEIR TASK IS SERVICE • THEY SHOULD BE AS CLOSE TO THE POINT OF SERVICE AS POSSIBLE • THEY SHOULD CHARGE SERVICE COSTS TO THE USERS • NEVER OVERLOOK POSSIBILITIES OF USING OUTSIDE SERVICES • BACK
MATRIX ORGANISATION: • COMMONLY CALLED THE “GRID” ORG. • COMPROMISE BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL AND PRODUCT DEPARTMENTALISATION • WHY IS IT USED? • SBUs – THE STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNIT • GOTO
WHY IS IT USED? • ENTERPRISES AND CUSTOMERS INTERESTED IN END RESULTS • PRESSURE TO ESTABLISH RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE RESULTS • PRESSURE FOR RESOURCES • BACK
STRATEGIC BUSINESS UNITS • DISTINCT LITTLE BUSINESSES SET UP IN A LARGER COMPANY TO ENSURE THAT A CERTAIN PRODUCT IS HANDLED AS AN INDEPENDENT UNIT • GE BEGAN THIS
SBU HAS.. • ITS OWN MISSION DISTINCT FROM OTHER DIVISIONS • DEFINABLE GROUPS OF COMPETITION • PREPARES ITS OWN PLANS • MANAGES ITS OWN RESOURCES • A PROPER SIZE • ITS OWN MANAGER • MATRIX ORGANISATION:
WHICH IS THE BEST PATTERN? • DEPENDS… • SHOULD FACILITATE ACHIEVEMENT OF OBJECTIVES • MIXING OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DEPARTMENTATIONS? • PRINCIPLE OF DIVISION OF WORK…
PRINCIPLE OF DIVISION OF WORK: • THE MORE AN ORGANISATION STRUCTURE REFLECTS THE TASKS OR ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO ATTAIN GOALS AND ASSISTS IN THEIR CO-ORDINATION, AND THE MORE ROLES ARE DESIGNED TO FIT THE CAPABILITIES AND MOTIVATIONS OF PEOPLE AVAILABLE TO FILL THEM, THE MORE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT AN ORGANISATION STRUCTURE WILL BE .
FAYOL SAYS: • DIVISION OF WORK ENABLES US TO PRODUCE MORE AND BETTER WORK WITH THE SAME EFFORT.