140 likes | 164 Views
Insight into TF-VSS activities for a European videoconferencing service, including service specifications, architecture, support implementation, and proposal options. Details on the feasibility study, large institutions' responses, and GN2 proposals. Discussion on central versus shared resources, gateways, data collaboration, and federated support.
E N D
TF-VSS proposal for a Pan-European videoconferencing serviceAndrás Kovács, NIIF/HUNGARNETakov@niif.hu TERENA TAC meeting Lyngby, Denmark 21st May 2007
Overview of TF-VSS • TF-VSS: Videoconference Service Studies group • Mandate: 01/10/2006 – 30/09/2007 • Preliminary support for a European VC service: • Gather needs and general views • Prepare a specification (recommendation) • High level technical plans • GN2 Y4 proposal preparation • Feasibility study • Reminder: • GN2 Y3 → failed • Technical complexity, lack of motivation NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Status of TF-VSS activities NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Activity A2 • Web survey: • NREN/institutional VC deployments and mid-term plans • Approach to a European VC service • D2.1 available at TF activities’ page: • http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-vss/activity_areas.html • Responders: 19 European NRENs and 11 large institutions NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Activity A3 / GN2 proposal I. • Service specification: D3.1 is available • Basic (1st phase) and advanced (2nd phase) service • Pros & cons of central and shared implementations NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Architecture: central resource NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Architecture: shared resource NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Activity A3 / GN2 proposal II. • For both implementations: • Free gatekeeper (H.323) and registrar (SIP) services • Central reservation website (localised) • Federated AAI • Federated European-scale directory • Standardised video codecs: H.261, H.263 and H.264 • Gateways (e.g. ISDN, VRVS/EVO, etc.) • Data collaboration • API based MCU control • . . . NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Federated directory NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
European level VC support • Implementation of support: • Hierarchical (European, national, institutional level) • NRENs: round robin basis (see e.g. GN2 PERT) • Important: GDS, coordinating between NREN support groups • Operational model to be worked out… NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
GN2 Y4 proposal III. • Preliminary proposal: • Presented at GN2 Y4 planning meeting (2nd April) • Draft work items specified • Option A (shared) and option B (central): • Partners: CESNET, CSC, GRNET, NIIF, • REDIRIS, SWITCH (informal survey) • Manpower bids: 6MM • Very low/limited motivation and contribution NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
GN2 Y4 proposal IV. • Proposal refinement: • In progress… based on feedback (GN2) • Central resource was chosen (human resources) • Budget: 200-250kEuro (vendor offers) • Work items finalised • Available for contribution and comments/ideas • Reduce complexity, and minimise human resource needs • Decision should be taken: continue or not • Provide official feedback: • Work item participation • Manpower bids NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
GN2 Y4 proposal V. - Options • Options to chose: • Proposal as it is… (+MCU, +support, +reservation, +dir, …) • Reduced 1 (-MCU, +support, -reservation, +dir, …) • Cancel proposal • . . . NIIF– http://www.niif.hu
Thank you for your attention ? http://www.terena.org/activities/tf-vss/ Questions/feedbacks: akov@niif.hu NIIF–http://www.niif.hu