1 / 30

Status of QEP at Angelina College Fall 2007

Status of QEP at Angelina College Fall 2007. Presented By Monica Peters. Overview of Fall 2006. Lee College Visit (October 2006) Monitoring Report (November 2006) Draft of Implementation Plan (November 2006) Initial Meeting with Division Facilitators. Overview of Spring 2007.

kohana
Download Presentation

Status of QEP at Angelina College Fall 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of QEP at Angelina CollegeFall 2007 Presented By Monica Peters

  2. Overview of Fall 2006 • Lee College Visit (October 2006) • Monitoring Report (November 2006) • Draft of Implementation Plan (November 2006) • Initial Meeting with Division Facilitators

  3. Overview of Spring 2007 • Finalized Implementation Plan (February 2007) • Administration of the CCSSE • Administration of the CCTST (April 2007)

  4. Division Facilitators and Committees

  5. Formation of the Faculty Learning Community (FLC) • Interdisciplinary group of faculty and staff • Comprised of the 6 Division Facilitators • Identifies and addresses institutional need (Topic-based or Cohort Based) • Year-long process of development and implementation • Topic Based – Critical Thinking

  6. FLC – Critical Thinking • Faculty LearningCommunity to Study and Implement the Pedagogy of Critical Thinking • FLC 1 – “The Pilots” • Business – Keith New • Fine Arts – Burlon Wilkerson • Health Careers – Alyssa Bass • Liberal Arts – Edith Miller • Science and Mathematics – Charlotte Barker • Technology and Workforce – Tara Newman

  7. Implementation Plan • Summer/Fall 2007- Training • Spring 2008 – Course Development • Critical Thinking Enhanced Curriculum (CTEC) • Fall 2008 – CTEC Implementation • Fall 2008/Spring 2009 – Assessment

  8. Training Phase 1 • Assessment Conference at Texas A&M • Critical Thinking Conference – Berkeley • Semester long training on the Paul/Elder model (curriculum)

  9. Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life – Richard Paul/Linda Elder

  10. Course Development Phase 2 • Critical Thinking Enhanced Curriculum • CTEC • Selection of course • More than one section • STSU 0300 – Section 1 • STSU 0300 – Section 2

  11. Course Development Phase 2 • Curriculum – Teaching, learning, and assessment materials for a course • A crucial part of the curriculum is the definition of the course objectives which are often expressed in terms of learning outcomes and normally includes the assessment strategy for the program. • COURSE PORTFOLIOS • Syllabus (course objectives) • Critical Thinking Exercises for each Topic or Chapter Introduced • Critical Thinking Assessments

  12. Course DevelopmentPhase 2 • Consultation of the FLC1 with FLC2 • Alternates for the FLC becomes FLC2 • Business – Occie Cluff • Fine Arts – Reginald Reynolds • Health Careers – Marilyn Craig • Liberal Arts – Debbie Jenke • Science and Mathematics – Tom Dudley • Technology and Workforce – Vicky Milstead

  13. CTEC Implementation and Assessment • Pre/Post Test – California Critical Thinking Skills test • CT Rubric – assess specified CT exercises • Faculty Learning Community Student Learning Survey (informal) • Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Form (formal) *

  14. Data CollectedSpring 2009 • CCSSE • Spring 2005; Spring 2007 • CCTST • Baseline data (Spring 2007) • Pre-Assessment (Fall 2008) • Post-Assessment (Fall 2008) • FLC Student Learning Survey – 6 • SLOA Form - 6

  15. Data CollectedSpring 2010 • CCSSE • Spring 2005; Spring 2007; Spring 2009 • CCTST • Baseline data (Spring 2007) • Pre-Assessment (Fall 2008) (Fall 2009) • Post-Assessment (Fall 2008) (Fall 2009) • FLC Student Learning Survey – 12 • SLOA Form - 18

  16. Course Implementation Fall 2008/FLC1 – 6 Courses Fall 2009/FLC1 + FLC2 – 12 Courses 18 Courses Fall 2010/FLC1+FLC2+FLC3 – 18 Courses 36 Courses – 6 in each division

  17. Initially, the QEP should focus on the planning and implementation process Next, our focus is evaluating the overall goals of the QEP to look at the impact on student learning and expected outcomes

  18. In reference to the QEP…Student learning is at the heart of the mission of all institutionsShould complement the institution’s planning and evaluation process

  19. Institutional Effectiveness Institutional effectiveness is the systematic, explicit, and documented process of measuring performance against the mission in all aspects of an institution. • Core Requirement 2.5 • Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1 • Comprehensive Standard 3.4.1

  20. Core Requirement 2.5 – process for producing improvement and accomplishing it’s mission • The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission.

  21. Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1 - requires that an institution identify and evaluate outcomes and demonstrate improvement based on the results of that evaluation. The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

  22. How has the QEP been integrated into the institution’s ongoing planning and evaluation processes?

  23. Typical Process for IE • Mission Statement • Strategic Plan (Institutional Goals and Objectives) • Annual Unit/Department (Objective, Strategy, Outcomes) • Program and Learning Outcomes - Assessments

  24. Mission Statement Strategic Plan (Institutional Goals and Objectives) Annual Unit/Department (Objective, Strategy, Outcomes) Program and Learning Outcomes - Assessments IE Process

  25. Goals of the QEP • Common understanding amongst faculty and staff of CT model • Implementation of CT across the curriculum • Student integration of CT beyond higher education

  26. Writing a Unit Plan for QEP • What are the goals tied to? • We have objectives/strategies • outcomes • Mission Statement • Strategic Plan

  27. Mission Statement The mission of Angelina College is to provide quality educational opportunities and services to aid students in reaching their full potential.

  28. Strategic Plan • ACCESS • QUALITY INSTRUCTIONAL OUTCOMES • PARTNERSHIPS - QUALITY OF LIFE • LEARNING ENVIRONMENT • RESOURCE MANAGEMENT • PERSONNEL LEADERSHIP • IMAGE

  29. IE/QEP Link http://www.angelina.edu/QEP/institutional_effectiveness.htm

More Related