1 / 16

TOP200 UKRAINE - THIRD UNIVERSITY RANKING

TOP200 UKRAINE - THIRD UNIVERSITY RANKING. Dr. O. LINOVITSKAYA , Institute for Applied Information Technologies. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “ Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics “. 30.09.2014. 1. Organizational aspects.

korbin
Download Presentation

TOP200 UKRAINE - THIRD UNIVERSITY RANKING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TOP200UKRAINE - THIRD UNIVERSITY RANKING Dr. O. LINOVITSKAYA, Institute for Applied Information Technologies www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, UkraineUNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 30.09.2014 1

  2. Organizational aspects The project «University ranking: TOP200” was implemented by UNESCO chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and Informatics” (Ukraine) based on the Memorandum signed on July 6, 2006 between this chair and UNESCO-CEPES. The UNESCO chair coordinates the work as to working out, introduction and development of international expertise of education quality and university ranking in Ukraine. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 2

  3. Organizational aspects www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 3

  4. Features of higher education in Ukraine. An increase of number of higher educational institutions for the last decade. Insufficient financing of universities, including scientific projects. Small number of publications of the university lecturers in foreign publications. Absence of objective and independent web-sources reflecting activities of universities. Lack of practice in the analysis of job placement for graduates from educational institutions. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, UkraineUNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 4

  5. The main criteria of the method were selected based on the following : Criteria must have unique interpretation; Must be accessible and easily checked up by public representatives; They must be universal in order to have the possibility to compare universities belonging to different groups; To enable to include national universities in international systems of rating. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 5

  6. Method of ranking universities in Ukraine Criteria, definitions, rating factors Activities of the higher educational institutions are estimated on the basis of the general index of rating estimation - ІG which is integral and determined by three complex criteria: ІG = ITj + ILj+ IIN j ITj — Index of quality of scientific pedagogical potential, the value of which changes in the range [0-50%]; IL j — Index of education quality, changes in the range [0-30%]; IINj — Index of international recognition, changes in the range [0-20%]. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 6

  7. Method of university ranking in Ukraine Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the table. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 7

  8. Method of ranking of universities in Ukraine Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the table. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 8

  9. Method of ranking of universities in Ukraine Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the table. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 9

  10. Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of witch with proper coefficients is resulted in the table. Method of ranking of universities in Ukraine www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 10

  11. Method of ranking of universities in Ukraine Ratio of quantitative and qualitative analysis of main criteria Ratio of quantitative and qualitative estimation 20% expert estimation 80% quantitative estimation www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 11

  12. Education institution Universities Data bases Regional centre District administration Internet Other organization NAC Administrative and Educational system “Osvita” Industrial complex www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 12

  13. Teaching staff Education program Research Student contingent • Data about students • progress; • attendant; • participation in social activities; • participation in scientific conferences; • number of masters; • number of post-graduates; • number of sent down students Main server of data base • register of universities; • applicant; • students; • graduates; • teachers; • University resources Number of theses (candidate,doctor); monograph, articles International cooperation Material and technical basis of university Expert estimation University monitoring System of determination of universities ranking on the basis of UIS University Ranking www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 13

  14. Stages of formation of Ukrainian universities ranking system 2006г - for the first time the methods of ranking was introduced at the conference IREG in Berlin. The Memorandum was signedbetween UNESCOchair“Higher technical education, applied system analysis and Informatics” (Ukraine) and UNESCO-CEPES.  2007г – project launch, the first ranking issue. At that stage only quantitative measures were used (16 indicators). Development of software informational project provision .  2008г – methods specification according to the best practices and recommendations. An increase of the used quantitative criteria up to 20 .  2009г – expert estimation is included into the ranking system. Introduction of the index of informational software. Launching the project on the formation of a unified informational ranking system. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 14

  15. 2007 2008 2009 Value of IG for period 2007 - 2008 ІGyear www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 30.09.2014 15

  16. Positive aspects of universities ranking Number of universitiesparticipatingintheprojecthasincreased. Moreuniversitiesactivelydiscusstheranking results. More universities have become members ofinternationalassociations. Discussionsinmassmediaaretheevidenceofrisinginterestofpublic, employersto the university ranking system, which in its turn influences the universities policies Publication of ranking resultsgivesthe public an access to earlier closed informationcharacterizingvariousaspectsofuniversityactivities. www.euroosvita.net Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“ 16

More Related