270 likes | 445 Views
2. Reputation promise/mission. The Auditor-General has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, it exists to strengthen our country's democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector through auditing, thereby building pu
E N D
1. Page 1
2. 2 Reputation promise/mission The Auditor-General has a constitutional mandate and, as the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) of South Africa, it exists to strengthen our country’s democracy by enabling oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector through auditing, thereby building public confidence.
This is our reputation promise.
3. Page 3 PART 1
An overview of the auditing process and standards
4. 4 The benefits of external auditing by the AGSA
The benefits of external auditing are to:
add credibility to the information provided,
assist in the strengthening of oversight, accountability and governance in the public sector,
assist in giving momentum to the process of transformation of financial management in the public sector, and
provide insights to facilitate foresight of decision-makers,
thus, making a difference in the lives of citizens.
5. 5 Different types of audits – mandatory audits of the AGSA Regularity audit
Financial audit (to provide comfort that financial information is fairly reflected and to enable proper oversight of financial management)
Required in terms of sections 4 and 20 of the Public Audit Act
Opinion on the fair presentation of information in the financial statements
Reflections on internal control
6. 6 Different types of audits – mandatory audits of theAGSA (cont.) Regularity audit
Good governance practices (internal audit, audit committees, legislative compliance, etc.)
Value for money through specific focus areas (transversal audits and sector auditing)
Includes a component of compliance auditing
7. 7 Different types of audits – mandatory audits of the AGSA (cont.) Audit of performance information
To provide comfort that performance information is fairly reflected and to enable good oversight of service delivery
Required in terms of sections 4 and 20 of the Public Audit Act
Conclusion on the report of an entity that deals with how well they have done against their predetermined performance objectives
8. 8 Different types of audits – discretionary audits of the AGSA
Performance auditing (including environmental auditing)
Permitted in terms of sections 4 and 20 of the Public Audit Act
Economic, efficient and effective utilisation of scarce resources
Considers the effects of policy implementation, but does not evaluate policy
9. 9 Different types of audits – discretionary audits of the AGSA (cont.) Investigations
Permitted in terms of section 5 of the Public Audit Act
Factual findings relating to financial misconduct, maladministration and impropriety
Based on allegations or matters of public interest
10. 10 Different types of audits – discretionary audits of the AGSA (cont.) Special audits
Permitted in terms of section 5 of the Public Audit Act
Agreed-upon procedures (required reviews relating to, for example, donor funding, certificates to ensure legislative compliance, etc.)
11. 11 Audit process (engagement activities and planning) A: Engagement activities
Before any audit work is performed, we:
Determine skills and competence requirements of the audit team (right people for the job)
Establish terms of engagement (responsibilities of management and auditor)
B: Planning
We assess risk at two levels:
Overall at financial statement level (looking at the entity in total)
Detailed at account/transaction level (looking at individual amounts)
12. 12 Audit process (engagement activities and planning) (cont.) Things that we look at are:
Understanding the entity and its environment
Understanding accounting information and internal control systems
Assessing risk (focus areas)
Determining materiality amounts (which would impact on users’ decisions)
Developing the audit strategy
How, when and how many items to audit in order to reduce the risk of an inappropriate audit opinion
13. 13 Audit process (execution) C: Execution (fieldwork)
We design audit procedures to address the risk identified in planning
We perform test checks (do not test all transactions/accounts 100%)
Sufficient (“enough evidence”)
Appropriate (“right type of evidence”)
How do we get evidence?
People
Paper
Place
14. 14 Audit process (evaluate, conclude and report) D: Evaluating, concluding and reporting
We review all evidence obtained during the audit process
We report on identified potential exceptions:
Qualitative (non-financial information)
Quantitative (rand value)
Management report:
Our audit findings are communicated to management via a management report
Management gives responses to findings in writing
Report includes financial and governance issues
This is not a public document, but be assured that all material findings will flow through to the audit report
15. 15 Audit process (evaluate, conclude and report) (cont.) Audit report
Audit report is a “reflection” of significant findings in the management report
This is a public document; a report is only public after tabling in Parliament or a provincial legislature, as follows:
Mandatory audits – as part of the annual report of the auditee, tabled by the auditee
Discretionary audits – as separate reports, tabled by the AGSA
16. 16 Audit communication Objective: to clarify audit expectations, ensure a smooth process and prevent surprises in the audit report
This can take the form of:
Leadership visibility
Engagement letters
Letters requesting evidence or clarifying audit findings
Structured meeting agendas
Audit steering committees
Report discussion meetings
Therefore much effort is placed on ensuring that the audit reports are beyond reproach
17. 17
18. Page 18 PART 2
Consolidated audit outcomes
PFMA 2008-09
19. 19 2008-09 Audit outcomes – Departments, entities and legislatures
20. 20
21. 21
22. 22
23. 23 Non-compliance with PFMA / Treasury Regulations – National and provincial departments
24. 24
25. Page 25 PART 3
Key focus areas for achieving clean audits
26. 26 THE KEY FOCUS AREAS TO MOVE TOWARDS CLEAN AUDIT OPINIONS Quality of financial statements
Ability to produce financial statements and quality management information throughout the period
Utilisation by leadership of credible financial information to proactively address emerging concerns
Strong governance arrangements
Effective internal audit functions and audit committees
Review of internal controls, risks and financial information throughout the period
Monitor action plans compiled to address previous audit deficiencies and the effect of implementing them
Effective oversight by the leadership
Administrative leadership should establish proper tone at the top and act timeously on “red flags”
Executive Authority must act decisively on obstacles hampering implementation of corrective action plans and on red flags brought to their attention by auditors and those charged with governance
Improve coordination and collaboration between PACs and Portfolio committees
27. 27 Questions