140 likes | 551 Views
Understanding the Pre-IDE Program: FDA Perspective. CAPT Stephen P. Rhodes, USPHS Director, IDE and HDE Programs Office of Device Evaluation AdvaMed AudioConference October 17, 2007. Collaboration with regulated industry are integral to our mission.
E N D
Understanding the Pre-IDE Program: FDA Perspective CAPT Stephen P. Rhodes, USPHS Director, IDE and HDE Programs Office of Device Evaluation AdvaMed AudioConference October 17, 2007
Collaboration with regulated industry are integral to our mission • Committed to communicating and interacting with our stakeholders • ODE/OIVD have 400+ meetings/year • Average 80 meetings per division: 2 meetings/wk/division (not including teleconferences) • FDAMA (1997): Early Collaboration meetings became regulation (Agreement, Determination meetings) AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Why Pre-Submission Discussions? • Benefits (to sponsors and FDA) • Design testing and development plans that will expedite review and approval • Save money and time • More collaborative approach • Minimize surprises • Cost (to sponsors and FDA) • Time and effort • Money AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Advice may be requested at any of these points in premarket phase: • Prior to conducting “proof of concept” animal studies • Preclinical • Prior to expanding clinical trials from feasibility to pivotal phase • Pre-PMA • Day 100 PMA meetings • Post-deficiency letter for 510(k) or PMA • Appeal a final decision on a PMA or 510(k) or an IDE disapproval • Agreement or determination meeting AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Prior to Proof of Concept • Discuss concepts, broad outline of test plan, bench test methodologies (e.g., use of consensus standards, need for animal studies, need for clinical studies) • Discuss possible regulatory pathways • Discuss potential combination product issues • Face-to-face meetings are usually not held at this stage (premature). AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Preclinical phase • Prototype evaluated in preliminary animal models • Proposed clinical application (possibly not specific patient population) and indication for use • FDA feedback on: • Bench testing plan – methods, standards • Animal study protocols • Feasibility study protocols • Preliminary guidance on SR/NSR (need for IDE) • Preliminary (non-binding) guidance on regulatory pathway • Feedback dependent on focused questions • PreIDE meetings/teleconferences encouraged at this stage AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Prior to initiating pivotal trials • Feasibility studies completed (or nearly so) • Device design finalized to extent possible • Animal studies completed (or in follow-up) • Pivotal trial protocol “fleshed out” (including 1º and 2º endpoints, duration, evaluation methods, statistical analysis) • Specific indication for use (and patient population) determined AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Prior to initiating pivotal trials (cont.) • FDA will give feedback on: • Need for further bench/animal studies • Need for pilot study prior to initiating pivotal study • Proposed pivotal study protocol: endpoints, duration, evaluation, statistical analysis plan • Proposed regulatory pathway • Proposed indication for use • Preliminary nonbinding feedback on expedited status, need for advisory panel meeting • Feedback dependent on focused questions • Meetings/teleconferences with FDA encouraged at this stage AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Scheduling informal pre-IDE meetings (not determination or agreement meetings) • Planning/scheduling may be done by project manager (usually 3-4 weeks after preIDE received) • Complete pre-meeting package needed before meeting will be scheduled • Divisions may have checklists/other guidelines for what is expected in pre-meeting package: Check! • Expect meeting to be cancelled/postponed if extensive new information submitted after meeting scheduled AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Pre-IDEs: What they are and what they are not • Tool to provide informal feedback on: • Preclinical test plan • Clinical/statistical test plan • NSR/Exempt investigations • OUS investigations • NOT intended to be: • A tool for negotiation • An iterative process • Modular review • Review of data (“pre-510(k)”, “pre-PMA”) • As in depth as an IDE or marketing application review • Legally binding • Method for dispute resolution AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Recommendations • FDA is doing our homework before your meeting; please do yours! • Think carefully about what you want to get from a meeting – are you ready to talk with FDA? • If you must make changes to device or protocol after pre-IDE package has been submitted, be prepared to cancel and reschedule • Manage your meeting time carefully • Bring right people to discuss focused questions • Ask for clarification AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
Recommendations • Do not expect FDA to: • Make guarantees or binding commitments (unless it is a determination or agreement meeting) • Approve study or clear/approve device at meeting • Act as a consultant • Give special treatment or favors • Hold to informal feedback provided years ago – technology does not stay constant • Have a series of meetings on the same topics – make the most of THIS meeting AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs
More Information • October 10, 2007 Federal Register Notice: • List of Guidance Documents under review in CDRH • Pre-PMA and Pre-IDE Meetings • http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/mdufma/guidance/agenda/fy08.html • CDRH Website: Device Advice http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/devadvice/ AdvaMed October 17, 2005 -- PreIDEs