1 / 18

Planes instrumented with APD’s for 1m 3 PPT –HCAL-CALICE

Planes instrumented with APD’s for 1m 3 PPT –HCAL-CALICE. J.Cvach, M.Janata, I.Pol ák, J.Weichert,, J.Zálešák, Š.Valkár, J.Žáček IOP-ASCR and IPN P –C U, Prague. Energ y resolution with APDs. Good linearity, small systematic deviation in the slope (beam not in the tile centre?)

kris
Download Presentation

Planes instrumented with APD’s for 1m 3 PPT –HCAL-CALICE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Planes instrumented with APD’s for 1m3PPT –HCAL-CALICE J.Cvach, M.Janata, I.Polák, J.Weichert,, J.Zálešák, Š.Valkár, J.Žáček IOP-ASCR and IPNP–CU, Prague Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  2. Energy resolution with APDs • Good linearity, small systematic deviation in the slope (beam not in the tile centre?) • No estimate of systematic error yet • Energy resolution comparison: Fit values for PM APD MC P1 0.1 ± 0.2 0.5 0.4 ± 0.2 P2(%) 21.0 ± 0.4 24.4 17.1± 0.1 SiPM values similar to PM values • reasons for worse resolution: • noise of APD • lower tile light yield (estimate: 17 ph.e./tile) • tile alignment ( alignment with beam) • calibration Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  3. Solution • APD, (APDg) tested with (3) preamps and best available scintillation tiles + WLS fibers. • Insensitive to high magnetic fields • Available Tile + WLS systems and arrangements for: • 1 APD in each tile • 3 Tiles on 1 APD Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  4. Material for 3 tile sizes 30 x 30mm - 900 tiles (30x30)/1m2 (x3) = 2700 tiles for 3 planes - 900 APDscintillating fibres – 2070mcalibration fibres – 2070m60 x 60mm - 225 tiles (15x15)/1m2 (x3) = 675 tiles for 3 planes – 225 APDscintillating fibres – 550mcalibration fibres – 550m120 x 120mm - 64 tiles (8x8)/1m2 (x3) = 192 tiles for 3 planes – 64 APDscintillating fibres – 160mcalibration fibres – 160m Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  5. Plane 1m2 instrumented with 60x60mm tiles Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  6. Detail of one row Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  7. Front view of absorbers and cassettes Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  8. Side view of 3 planes with light tight box Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  9. Side view + detail of mask for APD Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  10. Top view and side view of groves for WLS Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  11. 3D – view of tiles and reflection 3M foils Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  12. Four tiles equipped with four APDs readout by one preamp - board Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  13. Different geometries for WLS fibers Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  14. Different geometries for WLS fibers Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  15. Conclusions • Tested APD (Hamamatsu S 8864-55) show good performance – similar to PMT and SiPM. • We are looking for the cheap APD or APDg (1mm2) Suitable for the light detection from single tile. (See Preprint 11-03, ITEP, 2003.) • For the tested (3mm2) APD’s we prepared design for ‘Tile + WLS + APD’ instrumentation for 3 consecutive planes. Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  16. Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  17. Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

  18. Š. Valkár: APDs for 1m3

More Related