1 / 31

Creating cultural safety in speech-language and audiology services

Creating cultural safety in speech-language and audiology services. Jessica Ball University of Victoria. “Cultural safety”. What do we need to understand about some peoples’ sense of risk or danger when bringing themselves or a family member for screening, assessment or therapy?

kristopher
Download Presentation

Creating cultural safety in speech-language and audiology services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Creating cultural safety in speech-language and audiology services Jessica Ball University of Victoria

  2. “Cultural safety” What do we need to understand about some peoples’ sense of risk or danger when bringing themselves or a family member for screening, assessment or therapy? What can we do to create culturally safe environments and encounters?

  3. Cultural safety in nursing practice Maori origins: Dyck & Kearns; Papps & Ramsden UBC: Joan Anderson, Annette Brown, Vicki Smye, et al. U Sask: Verna St. Denis Assembly of First Nations Health Secretariat Conceptualized within post-colonial, post-national, feminist discourses. Recognizing & re-dressing power inequities

  4. What do we mean by ‘culture’ Culture - not just ‘dress, dinner, decorations’! - embodied in our identities, values, beliefs, life styles, and the ways we raise our children. Screening and assessment tools and interventions methods are cultural artifacts.

  5. Cultural un-safety: What is it? A subjective sense that one’s cherished values, goals, language, identity & ways of life are denigrated or threatened in an encounter, or that one is being asked to venture into a foreign culture without knowing how to function in it and without positive accompaniment.

  6. Indicators of cultural un-safety • ‘Denial’ of suggestions that there is a problem • Low utilization of available services • Low ‘compliance’ with service referrals or prescribed interventions • Reticence in interactions with service providers • Anger • Low self-worth

  7. Deepening understandings: Two research studies Problem: Perennial protests about lack of cultural relevance/appropriateness of tools & interventions transported from dominant culture to Indigenous children & families

  8. Study 1: Survey of 90 Aboriginal Early Childhood Programs about tools used. Funded by First Nations & Inuit Health Branch, Maternal & Child Health Branch Study 2: In-depth exploration in 4 Indigenous communities of whether mainstream tools can support family goals for children’s development (63 parents; 42 child development practitioners) Funded by Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council of Canada.

  9. Take home message: Process is a greater determinant of outcomes than content

  10. It’s about the ways the tools are used • The relationship context in which the tools are used (trust vs fear) • Who decides a tool or intervention will be used (consent?) • What tools are used • For what purposes (‘ammunition’, pathologizing, apprehending??) • What happens, or fails to happen, afterwards • INCLUSION of key family members in the process.

  11. Acculturation / Assimilation through professional services Contemporary context of rising: • ‘Standardization’ • Universal surveillance • ‘Best practice’ models • One-size-fits-all Technologies imported from the dominant (European heritage) culture perpetuate colonial imposition of policies, procedures, criteria, performance demands, and social exclusion of Indigenous caregivers of Indigenous children

  12. How can our best intentions really seem so dangerous? “My grandparents taught me that to truly understand the importance of something you must look back seven generations and you must look forward seven generations” Debbie Jette Cree Elder

  13. It’s about time! (Chronosystem – Bronfenbrenner, 1979) Once upon a time …pre-contact…intact cultures Colonialism – disruption & resistance Neo-colonialsm – resistance & healing Silencing minority voices / Awakenings Post-colonialism - revitalization of cultures Post-nationalism – beyond racialization & us/ them

  14. Reflexive practice uses a critical, socio-historical perspective Many Aboriginal parents want to preserve & protect their cultures and languages through child rearing & services (16% Aboriginal children Canada exposed to Indig lang at home) Protection of Indigenous language transmission falls within our scope of practice Historical & ongoing significance of basing programs in schools, of government-contracted workers visiting in homes, of surveillance, or the words like “intervention” “disability” & “special needs”

  15. “A litany of woes” “We hear a lot about what’s wrong with our kids. A lot of our kids know things that white kids growing up in cities don’t know. About who their ancestors are, and how they walked on this land. About living with nature. About where their food comes from. If they haven’t started learning the ABCs or having a big vocabulary by the time they go to school, it doesn’t mean they’re off track in their development.” Avoid processes that inflame ongoing negative stereotypes.

  16. Balanced perspective including strengths “We believe that every child is a gift, and has gifts. Isn’t there some way to use these observations to focus in on a child’s skills – what they CAN do – because we could work with that. If they’re good at cooking and they enjoy it, then they can be cooks. Not everyone has to be brainy or a speaker in the Big House to be happy.”

  17. So, it’s all about Them? • Culturally sensitive • Culturally appropriate • Culturally informed • Politically correct • Making space for the ‘Other’ Risk: ‘politics of guilt & resentment’ – polarities of ‘us & them’ / ‘perpetrators & victims’

  18. It’s about us! Braiding histories & futures across cultural boundaries (post-nationalism) Self-reflexivity – locating ourselves in terms of culture of origin, culture of choice, gender, age, income, education, creed Individuals, families & communities, like ourselves, are diverse & hybrid. Reflexive practice – understand the cultural embeddedness of our practice goals, methods, ‘norms’, frustrations, & what we construct as positive outcomes Example: English dialects – Do we interpret differences as defects? Do we promote assimilation through insistence on the one and the only way? Some First Nations ask us to preserve children’s home dialects of English while also teaching them to code switch into the English of the dominant culture (‘school English’)

  19. Cultural protocols Seek cultural knowledge – ask questions Show respect – ask permission Demonstrate reciprocity – learning, services given & taken Engage community accompaniment – find allies, colleagues, mentors in community of practice

  20. Personal reflexiveness Relational practice is founded on authentic encounters. Locate ourselves on cultural continuums. Introduce ourselves in terms of how our identities intersect many categories “I learned to leave my baggage at the door. Stopped needing to be the answer woman. Became open to what these women, these children, these Elders had to teach me. What we had in common was our desire to see them learn and grow to their full potential. What we needed to figure out was how to work together to see that happen.” (BH)

  21. Process Good process is culturally appropriate practice Grounded in relationships Pacing: Is this the right time to be offering this particular form of service? Family-centred “I was contracted as an SLP to work at the band-operated preschool. I learned patience! I had to wait for parents to feel comfortable with who I was and why I was there. I sat quietly at the side of the room for a year before any parents would engage in conversation with me. I had been there for two years before I ever assessed an individual chld. But I had formed some positive relationships and was familiar to the children by the time I started delivering a service.” (AHF)

  22. Partnerships Creating & negotiating relationships: • child • family members • community-based program staff • community leaders Knowledge sharing vs. informing Collaborative problem solving vs. expert/authority Reciprocal learning / mutual capacity building Co-constructing ways to move supports into place

  23. Positive purpose Awareness of colonial interventions that have depleted cultures, communities, & roles for families Informed consent Focus on strengths Avoid negative labeling Confidentiality Accountability The so-what? factor

  24. Make it matter • Ensure there are real benefits that will follow from monitoring, screening or assessment. • If few or no services, invest more in community-based capacity development than in screening & diagnosis • Work with primary caregivers to enable them to support speech, language, hearing • parents, guardians, other family members • ECEs, Infant Development, Supported Child Development practitioners,nurses, teachers • Navigator model (D. Olds) ensures a firm handshake between client and services needed

  25. Cultural safety is respectful engagement that supports & protects many paths to wellbeing “Finding our way to supporting wellness among diverse communities of children and families requires many pathways. No one approach, no one program model, will reach or work for everyone.” Meadow Lake Tribal Council Administrator

  26. Find out more. . . . visit www.ecdip.org

More Related