1 / 19

Fremantle Ports Truck Productivity Study – Update for FLC

Fremantle Ports Truck Productivity Study – Update for FLC. Jennifer Hall, Senior Logistics Analyst 29 August 2013. Contents. Background Truck Productivity Indicators Purpose of Study Key Findings of Data Analysis Next Steps. Background. Trucking vital to Fremantle container supply chain

kristy
Download Presentation

Fremantle Ports Truck Productivity Study – Update for FLC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Fremantle Ports Truck Productivity Study – Update for FLC Jennifer Hall, Senior Logistics Analyst 29 August 2013

  2. Contents • Background • Truck Productivity Indicators • Purpose of Study • Key Findings of Data Analysis • Next Steps

  3. Background • Trucking vital to Fremantle container supply chain • Currently handles approx 85% of total Port volume • Even if rail reaches 30% road volumes will increase • Both truck numbers and efficiency are key issues • Truck Survey measures of productivity have shown a stagnation since 2006 and decline over last 2 years • Explanations for this based largely on speculation and anecdotal evidence • A number of other issues need attention: • VBS “Mad minute” • Large number of carriers • Orderly transition to 24x7

  4. Truck Loading (Utilisation)

  5. Empty Running

  6. Purpose of Study • Develop reliable data on the container trucking industry • Understand what is driving carrier decisions • Identify factors impacting on productivity • Understand impacts of Terminal and Empty Park booking systems • Engage industry in defining issues and identify solutions • Assess feasibility of proposed improvement initiatives • Develop recommendation and strategy for the future • Consideration must be given to impacts on rail of improved trucking efficiency and productivity

  7. Number of Transport Carriers March 2013 October 2012 CMS August 2011 5 9 21 79 88 18 69 17 33 43 6 8 7 125 unique carriers 139 unique carriers 142 unique carriers

  8. Concentration of Carriers • The top 10 carriers handle 50% of the full TEU task • The top 31 handle 75% of the full TEU task, as illustrated • 111 carriers do the remaining 25% • Fremantle carrier numbers high cf other Ports Group D Group A Group B Group C

  9. Unladen Trucks – Tydeman Rd

  10. Import Export Balance • Significant imbalance in im/ex volume in WA: 50A% loaded imports, 25% loaded exports

  11. Time of Day Accessing Terminals (TEUs per Hour, DPW & Patrick Combined)

  12. Two Way Loading - Patrick CMS August 2011 October 2012 March 2013

  13. Two Way Loading - DPW CMS August 2011 October 2012 March 2013

  14. Two Way Loading – Port Precinct • Trucks per 18hr day • Theoretical two way maximum capacity of 66% (when current two way loading is combined with laden inbound) • However, balance of imports/exports per carrier, operating hours of ECPs, and other factors may restrict this August 2012

  15. Improved TTT at Terminals • Significant reductions in average TTT since 2010 • Greater ability for operators to move through facilities quickly • Possible efficiencies gained from one-way movements rather than coordinating Container Terminal & Empty Container Park bookings

  16. Impact of Increase in 40’ Containers

  17. Issues and possible solutions

  18. Questions? Doug Brindal Jennifer Hall Manager Logistics Senior Logistics Analyst P: 9430 3515 P: 9432 3662 E: doug.brindal@fremantleports.com.au E: jennifer.hall@fremantleports.com.au

More Related