1 / 13

Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch”

Learn how to create powerful P&T dossiers that stand out with clear writing, recognized research accomplishments, effective teaching practices, and impactful service. Get quarterly edits and yearly input to consistently improve your dossier. Receive honest criticism and guidance from a mentoring committee and off-campus mentors. This comprehensive guide covers all key elements for a successful P&T dossier.

krok
Download Presentation

Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch” • My Dossier • Quarterly edits • Yearly input/feedback • Mentoring committee • Off-campus mentors • Honest criticism • Consistent • Numbers had to be right • Words had to be clear • Was not perfect I will share with you the things that people told me they liked and didn’t like about my dossier.

  2. Expectations

  3. Highlights Summary (pg2)

  4. Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications

  5. Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research- Publications: Be Clear Good: Identified my role in each manuscript and clearly wrote what I did with manuscripts that were not from my program. Bad: It became long-winded, so one clean sentence was enough.

  6. Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Awards

  7. Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research – Awards: Identify Impacts Good: Identified my role in each project and clearly wrote numerical impacts & research contributions. Bad: It was a logistical nightmare and it reminded people about the 43 not-funded proposals.

  8. Research: Recognized Record of Accomplishments Research - Presentations Good: Identified each type of presentation and the presenter. Bad: I didn’t identify type of conference (international, national, etc.) and then I lost track of student and collaborator presentations.

  9. Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Mentoring Research Title & Diversity of Personnel in Research  Program YEAR

  10. Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Mentoring Research: Be Clear Good: My favorite part of the dossier was bragging about my students. Bad: It became hard to keep track of the numbers; it was a logistical nightmare.

  11. Teaching: Be a Good Teacher Teaching – Classroom Instruction • SAIS reports (Student Evaluation) – Appendix • Peer evaluation • Teaching development • Best Practices of Teaching Workshop • Tennessee Teaching and Learning Center • Kickoffs

  12. Service: Record institutional, disciplinary, and/or professional service Service – Make it integrate your appointment • 90% Research • Every published manuscript, review 2 manuscripts • Never turn down a grant review opportunity • 10% Teaching • Department committee (GSC) • Research & Teaching • 3MT competition for graduate students • Judge undergraduate research • Disciplinary/Professional • You already know what is expected in your field

  13. Preparing P&T dossiers with “punch” • My Dossier • Quarterly edits • Yearly input/feedback • Consistent • Was not perfect • Acknowledgements • Mentoring committee • Fellow faculty • Off-campus faculty • Students Contact: Plant Biotech 431 RFryxell@utk.edu

More Related