170 likes | 182 Views
This report provides an overview of accrued-to-date pension liabilities in Malta for the years 2006-2007, including the calculation methodology, pension reform impact, and sustainability considerations.
E N D
Accrued-to-date Pension Liabilities: Malta 2006-2007 Clyde Caruana Statistician Unit A2: Public Finance National Statistics Office Lascaris Valletta VLT 2000 Tel: 25997000 Fax: 25997205 / 25997103 E-mail: nso@gov.mt www.nso.gov.mt
Background • Eurostat/ECB Task force established in June 2006. • Review existing material on pension schemes. • Produce a uniform methodological framework for the compilation of statistical estimates of the assets and liabilities of pension schemes. • Calculation of pension liabilities is in line with the amended SNA 2008.
Background cont… • Reference is also being made in the drafting of a new ESA chapter. • Eventual inclusion of Supplementary Tables on pensions in social insurance in the National Accounts. • Further refinements planned. • The end result of this task is to present users with pension scheme data and providing the means of more comparable data.
Definition • Accrued-to-date liabilities (ADL) are the present value of pensions to be paid in the future on the basis of accrued rights; neither the future contributions of existing workers, nor the accrual of new rights by them are considered. • It is considered by the Eurostat/ECB task force to be the most appropriate approach for national accounts.
Accrued-to-date Liabilities • ADL is the only method which can be assimilated to conventional public debt. • Social Security contributions are, in most respects, equivalent to the purchase of a government liability. • There is in existence a ‘future promise’ between the government and worker, that the former shall pay an annual pension to the latter on retirement age. • However the pension scheme is still based on an unfunded PAYG system.
Compilation of ADL • National Statistics Office supplied all data to the University of Freiburg. • Income and Pension data were supplied by single years and gender. • The Maltese pension system falls under the non-core part of the supplementary table as it is still unfunded. • The General Government (non-core) covers the Social Security Pensions and the Treasury Pension.
Compilation of ADL • Pension Reform of 2006 was of utmost importance to this exercise. • Rise in the retirement age (from 60-61 to 65). • Increase in the number of contribution years (up to 40 years). • Change in the wage indexation after 2011 (from the current (wage growth – inflation) 90-10 to 70-30).
ADL Model • The model takes into account: - Future Population Projection Assumptions - 1.5% real growth in GDP and wages - 2.0% Inflation Rate - 3.0% Discount Rate (Real)
Outcome due to Pension Reform • Reform lead to the following future pension liability reductions: - €1.57 billion - 12.2% of Pension Entitlements (2006) - 30% of GDP
Definition of Benefit Obligation • ABO is a “termination liability”, the amount the agent would have to pay another party to assume the obligation to pay current workers their retirement benefits based on current salary levels. • PBO is a liability which is consistent with the “ongoing concern” assumption of accounting, which takes into consideration future wage increases.
Social Security Pension Scheme • ABO Method - €11.3 billion / 235.3% of GDP (2005) - €10.4 billion / 203.5% of GDP (2006) - €10.9 billion / 201.6% of GDP (2007) • PBO Method - €12.8 billion / 266.5% of GDP (2005) - €11.5 billion / 226.3% of GDP (2006) - €12.2 billion / 224.2% of GDP (2007)
Treasury Pension Scheme • ABO Method - €2.06 billion / 42.8% of GDP (2005) - €2.10 billion / 41.2% of GDP (2006) - €2.09 billion / 38.6% of GDP (2007) • PBO Method - €2.15 billion / 44.7% of GDP (2005) - €2.18 billion / 42.7% of GDP (2006) - €2.17 billion / 40.1% of GDP (2007)
Sustainability • The Accrued-to-date method does not reflect an argument for sustainability. • Sustainability requires the incorporation of employment and per capita income evolution over time. • Conclusion derived from ADL is that the higher the share of future public resources committed to pension expenditure the more GDP should increase. • If GDP growth is not adequate other adjustments will be necessary, i.e. either higher tax rates or further pension rights negation.