1 / 13

BENZODIAZEPINES RENEWALS BEYOND RECOMMANDED DURATIONS:

BENZODIAZEPINES RENEWALS BEYOND RECOMMANDED DURATIONS:. Which perceptions do GP’s who prescribe them, have ? J.P. Canévet, P. Le Mauff, R. Senand Département de MG Université de Nantes. CONTEXT and PURPOSE. Long term treatments with benzodiazepines are usual in France.

kuniko
Download Presentation

BENZODIAZEPINES RENEWALS BEYOND RECOMMANDED DURATIONS:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. BENZODIAZEPINES RENEWALS BEYOND RECOMMANDED DURATIONS: Which perceptions do GP’s who prescribe them, have ? J.P. Canévet, P. Le Mauff, R. Senand Département de MG Université de Nantes

  2. CONTEXT and PURPOSE • Long term treatments with benzodiazepines are usual in France. • Practitioners demobilization is often denounced. • Direct observation of prescription situations conclude to contrasted results. • Main purpose : identifying GPs intentions and representations, • Second purpose : . verifying if GPs are motivated to explore psychic life of their patients, . evaluating importance of compassion in their professionnal identity.

  3. METHOD  • Two focus groups including General Practitioners from 2 French Departments (Loire Atlantique / Vendée) • A grid of questions to explore the 3 EBM fields : - theoretical representation of treatments using benzodiazepines ? - representation of the patient request ? - suggestions to improve benzodiazepine prescription ( so that GPs intentions and GPs value systems can appear) ? • Registered and transcripted discussion • Content analysis (using a grid)

  4. RESULTS (1)KNOWLEDGE BUT LIMITED APPLICATION • GPs have a good knowledge concerning theoretical data and prescription risks. • None of them speaks about the necessity of an evaluation concerning : - insomnia or anxiety linked problems , - dependance intensity. • A minority does not recognize dependance reality.

  5. RESULTS (2)PATIENT REQUEST ANALYSIS :COMPASSION OR SELF-JUSTIFICATION ? Benzodiazepine request is justified as : - a request to relieve existential suffering ( and not a pathology) - a sign of social dysfunction - a denial of depression - addiction expression

  6. RESULTS (3)A KNOWN EMBARRASSMENT Participants had a good vision of their loss of professionnal identity, considering : - risks knowledge, and care about good practice, - identification of suffering and addiction for the patient, - and difficulty as withdrawal is concerned.

  7. RESULTS (4)WHY DO THEY PRESCRIBE ? All the GP’s prescribed with resignation : • not to face the withdrawal problems , • fatalism after a failure , • Not to face the risk of a possible destabilisation in chronical situations.

  8. RESULTS (5)GP JUSTIFICATIONS TO KEEP PROFESSIONALSELF-ESTIM • Sometimes with denying risks , • Other times attesting their intention to avoid more important risks (alcohol,...) • and sometimes to avoid conflict • In all cases : confusion between anxiety and dependance

  9. RESULTS (6)DIFFERENT SILENCES • None of the GPs speaks about the lack of consensual and valid rules to help patient in the withdrawal process, • None of them speaks about the institutional context (private system / pay per act medicine) • None of them speaks about the possible use of benzodiazepine by GPs themselves.

  10. RESULTS (7)INCOMPETENTS / COMPASSIONNAL GPs We observed an agreement concerning : (7.1) A feeling of incompetence as far as questioning psychic life of their patient is concerned. (7.2) A specific attention to favor a help and support relation in situations where patient is suffering

  11. RESULTS (7.1)A FEELING OF INCOMPETENCE ( IN THE DOCTOR/PATIENT RELATION ) • A lack of words to caracterize care without use of drugs • An almost exclusive pedagogic conception: - « explain » sleeping physiology,    - « explain » anxiety symptoms • A wish to delegate the job to psychologists and to patients groups.

  12. RESULTS (7.2)A PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY CARACTERIZED BY COMPASSION Strong proclamations attesting the specific attention to relieve… • « to give a shoulder to lean on » • « to provide well-being » • « to help suffering humanity » • « to care for « life injuries »  »

  13. CONCLUSION BENZODIAZEPINES : « A TRANSITIONNAL OBJECT » ? A CONTRADITIONbetween . compassion and . incompetence feeling, • that creates a sufferingin the population of prescriptors in front of the patients that suffer too, • that motivates a prescription as a symbol , symbol of a care relation that neither the doctor, neither his patient want to stop with a withdrawal.

More Related