170 likes | 293 Views
Spatial profiling of HEIs and the potential for regional innovation systems in Ireland. Prof. Rob Kitchin NIRSA, NUI Maynooth. Higher Education & Economic Development. Context – Innovation Ireland (2010); Smart Economy (2010) National innovation ecosystem – complex entities
E N D
Spatial profiling of HEIs and the potential for regional innovation systems in Ireland Prof. Rob Kitchin NIRSA, NUI Maynooth
Higher Education & Economic Development Context – Innovation Ireland (2010); Smart Economy (2010) National innovation ecosystem – complex entities • Entrepreneurs and enterprises • Investment in R&D • Education system, particularly HEIs (critical thinking, creativity and innovation) • Finance (venture capital) • Tax and regulatory environment • Public policy and institutions • “Knowledge is the currency of the innovation economy and the education system is pivotal in making innovation happen” (Innovation Ireland, p. 3)
Higher Education Landscape Context – Higher Education Strategy (2011) Key functions: • teaching and learning; • research and knowledge transfer; • external engagement Themes: Increased participation, new types of graduates, support for economic, social and cultural development; internationalisation A new framework for HE • mission differentiation • regional clusters – link with National Spatial Strategy • ‘directed diversity’ - end of laissez faire in higher education
Higher Education & Regional Organisation • Context – existing functional territories of HEIs • HEIs in Ireland have a well defined set of functional territories which map regionally • Some overlap of catchments, but fairly differentiated • No one institution has a truly national catchment • Differentiation of vertical linkages
The Universities NUIM DCU UCD TCD NUIG UL UCC
IoTs CIT DIT DKIT GMIT ITS WIT
Higher Education & Population Dynamics • 1991-2011 increase of over 1m (almost 30%) • Strong <19 demographic growth in next two decades • Regionally differentiated in pop demographics and education profile re. lifelong learning
National Age Profiles • Third-level population potentials (15-19 age cohort) have actually been in decline since 2002 • State decrease of -9.6% between ‘02 and ’11 • 283,019 within the 15-19 age cohort recorded in the 2011 Census • Meath is the only Local Authority with an increase (+2%)
National Age Profiles • Massive bulk of population coming down the line in all regions/local authorities and catchments • State increases of • +28.3% in 0-4 Age Cohort between 2002 and 2011 • +21.5% in 5-9 Age Cohort between 2002 and 2011 • In ten years time this could lead to very high levels of Higher Education enrolment
Regional Age Profile Projections • Between 2006 and 2026 the number of young persons (i.e. those aged 0-14 years) is projected to increase by 28.8% in the State as a whole • Projected Increases will vary across the regions (based on CSO Regional Population Projections 2006-2026)
Example: NUIM Catchment • Approx 5,500 enrolments to NUIM over the last 3 years (based on IT Feeder Schools – not inc. mature/international, etc) • Main catchment: Kildare (16.6%), Dublin City (12.4%), Meath (9.5), South Dublin (9.5%), Fingal (8.6%), Louth (5.8%), Westmeath (4.1%) and Offaly (3.4%) • Current 15-19 Age Cohort: 104,095 • Current 10-14 Age Cohort: 110,355 • Current 5-9 Age Cohort: 121,504 • Current 0-4 Age Cohort: 139,949 (projected enrolment = 7,394)
Higher Education & Regional Innovation System • Given these contexts (economic policy, HE strategy, existing regionalisation, population dynamics) one path forward is the active development of HE-led regional innovation systems • Within regions, autonomous but connected HEIs work in competitive collaboration, sharing and aligning HE provision and engaging with a region’s civil society and public/private sectors • At the same time retain and encourage diagonal and vertical linkages (cross-regional and international). Universities are national drivers of growth, not just regional drivers • This has already begun to happen through SIF, PRTLI, SFI initiatives and HEI strategic alliances, industry partnerships
Higher Education & RISs • From ‘districts’ & ‘clusters’ to ‘regional innovation systems’ (RIS) • RIS is more generic – emphasis on economic and social relations and networks spanning the public & private sectors within regions embedded in national and global production systems. • Regional Innovation Platforms Constructed Regional Advantage • Regions recognised as key drivers of innovation – key attributes include density of actors, connectedness, knowledge bases, flexibility and mobility in labour markets • HEIs as key players in regional innovation ecosystems – focus on human capital formation and enhancement, knowledge spillovers, translation and knowledge transfer mechanisms, catalysts for strategic partnerships, global networking –> potential for enduring transformations
RIS, types of HEI and mix Knowledge: domains, providers and diffusion • Analytical – know why – ‘blue skies’ R&D • Synthetic – know how – applied science & engineering, • Symbolic – know who – creative arts & humanities • In reality each type provided by most HEIs, but intensity and density of provision varies by HEI and region • Institutional diversity a strength, but greater impact via system coherence • Highest levels of innovation and added value when all 3 combined • RIS seeks to provide all three through collaboration and alignment to regional profile • Need to recognize that: • HEI is complementary to regional development, but it is not subservient to it. • the diverse roles of HEIs as sites of learning and the value of Engaged rather than Entrepreneurial approach
Types of Higher Education Institutions • Humboldt / Newman University --- focus on ‘formation of the person’ • Engaged University --- origins in late C19th US land-grant universities • Entrepreneurial University --- ‘triple helix model’ based on new relationships between academia, industry and government. • Engaged University • Knowledge as a public good supported by open science • Knowledge value determined by peer assessment within the university system on basis of cognitive rationality • Autonomy and fiduciary system are fundamental • Entrepreneurial University • Knowledge as a commodity to generate revenue for providers • Knowledge value often determined by external agents guided by economic rationality • Subservient to economic and political interests
Conclusions • HEIs are to come under increasing pressure over next two decades • Huge demographic pressures to expand • Political pressure to serve society and economy in more explicit ways; to provide more differentiated HEI landscape • Public/political pressure to be recognised as ‘world class’ institutions • Under-resourced and uncoordinated incremental expansion problematic, at same time needs to be self-organising and organic and to retain autonomy • One path forward is regional innovation systems that complement and strengthen regional economies whilst scaling to national and international HEI landscape • Links together autonomous institutions into strategic alliances to provide complementary and differentiated HE teaching, research and engagement • Such RIS in development, but at early stages • Requires alignment of other government policy such as National Spatial Strategy and National Development Plan and investment
www.airo.ie airomaps.nuim.ie/HEIcatchments Rob.Kitchin@nuim.ie